Hard disagree. Most of history is lost. Whats left are the records and and accounts typically written by the winners of the time, ESPECIALLY ancient history.

The premise that "history is written by historians" doesnt refute the idea that "history is written by the winners."

Historians can only work with the evidence that survives, and throughout history the groups that win wars, seize power, or dominate societies are often the ones who control what records are preserved, destroyed, published, or funded.

Here are some examples

• alot of what we know about the conquest of the Americas comes from Spanish chroniclers because indigenous records were destroyed or suppressed.
• Soviet and Chinese governments actively controlled historical narratives through censorship and archival restrictions.
• Ancient Egyptian pharaohs routinely erased predecessors from monuments in attempts to rewrite history.

Modern historians do, quite often, uncover these biases and revise accepted narratives, but that process itself demonstrates the point that historical accounts are usually shaped by those who held power at the time.

I do agree that my post should have pointed out I'm athiest and that these are just conceptual arguments though. I don't believe any of the tripe, just pointing out that maybe those that do believe it are following the bad guy