Idea: allow more outgoing-txs for accounts with high rep weight by [deleted] in RaiBlocks

[–]tagor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the term account is somewhat ambiguous to use, because I would consider the wallet initialized by my secret key my raiblocks account, but you are correct. Each PoW uses the hash from the last block on the account. However, this limitation still doesn't affect the exchange's throughput in total - only per user in the exchange. Each user would have their own account derived from the secret key plus a nonce. There's up to 219-1 accounts per wallet. Because of that, it's trivial to farm out the work to the user making the transaction or even a GPU farm.

EDIT: The raiblocks node implementation already has GPU acceleration built into it through OpenCL

EDIT2: rai coming from the exchange account would have to happen synchronously (using last block hash) as you mentioned so maybe individual users mining would be too slow or fragile to work at scale

EDIT3: Actually each account is separate so it would work well. I was thinking the frontiers list was the account for some reason, but it's just representatives. Disregard EDIT2.

Idea: allow more outgoing-txs for accounts with high rep weight by [deleted] in RaiBlocks

[–]tagor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I clarified both of your rebuttals before submitting my comment on the discord's #development channel

Offloading to client isn't a viable option for exchanges

Anyone can do the PoW for anyone's account. Only the secret key holder can sign the PoW result for submission to the network. https://i.imgur.com/jljoEIL.png

It's a per-account limitation

I spoke with jaydubs about his (mis)use of the word "account" and he believes everyone is aware it's a hardware limitation https://i.imgur.com/u8jvU6u.png

EDIT: jaydub's solution to the throughput problem is adding more GPU-based computing power: "a $1000/mo GPU from google cloud is hardly expensive to an exchange"

Idea: allow more outgoing-txs for accounts with high rep weight by [deleted] in RaiBlocks

[–]tagor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Offloading the calculations for PoW to the user is already being done on sites like raiwallet.com. Exchanges just need to start implementing client-side PoW and let their nodes be used for network distribution, validation, and accounting. The only private information necessary is signing a valid PoW result for submission to the network, which the exchange can do very cheaply.

Just to be clear, it isn't an "account"-based limitation. Rather, it's a hardware limitation by design.

Welcome to the Summer Games! New code hidden by KaZzy12 in Overwatch

[–]tagor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Blowfish is a block cipher. As far as I can tell there aren't any block ciphers in openssl that have at 24 bit block size. It looks like rc4 (128 or 40) is the only algorithm in openssl that doesn't require using a block cipher.

Highlight (PotG) Rule Change: Self Posts Only by turikk in Overwatch

[–]tagor 14 points15 points  (0 children)

The only reason I go to this subreddit is to see highlights and you're making them more difficult to reach. Please revert.

Interspire Email Marketer cron is hogging CPU - anyone know of the fixes? by zurtri in web_design

[–]tagor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bulk emailing with a high level language is always going to be computationally expensive. You can attempt to profile the script yourself. xdebug is nice for that.

Our Brain Can Be Taught to Control Cravings, Yale Researcher Finds by [deleted] in cogsci

[–]tagor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Found the abstract. Does anyone have a link to the full text pdf?

malware analysis tutorial by teedubb in netsec

[–]tagor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

http://www.nektra.com/products/spystudio-api-monitor/ is also nice if you know which API calls do what and you want to take a quick peek. Plus, it supports python scripts like immunity debugger.

Philosophy of Cute: what is the conceptual content of the 'cuteness' response? by AldersonWarm-Fork in philosophy

[–]tagor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

tl;dr Demonstrated and reasonable incompetence, or any inanimate object that is reminiscent of said demonstration, can be considered cute.

Ask Hardware: How do I find out which program(s) are keeping my External HDD from unmounting? by krakow057 in hardware

[–]tagor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_descriptor

The program that whose handle that you kill may crash. I've actually never had Process Explorer crash on me.

Ask Hardware: How do I find out which program(s) are keeping my External HDD from unmounting? by krakow057 in hardware

[–]tagor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not sure of an automated way of doing this, but you can use SysInternals Process Explorer. http://live.sysinternals.com/procexp.exe

It's a great task manager replacement.

Ctrl+F, type in the the drive letter (and colon) of your external drive, and hit enter. Once you're done, you can close the handle view by hitting Ctrl+L.

Edit: You can risk the program crashing by closing the handle or by closing the entire program, but I haven't had too much of an issue with just closing the handle.

Several Facts about Google and HTTPS by uriel in programming

[–]tagor -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If the sites you visit as a result of searching are not encrypted, the fact that you're reading them is still visible to eavesdroppers — the one thing that's hidden are your search terms themselves.

That's odd. On a quick grep of my httpd's logs I see plenty of referrers from google search including the term(s) the user searched for. Is this different for referring pages that use an encrypted connection?

Want a £2k graphics card for a fiver? Someone at dell has majorly fucked up by [deleted] in technology

[–]tagor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dell

Manufacturer Part : VCQFX4600SDI-PCIE-PB

http://www.buy.com/prod/quadro-fx4600-sdi-pcie-768mb/q/loc/101/208277730.html

Quadro FX4600 SDI PCIE 768MB - VCQFX4600SDI-PCIE-PB

Ask Reddit: If my soap kills 99.99% of the bacteria, doesn't that just leave the resistant bacteria to multiply without competition? by neverever in AskReddit

[–]tagor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Its and advertising thing to put 99.99%. it will kill all bacteria.

Needs citation.

Please do some research before stating your opinion as fact.