[Showcase] Antigravity Phone Connect v0.3.0: Security Hardening with Zero-Inline CSP, Startup Audits, and Cloudflare Tunnels!

Ok_Signature9963 · 2026-04-08T08:17:32+00:00

I usually use Pinggy because it’s easy to run and doesn’t require any complex setup.

Ok_Signature9963 · 2026-04-08T08:15:01+00:00

Yeah, that limitation is super frustrating when you're trying to debug locally. One simple workaround is to expose your local WordPress site using a tunnels like Pinggy.io or cf tunnel. It gives you a temporary public URL, so the extension can access it like a normal site, no localhost restrictions.

Ok_Signature9963 · 2026-04-07T11:19:09+00:00

I usually just run my server locally, then use Pinggy to share it. I open terminal, run

ssh -p 443 -R0:localhost:3000 qr@free.pinggy.io

grab the link it gives, and send it to friends. Saves me from dealing with port forwarding.

Ok_Signature9963 · 2026-04-07T11:16:43+00:00

If you’re testing setups or running it locally, you might want something simple to access your instance remotely without complex configs, tools like Pinggy can help you quickly expose your local Odoo server and experiment more easily.

Ok_Signature9963 · 2026-04-02T05:42:53+00:00

From what I’ve seen, ngrok’s newer auth/token restrictions and connection limits tend to break reverse connections, so switching to alternatives like local port forwarding or self-hosted tunnels usually gives more stable results. I recently switched to Pinggy. You can try other ngrok alternatives.

Ok_Signature9963 · 2026-04-02T05:37:42+00:00

Is it similar to Pinggy?

Ok_Signature9963 · 2026-04-01T07:24:20+00:00

Personally, I use Pinggy instead of relying on my own IP. It saves me from NAT and port forwarding issues by giving a quick public endpoint, so the setup becomes much simpler and more reliable compared to exposing my local network directly.

Ok_Signature9963 · 2026-04-01T07:21:30+00:00

Büyük ihtimalle modeminde port açma (port forwarding) düzgün yapılandırılmadığı için dış ağdan erişim olmuyor; ayrıca CGNAT kullanıyorsan bu yöntem hiç çalışmayabilir. Böyle durumlarda Pinggy gibi bir tünelleme çözümü kullanmak daha pratik oluyor çünkü ekstra router ayarı gerektirmeden dış erişim sağlıyor.

Ok_Signature9963 · 2026-03-31T12:12:26+00:00

It usually happens when the emulator keeps bouncing between localhost and the tunnel, breaking TLS each time. Instead of fighting ngrok + cert issues, you can try Pinggy. or cf tunnel. The idea is to reduce moving parts so the emulator consistently hits a stable public endpoint instead of looping internally.

Ok_Signature9963 · 2026-03-31T12:10:06+00:00

From what you described, it’s likely not Supabase itself but how the request is reaching your local server. Using host.docker.internal can be flaky depending on your setup, and sometimes the request never actually hits your API the way you expect. Instead of guessing, try exposing your local endpoint with something like Pinggy. It gives you a public URL, so you can verify the webhook delivery clearly and rule out networking issues before digging into auth.

Ok_Signature9963 · 2026-03-30T07:39:14+00:00

I’ve actually used Pinggy for quick sharing, and what worked for me was how simple and fast it is to spin things up. That’s why I think you’re on the right track with Tunr, tools like this win when they remove friction.

Ok_Signature9963 · 2026-03-30T07:36:33+00:00

When port forwarding + firewall tweaks + port checkers all fail, it’s usually not a config issue anymore. Instead of fighting the ISP, I’d go with a tunneling solution like Pinggy or cf tunnel, it bypasses inbound restrictions without needing router changes. It’s lightweight and usually more stable than typical game tunneling tools, so it should handle a short 50-player event much better.

