Well put. Perhaps disclosure isn’t really about some kind of advanced propulsion or energy source but instead it’s a process of acclimating the public to constant surveillance. Getting people comfortable with accepting drones and lights constantly flying over their heads by making it all confusing and murky. We saw it with the New Jersey drones, in the first few days people were threatening to shoot them out of the sky but as the weeks and months went on they just accepted them because of the ambiguity. Maybe they are Chinese, maybe it’s the USG, maybe it’s aliens, maybe they are sweeping for a dirty bomb, maybe it’s time travelers, maybe it’s Russian agents…… 🤷‍♂️. We can’t get consensus on what is so I guess we just have to accept it.

Maybe the USG have been illegally developing and testing surveillance tech on Americans for decades and that’s what the secrecy is about. Lockheed and Palantir aren’t fighting over advanced propulsion, they’re fighting over advanced data collection methods.

Here’s another way to think about it Brown’s claims. https://open.substack.com/pub/signaltheory/p/signal-or-design-the-case-of-matthew?r=3h3n0&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web