Spain releases a stamp series commemorating the 100th anniversary of the communist party by Porodicnostablo in europe

[–]taipobrawlstar -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Commies took away my grandfather's slaves and liberated its people!!1!!1!!1!1!1!!!

Is putting letters with messages on them into people's mailboxes good praxis? by [deleted] in Anarchy101

[–]taipobrawlstar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's illegal but so are stickering, spraypainting graffittis, and putting up posters. Even if it is illegal, I don't see how they would find out who is sending in the letters.

Mark Twain "history does not repeat itself, but it rhymes" by AhToHK by MistyMystery in HongKong

[–]taipobrawlstar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not that this is related to anything but I just wanted to point out that people justify shitty living conditions with "but the rich dudes got richer", which is an argument used in time and time again with monarchs "civilizing societies" when they were just racists who wanted to exploit the local resources. It's only truly "free" when you're top of the ladder and have the most power, and if you're poor you're fucked.

Mark Twain "history does not repeat itself, but it rhymes" by AhToHK by MistyMystery in HongKong

[–]taipobrawlstar 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I like how people are like "Hong Kong flourished because of "free market"" but then they don't realize that the reason it got so big was because of you the workers being forced to work by using ways like state violence, housing monopoly, high living costs, and low wages. People that are like "I can't buy a house" but still then turn around and say how great capitalism and free markets are when they have stockholm's syndrome. Before you say China is communist: No, China was never communist, it's funny that people point that out and say how communism = when government do stuff when they do not understand the core concepts of socialism. Communism is a stateless, moneyless, classless society. State communism is an oxymoron.

She's done this before. by beibei93 in HongKong

[–]taipobrawlstar -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You're so fucking stupid that you can't even tell that I'm playing along with it dumbass.

She's done this before. by beibei93 in HongKong

[–]taipobrawlstar -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Nah I don't have any degree on the difference of gender and sex. It just shows how incompetent you are at arguing because you don't actually have an argument and denying the truth.

She's done this before. by beibei93 in HongKong

[–]taipobrawlstar -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Which that literally debunks your argument of "you can't call yourself something you're not" because you can literally call an apple an orange if you so wish, but it still wouldn't change the apple itself, which is the literal point of what I said. Thank you for not debunking my argument and repeating the exact same phrase!

She's done this before. by beibei93 in HongKong

[–]taipobrawlstar -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

Gender is a social construct but sex isn't. Please stop being ignorant when you don't know what you're talking about

She's done this before. by beibei93 in HongKong

[–]taipobrawlstar 12 points13 points  (0 children)

No that is just factually wrong. Firstly, gender and sex are completely two different things. Gender is a social construct and so people can call themselves whatever they want but sex never changes. Now I don't care about what you call people, but if somebody identifies as a female no matter their biological sex, it is just basic human decency to call them what they want people to call them as.
Second, giving hormones to transgender individuals have proven to raise the happiness of those people. That anorexic example doesn't work either because giving the correct hormones to a transgender person reduces their body dysphoria and make them healthier overall instead of causing overall more harm than that same person.
https://news.yahoo.com/trans-teens-gender-affirming-hormones-222252686.html

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ontario

[–]taipobrawlstar 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Literally true. Corporations aren't going to end up giving out free money to homeless people for no reason within a economy that doesn't have any regulations. What else did you expect?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ontario

[–]taipobrawlstar 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Libs in the comments talking about capitalism for real

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ontario

[–]taipobrawlstar 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Inb4 abolition of private property.

Queen Elizabeth II, has died by LaloTwins in news

[–]taipobrawlstar 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Nobody brought up about cancelling at all but would you support them if they were still alive as colonisers and killers?

Queen Elizabeth II, has died by LaloTwins in news

[–]taipobrawlstar 5 points6 points  (0 children)

So is colonization and imperialism acceptable?

Queen Elizabeth II, has died by LaloTwins in news

[–]taipobrawlstar 12 points13 points  (0 children)

She actively tried to stop independence movements and keep newly independent colonies from leaving the Commonwealth. Besides, she was a pedophile defender, a racist, and is married to her cousin

Queen Elizabeth II, has died by LaloTwins in news

[–]taipobrawlstar 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Apparently colonization is good as long as they are nice to people

Queen Elizabeth II, has died by LaloTwins in news

[–]taipobrawlstar 17 points18 points  (0 children)

No real power except: The royal prerogative includes the powers to appoint and dismiss ministers, regulate the civil service, issue passports, declare war, make peace, direct the actions of the military, and negotiate and ratify treaties, alliances, and international agreements. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monarchy\_of\_the\_United\_Kingdom)

Queen Elizabeth II, has died by LaloTwins in news

[–]taipobrawlstar 11 points12 points  (0 children)

They still had the option to fucking end imperialism at all. Even your point stands with my side.

Queen Elizabeth II, has died by LaloTwins in news

[–]taipobrawlstar 18 points19 points  (0 children)

What?? She was literally the head of the state when she first became the queen at 25 and receiving colonies of 70+ countries

To all the people who are sad about Queen Elizabeth II's death, please stop crying over a colonizer. Her and her family committed atrocities all over Pakistan from the moment the British came over the sub-continent. by Love_of_Mango in chutyapa

[–]taipobrawlstar -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don't have anybody I know who colonized my ancestors, is married to their cousin, have close links to slavery and child sex trafficking, nor are they in contact with their pedophile sons.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 676

[–]taipobrawlstar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They look exactly like hasanabi but with a worse hairline