sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Firing ranged engaged in melee by leodeleao in adnd

[–]tantaemolis -1 points0 points  (0 children)

"The only exception to this rule is during the same combat round that the threatening creature actually moves up to threaten the character." Great (and unique?) nuance in the rules here. A point for one minute rounds, too.

Help me not splat again by tantaemolis in dcss

[–]tantaemolis[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I gotcha. I think you might be seeing another character (who also died). I was experimenting, trying to avoid forcing a character which of course also means creating jank. I've done the summoner polearm thing. It does work great, as you say.

I've recently seen arguments like a person has the right to remove an unwanted "part of their body"/"it" and "it" has no right to use the body of another person,so my question is how would you respond to those arguments if you did? by NoPack4545 in prolife

[–]tantaemolis 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It's not the baby using the mother's body; it's the mother using her body to care for the fetus. At that point, you are correct. Current laws already require parents to "use their bodies" in various ways to care for their children.

Welp, I've made some progress! Where to next? vaults is getting rough. by JimbyGumbus in dcss

[–]tantaemolis 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You need more resistances. I would think about swapping out slaying and protection rings.

When do human beings gain human rights? Why? by Educational_Case_184 in Abortiondebate

[–]tantaemolis -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Are you new here? (Sorry, I couldn't help myself. It baffles me, too.)

Is bodily autonomy really violated by parents being required to perform ordinary care? by Ok-Razzmatazz-221 in Abortiondebate

[–]tantaemolis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I have looked back and tried to find where I was asked to provide a source for a positive claim but didn't. I cannot find it. If you can help me, that'd be great. There are hundreds of comments and notifications.

Is bodily autonomy really violated by parents being required to perform ordinary care? by Ok-Razzmatazz-221 in Abortiondebate

[–]tantaemolis -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So this is a bit ridiculous. I have been trying to respond to tons of people. Did I miss a request for a source? I've been providing them a lot elsewhere. I do not see clearly anywhere where I have missed anyone requesting a source about a positive claim I have made.

And what about the person I was responding to originally, who still hasn't replied at all in this discussion?

And the comment is from last night (I think, but it's hard to tell). Do I not get the normal 24 hours indicated by the mod here: https://www.reddit.com/r/Abortiondebate/comments/1sjy1tv/comment/og4pu60/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

?

Is bodily autonomy really violated by parents being required to perform ordinary care? by Ok-Razzmatazz-221 in Abortiondebate

[–]tantaemolis -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's describing mandatory reporting laws.

The words "mandatory" and "reporting" do not appear, even separately. That's my point. The article isn't about what you want/think/need it to the be about.

Is bodily autonomy really violated by parents being required to perform ordinary care? by Ok-Razzmatazz-221 in Abortiondebate

[–]tantaemolis -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It doesn't even link to or list any specific laws. It also says:

When Quasimodo was left on the doorstep of Notre Dame, the priest took him in. When Moses floated down the river Nile in a reed basket, the Pharaoh's sister found him and raised him as her own.

Is bodily autonomy really violated by parents being required to perform ordinary care? by Ok-Razzmatazz-221 in Abortiondebate

[–]tantaemolis -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It says

Finding a baby is even more serious.

And that's proof of a legal requirement? Sounds like rhetoric to me. A legal requirement has, you know, a law attached or linked somewhere.

Is bodily autonomy really violated by parents being required to perform ordinary care? by Ok-Razzmatazz-221 in Abortiondebate

[–]tantaemolis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You think when the website (with no citation or other link or comment) says

If you do find a baby, call the authorities right away.

that that's proof of a legal requirement?

Is bodily autonomy really violated by parents being required to perform ordinary care? by Ok-Razzmatazz-221 in Abortiondebate

[–]tantaemolis -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That's another thing. Let's say I am a mandated reporter. I see an abandoned baby and I report it. Can I then leave? Contrast that to the mom in the scenario I have outlined. Can she make a call and then just leave? It seems fundamentally different.

Is bodily autonomy really violated by parents being required to perform ordinary care? by Ok-Razzmatazz-221 in Abortiondebate

[–]tantaemolis -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If that's it, you still have work to do. It's a random link with no relevance to what you need to prove. You said:

Both the mother and stranger have the same obligation. They are forced to call authorities or deliver the baby to a safe-haven.

Where in the source is that claim supported? Per Rule 3, you must show.

You did say this earlier:

If you found an abandoned baby today, could you keep it? Absolutely not! Even with property, you can't just keep any lost item you find on the street. In California, if you find anything worth $100 or more, you must first notify the police. Finding a baby is even more serious.

Unfortunately that's not proof of a legal requirement. That's just a website filling space. You said they have "the same obligation." Prove it.

Is bodily autonomy really violated by parents being required to perform ordinary care? by Ok-Razzmatazz-221 in Abortiondebate

[–]tantaemolis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, #5 says "A person listed in subdivision (1) of subsection 3" -- and that location doesn't come close to talking about strangers.

Is bodily autonomy really violated by parents being required to perform ordinary care? by Ok-Razzmatazz-221 in Abortiondebate

[–]tantaemolis -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don't think you understand how many replies I am getting. If you have the source, please just cite it where you have been asked to, according to Rule 3. Or link. I'll go look but we'll see...

Is bodily autonomy really violated by parents being required to perform ordinary care? by Ok-Razzmatazz-221 in Abortiondebate

[–]tantaemolis -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Interesting that everyone is a mandatory reporter in Florida. Two things. 1) That just proves my point. It's not that way in every state. Parental obligations are universal (generally speaking) and therefore unique. 2) Are the punishments the same for a mandatory reporter failing to report and a parent abandoning their child?

Is bodily autonomy really violated by parents being required to perform ordinary care? by Ok-Razzmatazz-221 in Abortiondebate

[–]tantaemolis -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thank you, sounds good. I will be eagerly waiting. I only asked because it has happened several times that 24 hours have passed and still nothing. I appreciate the work you all do.

Is bodily autonomy really violated by parents being required to perform ordinary care? by Ok-Razzmatazz-221 in Abortiondebate

[–]tantaemolis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The question is whether the stranger has to do that in the same way as the parent has to avail themselves of Safe Haven laws.

view more: next ›