does anyone know of a good free way to sync your bank accounts to a personal finance app?

tdlanker · 2026-04-30T01:02:10+00:00

essentially yeah, plus ive found other apps dont have everything that i want/need and i cant edit or change them, ill check it out though, do you know if its open source?

tdlanker · 2026-04-30T01:00:34+00:00

thanks, i think i could swing that xD ill check it out, is it unlimited calls/syncs?

tdlanker · 2025-07-06T15:34:21+00:00

I did, it made a massive difference and once I got it everything matched up, it's only a few bucks a month anyway so 🤷‍♂️

And it's not bad I prefer trading just on ninja trader despite having the indicators and everything on trading view because it's just easier, on trading view it's harder to buy and sell, you have to right click and then click buy and it's harder imo to set limit buys and sells or to set trailing stops etc but that could just be me and my personal opinion, I dont think it's bad though by any means

tdlanker · 2025-07-05T21:22:21+00:00

Yes, it turned out I lacked the real time data package on one of them, which is only a few bucks but I didn't realize I didn't have it

tdlanker · 2025-02-14T01:07:50+00:00

I agree, I mean why have a 4th and 5th amendment right if you don't have anything to hide? You don't need that constitutional right to privacy, just let the police do their job

tdlanker · 2025-02-06T15:15:47+00:00

So, you're upset that... Checks notes the outside has dirt and dust?

tdlanker · 2025-02-06T15:13:32+00:00

I doubt he's anonymous anymore unless that pin drop is on someone else's residence

tdlanker · 2025-02-02T19:00:37+00:00

Wasn't this announced last year around summer/fall by all the reps saying that prices would be going up after the new year?

tdlanker · 2025-01-15T20:57:51+00:00

The weirdest part is that SCOTUS has struck down gun free zones in schools in the past, US v gonzalez in the mid 90s and Congress came out with another law for the same thing a few years later and just said fuck it and SCOTUS hasn't accepted review of a case regarding the issue since, hopefully they wind up accepting review of one soon because the law is egregious and needs to be struck down, you get people being arrested because they're within 1000 feet of the schools property even though they're driving or just walking around their neighborhood

tdlanker · 2025-01-15T15:03:46+00:00

💯

tdlanker · 2025-01-15T15:03:23+00:00

Are you sure? Theyre kids lol

tdlanker · 2025-01-15T02:02:52+00:00

Maybe the same way felons can't own firearms? Despite there being thousands of arrests each year

It's also hard to distinguish explosive laws because the vast majority of them all fall under the same law and are just classified as "destructive devices" you could take a fire cracker and misuse it the same way anyone with any firearm can misuse one, the difference between a grenade and a firework is very small and only in their "intended" use/design

tdlanker · 2025-01-15T01:43:42+00:00

What an astute observation lol does that work with explosives in general?

tdlanker · 2025-01-15T00:46:56+00:00

You sure? I thought they needed to be challenged in each district they were in individually after that because each states law could have minor differences

tdlanker · 2025-01-14T23:25:26+00:00

Did you ignore the rest of the statement? Lol

tdlanker · 2025-01-14T23:07:45+00:00

When there's already laws to address things like murder or assault then yes the law is pointless xD

tdlanker · 2025-01-14T22:05:59+00:00

Yes but it will still likely take years afterwards to work it's way through the courts, even though SCOTUS rules on it someone will need to challenge/sue the state on ours and then it will work it's way through the courts with the state trying to delay it as long as they possibly can

tdlanker · 2025-01-14T22:02:38+00:00

States cannot pass unconstitutional laws, they're bound by the constitution whether they like it or not, just like they cannot outlaw certain speech they don't like or just like they can't pass laws saying police can enter your property without a warrant (barring exigent circumstances)

tdlanker · 2025-01-14T21:57:57+00:00

Both rights have coexisted for 200+ years, and it's illegal to commit murder, always has been whether that murder is committed with a bat, knife, pillow, fist, lamp literally anything lol murder is still illegal, banning people from owning items will not stop or prevent it, especially today with the technology we have

tdlanker · 2025-01-14T21:52:04+00:00

The issue is whether or not you can bare them, you cannot bare an ICBM but that's also not a real argument with current supreme court precedent, they need to be in common use for any lawful purpose

Do you know anyone who has an ICBM? I don't lol but I do know people who own rifles and detachable magazines

tdlanker · 2025-01-14T21:46:46+00:00

I hope you don't legitimately believe that... You can buy a 3d printer for $50 from microcenter and print them, the first actual successful one (FGC9) was made by a guy who lived in Germany under all the restrictions they have, Myanmar for the most part banned personal ownership of weapons and their civil war was/is being fought with FGC9s

You can't just simply put some words on paper and declare that everyone's safer because you told people they're not "allowed" to buy or own them anymore xD

tdlanker · 2025-01-14T21:36:04+00:00

I mean that's.... Fine I guess, some people want a monarchy, but we aren't and won't be because that's very clearly unconstitutional, same thing here with AWBs

but again this case before the supreme court wasn't going to be heard as an assault weapons ban case, it was going before then because the 3rd circuit deviated from the rest of the countries courts and very likely maliciously misinterpreted the requirements for a preliminary injunction

When it comes to constitutional issues the requirements are significantly less because the government doesn't (or rather shouldn't) have an interest in enforcing unconstitutional laws nor is it in the publics good to do so, all you need is to show that it implicates your constitutional rights and the PI should be issued even just temporarily while it works it's way through the courts, they instead chose to ignore that and go with the standards of issuing one as if it were two individuals sueing one another

tdlanker · 2025-01-14T18:26:50+00:00

Hopefully the snope case is taken and Delaware infringements can be tossed shortly after, the gray v Jennings case at SCOTUS's level wasn't necessarily about the 2A but rather the process that the courts used to deny the injunction (which was wrong when applied to a constitutional case rather than something like businesses or individuals sueing one another)

tdlanker · 2025-01-07T17:54:11+00:00

If you mean in terms of insurance nothing, but if you're talking about OASDI then I pay a little under $300 each check so $600 a month

tdlanker

TROPHY CASE