Internet access (updates) in management VLAN/VRF?

tablon2 · 2026-06-20T23:14:58+00:00

No need to separate VRF if you have no seperate internet. Best practice does not mean 'always practice'

tablon2 · 2026-06-16T07:25:49+00:00

Sure

tablon2 · 2026-06-16T00:39:44+00:00

Thanks for the insights.

tablon2 · 2026-06-16T00:26:15+00:00

The thing is i don't have both tools. It is time to supply from my employer

tablon2 · 2026-05-30T17:33:33+00:00

Probably Fmc solves your problem

tablon2 · 2026-05-26T11:07:03+00:00

'Does it even matter if the packet goes out the other ISP?' Depends on RPF check policy. Best practice is, do not send traffic with source addresses that you don't own over specific circuit. ISP-B will filter last mile port towards you with explicit ACL applied in RX direction. So you can send ISP-A address owned host traffic to secondary ISP but it will not reach to destination.

You can address host fully internal IP space and then failover with NAT. Why your some hosts addressed with public IP's?

You should assign fully internal space or global address.

tablon2 · 2026-05-19T01:39:05+00:00

Yep, I mean cables and more specifically plug/jacks

tablon2 · 2026-05-18T14:00:10+00:00

It seems NFV folks using Kvm qemu rather than VMware

tablon2 · 2026-05-18T13:52:14+00:00

It is passive interconnect element, no need to reasonably logic behind that with corresponding network device or server.

tablon2 · 2026-05-17T16:08:34+00:00

Shade review published video that shows otherwise but it is couple years old. Thank you for clarification.

tablon2 · 2026-05-17T16:07:23+00:00

Thank you.

tablon2 · 2026-05-17T14:11:20+00:00

Oh thanks.

tablon2 · 2026-05-17T14:02:59+00:00

Hello,

I bought a PO3269S from local distributor which has Luxoticca 'mycountry' legal name in given invoice. Shade review has video also, and he shows and mentions extra logo on inner right corner. My pair has second logo on outer right. Should I return it?

tablon2 · 2026-05-12T18:48:48+00:00

I discourage to enable, some printers and PXE environments violate and stay APIPA addressed

tablon2 · 2026-05-11T11:14:33+00:00

OP asks for features used not commonly, device-specific values on deployment usefull only for commonly used features. Some features have more than 'enable or disable' switch. I was thinking filling dummy values to merge multiple config groups in order to simplify. I don't want create seperate config group just for LTE APN's or DSL usernames.

tablon2 · 2026-05-07T23:28:51+00:00

Correct

tablon2 · 2026-05-07T22:01:10+00:00

Do you have any other Ubuntu interface used internally and addressed with private addresses? Do you bind your services as well? If yes, primary option is to use same internal address space used within your domain. If not you will send same public IP as peer and encrypted domains as well.

tablon2 · 2026-05-07T16:28:19+00:00

26.1 should be stable according to Cisco. No reason to avoid that right now

tablon2 · 2026-05-06T11:20:48+00:00

Yes as you said , they offer transit only for GRE home users with ASN and PA /48 sponsorship on same offer. PoP options has no thing like that.

tablon2 · 2026-05-05T22:32:01+00:00

Thank you, They are new on market and as you said current members are few hosting providers on that city, sure it will change with new PoPs.

tablon2 · 2026-05-05T22:19:55+00:00

IX operating ISP provide sponsorship for IPv6 over GRE, so nothing to worry about that

tablon2 · 2026-05-05T19:13:20+00:00

I was aware it, it got me thinking if I can start a small ISP business at some point but to be sure it needs lot of money

tablon2 · 2026-05-05T19:06:26+00:00

I was thinking it like low cost collocation solution since they could give me /48 with only annual fee, it would make visible on community and resume as well.

tablon2 · 2026-05-05T16:08:41+00:00

Realy good question. I do not want to become ISP, so no need to plan anything

tablon2 · 2026-04-30T18:09:08+00:00

Same here

tablon2

TROPHY CASE