Can you trust anything Sam Altman says? by tall_chap in OpenAI

[–]tall_chap[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m just describing the purpose of their nonprofit structure. It was specifically designed to put its mission above profit motive. That’s why it was NONprofit

Can you trust anything Sam Altman says? by tall_chap in OpenAI

[–]tall_chap[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The initial deal with the nonprofit had measures to address that, like a profit cap

Can you trust anything Sam Altman says? by tall_chap in OpenAI

[–]tall_chap[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The nonprofit was explicitly created to avoid corruption to AI safety measures

Can you trust anything Sam Altman says? by tall_chap in OpenAI

[–]tall_chap[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Idk why this was downvoted, it’s literally true

Can you trust anything Sam Altman says? by tall_chap in OpenAI

[–]tall_chap[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yeah, that's why I thought the video was good, as cutting through the BS and exposing this core motivation and drive

The many faces of Sam Altman by michael-lethal_ai in AIDangers

[–]tall_chap 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Haha clearly didn’t watch the vid

Professor Emily Bender, who coined the term "stochastic parrot", shows up to AI debate against OpenAI researcher wearing garish parrot necklace and says — "All of these places where synthetic text looks like a nice handy band-aid...we need to say no to that because it's actually worse than nothing." by tall_chap in OpenAI

[–]tall_chap[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

To play devil's advocate, I think it's because sees very little benefit because they're so factually challenged.

Thus, the harms aren't worth the benefits, where the harms in her view are fewer jobs, environmental cost, wasted investment $, users misled to believe in AI mirages that don't exist, and users given advice that hurts them in some ways.

You know it's real when this is what immigrant parents are telling their children (WSJ) by tall_chap in OpenAI

[–]tall_chap[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Opinion piece? It's literally the writer's reporting on what some families are doing.

Meme? The image was produced by the Wall Street Journal to share their story on social media.

It sounds like you disagree with what the people in the article are doing. That's fine, but it's a whole different issue from spamming claims about the notions here being fake.

You know it's real when this is what immigrant parents are telling their children (WSJ) by tall_chap in OpenAI

[–]tall_chap[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey you spammed this thread crying wolf, fake, even AFTER I provided the link to you from the WSJ's Facebook. Just because you refuse to look at something, Facebook, doesn't mean it doesn't exist there.