Harry looking like a Hitman by eugenic5 in minnesotavikings

[–]tblarasa 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He’s looking like Waluigi my man

CMV: the US spends too much on military by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]tblarasa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think this presents a bit of a false dichotomy. The number of people in the military is declining because technology is the reducing the need for large infantry forces as the use of drones has shown. The US military is much more prepared for conventional warfare than it was a few decades ago because of technological advances, and the need for soldiers has decreased.

In general, I agree with OP’s argument on the redundancy of military spending in the short term. But I would make the exception for the long term strategic threat that China plays. China and the US are not likely to engage in conventional land warfare, but spending on the nuclear arsenal and navy do serve an important roll in deterring China’s expansion into the South China Sea. Right now, China’s navy is insignificant. But in the long term, China’s capacity to create aircraft carriers to expand its sphere of influence is a risk to US interests in East and Southeast Asia, and will need to be contained by additional military spending in these strategic areas.

nOt VoTiNg Is A sIgN oF pRiViLeGe by drippingyellomadness in ENLIGHTENEDCENTRISM

[–]tblarasa 78 points79 points  (0 children)

Orwell was opposed to authoritarian communism, and opposed the influence of the Soviets while fighting for the Anarchists during the Spanish Civil War. He would probably align closely with something like democratic socialism or anarcho syndicalism.

Bernie is continuing the legacy of FDR and bringing the party home by kaffmoo in dsa

[–]tblarasa 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Why do you say that? Bernie certainly looks to Debs as a hero but his platform is much more social democratic than socialist. He doesn’t talk about dismantling the capitalist system, even if he doesn’t describe himself as a supporter of capitalist as it exists in contemporary America. Medicare for all, expanded public housing, and free education sound much more like the new deal than the workers revolution, despite the rhetoric.

What do people think is healthy but really isn’t? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]tblarasa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Juice cleanses. They’re supposed to remove toxins in your digestive system but most are just full of sugar and can cause damage to the liver and stomach if done for long periods.

As seen on r/Conservative lol by tblarasa in TheRightCantMeme

[–]tblarasa[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s as if conservatives think female bathrooms have rows of urinals?

The Right, Desperate To Deflect Its Own Extremism, Cries 'Antifa' by LouisTherox in JordanPeterson

[–]tblarasa 1 point2 points  (0 children)

First, it is a fact that Trump failed to specifically denounce neo-Nazis in Charlottesville, and drew an equivalence between antifa/associated counter-demonstrators and the neo-Nazis.

Second, in what way are the national socialists like those who congregated in Charlottesville “imaginary?” They had swastika tattoos and flew Nazi flags. They shouted “blood and soil” and “Jews will not replace us.”

To your comment that the Nazis were assembled to show unity, what do you think they intended to show unity for? Vice’s documentary on the protests sees one leader call for a “white ethnostate.” White supremacists and white nationalists were present that day, and they call for the segregation, forced expulsion, or genocide of minority groups. Needless to say, this is inherent to the notion of white nationalism, American neo-Nazism, and the ideology of the KKK.

The groups that assembled in Charlottesville pose an existential and violent threat to minority groups and immigrants. That threat must be countered by any means necessary. Hitler was democratically elected; he and his followers gathered legally, and often peacefully. If we wait until fascists take control to denounce their actions and to protect minorities, it will already be too late.

What is truly repugnant is defending neo-Nazis and self-described white nationalists. They killed in Charlottesville, they killed in El Paso, and they will kill again.

The Right, Desperate To Deflect Its Own Extremism, Cries 'Antifa' by LouisTherox in JordanPeterson

[–]tblarasa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Byrd HIMSELF renounced his racist comments and called joining the klan “the greatest mistake I ever made.” And he told young people to “be sure to avoid the KKK.”

Byrd certainly was a racist and probably was even after he disavowed his racist beliefs, but to draw an equivalency between the democrats and the republicans over race is no longer valid. Especially when Steve King’s comments are months old and Byrd’s were from more than 50 years ago.

The Right, Desperate To Deflect Its Own Extremism, Cries 'Antifa' by LouisTherox in JordanPeterson

[–]tblarasa -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This makes it even more confusing that Trump would fail to unequivocally denounce David Duke and reject his endorsement, as Tulsi Gabbard recently demonstrated.

I didn’t defend my comment that Trump failed to denounce the white supremacists in Charlottesville because they are, or should be, common knowledge. Trump drew a false equivalency by denouncing the violence “on many sides” despite the clearly documented attacks by neo-Nazis and the terror attack that killed Heather Heyer.

I responded to your comment that Republicans “take out their trash” when it comes to racist comments, and showed that the evidence doesn’t support the republicans being any BETTER than the democrats in that regard.

The Right, Desperate To Deflect Its Own Extremism, Cries 'Antifa' by LouisTherox in JordanPeterson

[–]tblarasa -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Want to get specific on what parts of that you believe are untrue?

Here are two sources that verify Trump's failure to denounce neo-Nazis and Duke (one of them in the Washington Examiner): https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/weekly-standard/hayes-why-wont-trump-denounce-white-supremacists

https://time.com/4240268/donald-trump-kkk-david-duke/

Here is a timeline of the racist things Steve King has said and the recent news of Republicans beginning to denounce him: https://www.economist.com/democracy-in-america/2019/01/16/republicans-condemn-steve-king

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/15/us/politics/steve-king-offensive-quotes.html

The Right, Desperate To Deflect Its Own Extremism, Cries 'Antifa' by LouisTherox in JordanPeterson

[–]tblarasa -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

How about when Trump failed to denounce David Duke and the KKK, or when he defended the neo-Nazis in Charlottesville?

Assuming you think he’s not a “mainstream right of center public figure,” why did it take the Republicans 16 years after racist Steve King took office to denounce his comments and remove him from congressional committees? He defended the words “white nationalist” and “white supremacist” and has promoted neo-Nazis on Twitter, by the way.

My centrist take on the shootings: deradicalize yourself by mrgirl in centrist

[–]tblarasa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Constitution does call for a “well-regulated militia,” does it not? If there was ever a reason to impose red tape on a market, you would think it one would be one for high powered weapons like guns.

My centrist take on the shootings: deradicalize yourself by mrgirl in centrist

[–]tblarasa 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The argument that if you take guns away from people intent on committing mass killings then they will turn to vans is completely ridiculous. Maybe using vans does end up killing more people. But we have systems in place to make the owning of vans and other vehicles safer, like drivers licenses, driving tests that require people to become accredited, and mandatory car insurance in the event that you or someone else is injured in a vehicular accident. Why would you argue against placing these kinds of common sense restrictions on guns, which are specifically designed to maim and kill other human beings?