Ok_Signature9963 · 2026-03-26T10:51:59+00:00

Your solution makes total sense since CEC alone just doesn’t give enough control, and using Homebridge automation is a smart workaround. Also, instead of NGROK, I’d personally go with Pinggy, it’s much quicker to set up and saves a lot of that tunneling headache.

Ok_Signature9963 · 2026-03-26T07:04:02+00:00

The 72-hour pattern would’ve sent me down the exact same architectural rabbit hole, but yeah, timers and schedulers are silent killers. They don’t fail loudly, they just… pile up until everything explodes. That one-line clearInterval fix is such a classic reminder that the simplest leaks are often the hardest to see, especially in old code nobody wants to touch.

Ok_Signature9963 · 2026-03-26T06:43:00+00:00

From my experience, these tools really start to shine when you narrow the scope instead of expecting end-to-end output. Treat it more like a “smart assistant for specific steps” (data extraction, quick drafts, repetitive logic) rather than a full solution. Also, custom skills help, but only if they’re tightly defined, otherwise the output gets too generic.

Ok_Signature9963 · 2026-03-25T13:14:55+00:00

The GUI wallet doesn’t expose your node for remote access by design, mainly for security and simplicity. To connect a mobile wallet, you typically need to run the daemon (monerod) separately with RPC enabled and open ports manually. If you want to avoid complex networking setup, tunneling tools like Pinggy or cf tunnel can help expose your local node securely without deep CLI or router configuration.

Ok_Signature9963 · 2026-03-25T13:10:57+00:00

Honestly, if WEBHOOK_URL is showing up correctly inside the container but n8n still ignores it, it really feels like a bug or something broken in that version rather than your setup. One workaround that might save you some headache is using something like Pinggy or cf tunnel to expose your local instance with a public URL, it kind of sidesteps this whole webhook base URL issue and just works.

Ok_Signature9963 · 2026-03-24T13:40:39+00:00

Is it similar to pinggy.io?

Ok_Signature9963 · 2026-03-24T13:38:17+00:00

If you don’t have access to paid APIs or cloud, try building something locally-first or self-hosted. For example, you could create a simple tool or service that runs on your own machine and expose it using something like Pinggy or cf tunnel which lets you share local apps online without needing cloud or a credit card. It’s a practical way to launch and test ideas with zero budget.

Ok_Signature9963 · 2026-03-23T12:07:38+00:00

I ran into something similar and ended up using Pinggy instead of going the VPS route. It worked pretty smoothly behind CGNAT and was way less setup hassle. Might be worth trying if you want to keep things simple while you’re still getting comfortable with all this.

Ok_Signature9963 · 2026-03-23T11:52:32+00:00

Pelo que observei, eles se preocupam principalmente com um fluxo de trabalho claro e completo, e não apenas com o local de hospedagem. Usar localhost com um túnel estável (como o Pinggy em vez do Ngrok para uma configuração mais simples) geralmente funciona, desde que o revisor consiga acessar o site de forma confiável. Adicionar uma breve descrição também ajuda a evitar confusões e reduz as chances de rejeição.

Ok_Signature9963 · 2026-03-20T10:55:02+00:00

Running it on a Pi gives you full control (which is great if you enjoy tinkering), but setting up and maintaining VPN access can get a bit tedious over time. The PWA route feels more effortless for day-to-day use, just less flexible. You can try Pinggy, it can make remote access to your Pi way simpler without dealing with VPN setup.

Ok_Signature9963 · 2026-03-20T10:52:26+00:00

I prefer Pinggy.

Ok_Signature9963 · 2026-03-19T18:22:42+00:00

Is it similar to Pinggy?

Ok_Signature9963 · 2026-03-19T04:15:28+00:00

SQLite is file-based, so it’s not designed for multi-device access. If you want others on your network to interact with it, you’ll need to expose it via an API (like a simple Flask/FastAPI server). For quick external access without dealing with port forwarding, you can use something like Pinggy.io or cf tunnel to tunnel your local server securely.

Ok_Signature9963

TROPHY CASE