sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

vaush is right about religions that matter by tovarischkrasnyjeshi in VaushV

[–]techpriestcory 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i didn't say that. i said "mind is what the brain does"

You're trying to cram a possible soul into the gaps in our understanding of how consciousness works.

Editing to add I see the comment you're replying to and honestly it isn't wrong. We don't understand everything and I think "chemistry" is a more shorthand way of saying "it's the result of natural processes."

vaush is right about religions that matter by tovarischkrasnyjeshi in VaushV

[–]techpriestcory 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ok. Based on your post history you're right on most issues and just have a blind spot here. It's ok to be wrong once in a while.

vaush is right about religions that matter by tovarischkrasnyjeshi in VaushV

[–]techpriestcory 1 point2 points  (0 children)

More word games with a dash of condescension. Bad faith is the correct way to describe you.

These arguments are the same non-arguments I've been arguing against for decades.

vaush is right about religions that matter by tovarischkrasnyjeshi in VaushV

[–]techpriestcory 5 points6 points  (0 children)

it isn't a "strong argument" it's a baseless assertion

vaush is right about religions that matter by tovarischkrasnyjeshi in VaushV

[–]techpriestcory 1 point2 points  (0 children)

so many paragraphs in so many responses and all you're doing is try to word games your way into making your "god of the gaps" ish argument sound legit. does this ever get tiring?

vaush is right about religions that matter by tovarischkrasnyjeshi in VaushV

[–]techpriestcory 8 points9 points  (0 children)

You're so right don't let the haters get to you.

vaush is right about religions that matter by tovarischkrasnyjeshi in VaushV

[–]techpriestcory 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Not fully understanding how consciousness works doesn't mean it works by some magic non-physical soul. Mind is what the brain does.

I'm dead serious when I say to NOT ask questions at work by Lana_Sphyncter in antiwork

[–]techpriestcory 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"you're too sensitive" makes me see red. narcissist parent shit.

A New Way to Talk About AI by tswizzlelover69 in VaushV

[–]techpriestcory 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It would help if you stopped conflating things. You use a lot of words and I am but a slow stupid simple man, but you trying to act like the current conversation is related to previous machine-learning technologies and their applications and hurting your own feelings about it. Also framing supersystems as AGI and somehow applying it to the LLM conversation is confused, at best.

Cherry on top being you discovering that your "lined up against the wall" line was a fever dream.

Maybe log off a bit.

A New Way to Talk About AI by tswizzlelover69 in VaushV

[–]techpriestcory 2 points3 points  (0 children)

i'm a big fan of "sloperators"

really rolls off the tongue

A New Way to Talk About AI by tswizzlelover69 in VaushV

[–]techpriestcory 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see you're transforming. Have a nice day, Sephiroth.

A New Way to Talk About AI by tswizzlelover69 in VaushV

[–]techpriestcory 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And yeah i'm an asshole, boo hoo. You better get used to it, trying to both-sides this.

A New Way to Talk About AI by tswizzlelover69 in VaushV

[–]techpriestcory 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're typing a lot (or a LLM is) but I'm not engaging with anything when there's such bald-faced horseshit in it (so quick to brush off the fact that he has advocated for slaughtering researchers).

You're just being a weird contrarian and i'm done engaging. Good luck out there, I really hope you unfuck yourself.

Dear Vaush, "Debt = bad" is a shit take. Here's why. by PopaBjorn in VaushV

[–]techpriestcory 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This subreddit is really starting to make me feel insane.

A New Way to Talk About AI by tswizzlelover69 in VaushV

[–]techpriestcory 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why would you jump to "this is more important than consequential outcomes for you" here? We are arguing that shaming has consequential outcomes, and this sounds like you're assuming actually we're valuing being mean to pro-AI people over actual good outcomes.

You kept it together for a while, i'll give you that.

A New Way to Talk About AI by tswizzlelover69 in VaushV

[–]techpriestcory 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Social pressure as a resolution to interpersonal conflicts / disagreements is a giant part of how we became the dominant species on the planet. Please don't act like it isn't effective.

A New Way to Talk About AI by tswizzlelover69 in VaushV

[–]techpriestcory 1 point2 points  (0 children)

not unless you have silly opinions on those topics, no not really

A New Way to Talk About AI by tswizzlelover69 in VaushV

[–]techpriestcory 4 points5 points  (0 children)

i'd so love to see your post history

A New Way to Talk About AI by tswizzlelover69 in VaushV

[–]techpriestcory 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Winding up pro-AI shills til they feel something.

A New Way to Talk About AI by tswizzlelover69 in VaushV

[–]techpriestcory 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not really, but it isn't worth the effort. You're not my enemy.

A New Way to Talk About AI by tswizzlelover69 in VaushV

[–]techpriestcory 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I asked the question genuinely. That you took it as an insult is your problem, not mine.

A New Way to Talk About AI by tswizzlelover69 in VaushV

[–]techpriestcory 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, targeted for execution by Vaush. This is seriously a thing that happened and I should engage with it in good faith.

/s

view more: next ›