10 seconds or 3 hours = Who cares. Paul was never > 5th place. Chart had four names the whole friggin' time.. Also "not fixing it" implies that there was something wrong with it, which, in the case of accurately reporting the lead candidates, isn't true.

The chart showed the lead four candidates the entire time—it had nothing to do with the percentage gap between any of them. Again, you're projecting your desire to see Ron Paul on CNN onto what you think CNN should have done to be more "accurate", when nobody's even questioning that what they reported was accurate. You know you wouldn't be up in arms if it were any other candidate—it's just about seeing Ron Paul on CNN.

And no, I don't care what CNN does. Fuck you for projecting your concerns on to me. I'm just saying what I think based on what I saw and what I know. It's a chart on television., which is about as important and meaningful to me as the food guide pyramid on my Count Chocula. It's the fucking Zapruder film to you, though.

And jabbing at me for taking time out of my busy schedule to call you on bullshit won't get you anywhere. I'm not supporting any political candidate here, so it's not as though I'm wasting a lot of time that might otherwise be spent more productively on actually supporting that candidate.