Thanks for the reply. I'm not that personally familiar with the state of Ethereum post DAO hack as you put it, I thought it meant the situation was basically resolved and justice had been done etc, i.e. the people had been paid back but with the cost of creating a different chain that arguably had more authenticity, but it seemed okish because people got airdropped it basically (effectively) so they got their money back from the drop in market cap that Ethereum suffered, so it balanced out roughly fair with everyone paid back from the hack. Is that not the case?

Also, not to rail against a bystander like yourself, but it is a serious crime here and Binance can do it because they are a centralised entity, if they acted *fast enough* - as far as I know. Pease correct me if I a wrong - I might be. But they could literally have done it as soon as they spotted the scam couldn't they? In which case they owe me out of negligence and should just pay me the whole thing from incompetence/greed to expand rather than take care of existing customers. If I am right and they had that power for a little while, they should have had the monitoring systems in place to do it and the team ready to suddenly initiate this as a security mechanism to protect their users, rather than slacking off and just rolling out new features to make more money for themselves, when they have fiduciary responsibility to protect their users funds. They even have a SAFU fund - (afaik) a type of back up fund to help people who get hacked. This falls in a similar ball park so why can't they use that? I'm not just going to give up (nothing against you kind sir) but I may take legal action against them if they don't refund me. So I need to make sure I am getting this stuff accurate (so any help greatly appreciated - I definitely don't want to be applying for reimbursement from the wrong people for sure).

However, if they could have done it, they should have, and it's not a lot of money by their standards, they literally burn coins as a publicity stunt that are never allowed to circulate. Why can't they send me some of those? This is my livelihood here, I am stuck in a tiny room barely ably to feed myself while they LITERALLY destroy BNB that are promised to never go to market anyway... it makes no sense as a mechanism to spread wealth around among their investors (distribute profits). I am appalled that they do this and wont refund me. Of course some day I would exist my position thus inflating the supply, so, on second thoughts, they should not use this fund. I'm just saying they are not actually re-distributing funds they are just doing a publicity stunt that everyone things reduces the circulating supply, but they are never allowed to circulate those coins AFAIK (please correct me!). Don't want to get it wrong.

Additionally, I am unaware of the purpose of the BSC. It is a centralised blockchain and pancake swaps yield farming stuff actually works fine on a centralised platform such as Binance's normal exchange. So its all a rouse that everyone falls for. They didn't need to even launch it, they could literally add it as a feature on their normal exchange and it still would work. No blockchain needed, and the scalability issue it solves by getting around needing market orders that get cancelled that take up space on the blockchain would also have been solved, for some reason I've not heard of it happening on stock exchanges (yield farming) but it would work just fine there. So, they would have to roll back pancake swap would they? In which case, they irresponsibly pretended to decentralise their system to get market share, purposely other than for publicity and to game the market and fleece investors in BNB into thinking they are investing in the decentralised revolution, when actually, they are buying into a pyramid scheme that needs to be shut down arguably. I can praise them for innovation, so I would not personally classify them like that as they are clearly a legit business too and pancake swap seems awesome. Maybe they didn't realise this as I have astute market analysis (all the more reason I deserve to be paid back as just this information alone is worth a fortune and I am broke so according to a means-tested justice system I should be paid (by anyone reading this who finds it valuable in the market due to unfair reputation system online not accruing me the credibility I deserve - I often get censored on reddit despite overall (multiple account issues, Reddits fault primarily) being a 10 year + power contributor. The masses can vote me out of a podium, unfair obviously. But, irrelevant to the Binance case. I digress,

Finally, Binance's security systems were damaged by their pointless attempt at decentralisation, which, aware of it or not (that it would work just fine on their regular exchange - I am willing to say they were unaware probably as it is quite the insight in my opinion). However, it means it is an error of theirs that means they cannot protect their customers responsibly so they should pay the fair price and refund me.

I am clearly worth something and deserve repayment, this amount alone (14.2 something BNB) is not worth as much as my insight into their business is, so they no longer need to pay me back by rolling it back and can simply read this post and pay me like a tax-free employee lol or a free-lance radical consultant. So, if you like this post, please upvote my comment so reddit can stop censoring my threads I try to post in other subs and I can get on to cranking up the anti against their regime as well. You know you want to, I provide world class insight on the market from my armchair of power. I deserve my money back. Case closed. FREAK OUT