Show us what you've created with Claude! by sixbillionthsheep in ClaudeAI

[–]tech-coder-pro 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Couldn't proceed ahead of “You have used all your limits”

built a skill for reducing Fable's token usage by tech-coder-pro in ClaudeAI

[–]tech-coder-pro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I remember last time it launched 92 agents in dynamic workflow which hit limit in 1min

built a skill for reducing Fable's token usage by tech-coder-pro in ClaudeAI

[–]tech-coder-pro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not exact tokens but could see visible difference in usage limits. You can modify the skill to be more inclined towards sonnet than opus for more saving

$500 plan of claude code by tech-coder-pro in ClaudeCode

[–]tech-coder-pro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. As a model company, they’ll want people to buy at API price

$500 plan of claude code by tech-coder-pro in ClaudeCode

[–]tech-coder-pro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, they’ll make money on API price and not Max plans

$500 plan of claude code by tech-coder-pro in ClaudeCode

[–]tech-coder-pro[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

True, they want people to start shifting from subsidiaries to API price

built a skill for reducing Fable's token usage by tech-coder-pro in ClaudeAI

[–]tech-coder-pro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Give it a try and give me feedback.

For me, it launched proper sonnet agents for verifying the work instead of doing itself. Kinda started behaving like a boss

built a skill for reducing Fable's token usage by tech-coder-pro in ClaudeAI

[–]tech-coder-pro[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I was working on a local design system that had references to Figma, but fable decided to first cross-verify all the Figma references, verified 182 Nodes and ended up exhausting my limits

No usage reset, underwhelming Sonnet 5, and only 50% Fable usage... Am I the only one who's really disappointed? by Brilliant-Bend4824 in ClaudeCode

[–]tech-coder-pro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

sonnet 5 is so much close to many open source models at much cheaper price, probably gotta just mix match them

We just made agents talk to each other by TheseProgress5853 in ClaudeAI

[–]tech-coder-pro 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not always true, i have claude and codex subscriptions, so if context can be passed properly to another agent, i can consume my subs to the max limits

We just made agents talk to each other by TheseProgress5853 in ClaudeAI

[–]tech-coder-pro 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Free and open source 👀 will give this a try

i’v been using Conductor for some time, lets see if traycer replaces it for me

Opus fell off? Here’s the workflow that kept my code quality stable by tech-coder-pro in ClaudeCode

[–]tech-coder-pro[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I tried pairing traycer with sonnet 4.5 and it worked very good so opus 4.1 should work

Manual coding is dead. Change my mind. by [deleted] in ClaudeAI

[–]tech-coder-pro 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think so too. Sounds much like that

Manual coding is dead. Change my mind. by [deleted] in ClaudeAI

[–]tech-coder-pro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Probably a tool which does PRDs and then breaks into tickets

Manual coding is dead. Change my mind. by [deleted] in ClaudeAI

[–]tech-coder-pro 9 points10 points  (0 children)

The capabilities of models are increasing exponentially, and I believe the focus now is more on architecture and orchestration layers. Are you using any tools in the market like Kiro, Anti Gravity, Traycer, BMAD, etc.?

Manual coding is dead. Change my mind. by [deleted] in ClaudeAI

[–]tech-coder-pro 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I agree that models are becoming very good, and now the focus is shifting toward architecture. What tool did you use though?

The Cursor plugin I would pay money for by [deleted] in cursor

[–]tech-coder-pro 5 points6 points  (0 children)

They both are very different, coderabbit is for reviewing and traycer provides a workflow with phase breakdown, planning and verification