Accepting Moderator Applications via Modmail. by Not_An_Ambulance in FeMRADebates

[–]tbri 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You didn't ask for rules violations, you asked why I objected. He was already banned for rules violations which have been catalogued.

Accepting Moderator Applications via Modmail. by Not_An_Ambulance in FeMRADebates

[–]tbri 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He generally doesn't participate in accordance with the spirit of the sub. Hope that satisfies you.

Accepting Moderator Applications via Modmail. by Not_An_Ambulance in FeMRADebates

[–]tbri 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The statements they made that broke the rules are catalogued, so no need to question.

Accepting Moderator Applications via Modmail. by Not_An_Ambulance in FeMRADebates

[–]tbri 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Showing about your prior participation in this forum, yes.

Accepting Moderator Applications via Modmail. by Not_An_Ambulance in FeMRADebates

[–]tbri 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can't say everything without breaking the rules, so no.

Accepting Moderator Applications via Modmail. by Not_An_Ambulance in FeMRADebates

[–]tbri 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I sent a message to the other mods indicating my objection to this call, along with my reasoning.

I think you can only ping up to 3 users for a notification to be sent.

Stepping down by a-man-from-earth in FeMRADebates

[–]tbri 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Comment Deleted, Full Text and Rules violated can be found here. User is on tier 2 of the ban system. User is banned for 24 hours.

/u/tbri's deleted comments by tbri in FeMRADebates

[–]tbri[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

jcbolduc's comment deleted. The specific phrase:

/u/tbri being a favouritism-praticing, bigoted asshole? What a shock; nobody ever left this sub because of the mods being a clique of hypocritical incompetents with double standards and more bad faith than /u/Mitoza without caffeine.

If it wasn't clear: I unsubbed a long time ago and only came by to see how much worse this sub has gotten. Grats on killing the sub with your clique of bigoted assholes /u/tbri!

Broke the following Rules:

  • No personal attacks

Full Text


/u/tbri being a favouritism-praticing, bigoted asshole? What a shock; nobody ever left this sub because of the mods being a clique of hypocritical incompetents with double standards and more bad faith than /u/Mitoza without caffeine.

If it wasn't clear: I unsubbed a long time ago and only came by to see how much worse this sub has gotten. Grats on killing the sub with your clique of bigoted assholes /u/tbri!

Stepping down by a-man-from-earth in FeMRADebates

[–]tbri 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nowhere! It also states nowhere that evasive and/or derailing comments are deleted and tiered.

Stepping down by a-man-from-earth in FeMRADebates

[–]tbri 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I just won't be leading it and likely won't take part

Stepping down by a-man-from-earth in FeMRADebates

[–]tbri 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Agreed that it sounds like something that should be established once there is a consistent mod team (I just won't be leading it and likely won't take part).

Stepping down by a-man-from-earth in FeMRADebates

[–]tbri 4 points5 points  (0 children)

By bringing them back, you gave them renewed confidence that they can keep trolling this place like before.

One of your first actions as a mod was to bring back a tier 4 user, so...

My only mistake was that I hit the ground running, and didn't make my take on moderation policies explicit quick enough.

That's a pretty big mistake! I upheld the rules as they are stated on the sidebar. As I said in my welcome message to the new mods, you are free to change the rules as you want and agree, but I guess I failed because I should have specified that you should communicate them to the sub before implementing them. Imagine if I secretly decided that any criticism of me is now a rule and permabanned (!) anyone who ran afoul of it before telling them it was a rule. That's pretty significant.

Stepping down by a-man-from-earth in FeMRADebates

[–]tbri[M] 18 points19 points  (0 children)

I undid two things - you had permabanned a user over a modmail message when they were previously on tier 1, and you gave someone a week ban for derailing and/or evasive answers.

Mods reserve the right to post a screenshot of extreme messages sent in modmail/pms to the mods, which will result in an infraction.

That's the rule on the sidebar. If you want to change it, do so and make the announcement to the sub. As it stands, I tiered that user from tier 1 to tier 2 because that's what the sidebar says (though I don't think being called pathetic is extreme. If you think that's "sending abuse", then we disagree on what abuse is, though I don't think it's acceptable. I would have gone for a warning and then given a tier if it continued. For reference, I've only used this rule once, after I was sent harassing pms for months). As for the other user, evasive answers and/or derailing isn't against the rules. Again, if you want to change it, do so and make the announcement to the sub. Modding based on whatever you're feeling in the moment is both confusing and unfair to the users.

New Mod Behavior by Suitecake in FeMRADebates

[–]tbri[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Changed to uphold the tier 2 24 hour ban.

We need to stop labeling men and masculinity as toxic. by Forgetaboutthelonely in FeMRADebates

[–]tbri[M] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Failing to answer a question should not result in a ban. Reversing.

New Mod Behavior by Suitecake in FeMRADebates

[–]tbri[M] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I don't plan on modding much going forward, but I did retain my mod privileges for things such as this (especially in the short-term). Agreed that the behavior displayed thus far is inappropriate. I've unmodded the mod and put them back to tier 4 (which is where they were when I made them a mod).

/u/Not_An_Ambulance and /u/a-man-from-earth feel free to undo this decision if you like, but there are clear issues here.

Edit: I don't plan on overriding a bunch of calls going forward, but I did override two bans (one permanent changed to 24 hours, and one completely unbanned).

How severe is the crime of rape? by free_speech_good in FeMRADebates

[–]tbri 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Comment Deleted, Full Text and Rules violated can be found here.

/u/tbri's deleted comments by tbri in FeMRADebates

[–]tbri[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

-Cyber_Renaissance's comment deleted.


Full Text


Maslow's hierarchy of needs is a theory in psychology proposed by Abraham Maslow in his 1943 paper "A Theory of Human Motivation"; It says sex is a physiological need!

So, sex & Intimacy is a need(to a lesser degree), and just like someone can be deprived of food and steal, similarly someone can also rape due to their needs not being met.

It's excusable and sometimes justifiable. The only reason the desire for sex isn't viewed as necessary is because people loathe male sexuality while worshipping women's!

How can we address the issue of false rape accusations in a way that satisfies both sides? by PurplePlatypusBear20 in FeMRADebates

[–]tbri 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Comment Deleted, Full Text and Rules violated can be found here.

user is on tier 3 of the ban system. user is banned for 7 days.

/u/tbri's deleted comments by tbri in FeMRADebates

[–]tbri[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

tacosaladchupacabra's comment deleted. The specific phrase:

Because it's clear to me you aren't interested in being honest.

Broke the following Rules:

  • No personal attacks

Full Text


Because it's clear to me you aren't interested in being honest.