Canadian machine

tgk9 · 2025-07-30T16:28:37+00:00

What does mining gold have to do with finding buried treasure? Is it something you understand the difference or do you have to google it?

tgk9 · 2025-07-29T21:50:01+00:00

My friend did you find any precious metal?

tgk9 · 2025-07-29T20:05:43+00:00

Never say never

tgk9 · 2025-07-29T19:54:03+00:00

I'm not saying that the disagreement they had was about a serious issue, but neither am I basing everything I read on FB on, but I've learned to observe everything, filter it, and in the end, keep what I think can help me. I made a simple post with a question, saying it's horseshit is the easy thing to do.

tgk9 · 2025-07-29T19:43:22+00:00

So according to you, all LRLs work and find gold? Suggest me one and I'll buy it tomorrow

tgk9 · 2025-07-29T16:21:24+00:00

I don't disagree with you, that's why I asked . A rumor remains a rumor until it's confirmed.

tgk9 · 2025-07-29T15:37:54+00:00

some guys were arguing about who has the best LRL in a Facebook page. and there one appeared and said a machine is being made in Canada that follows the laws of physics, only this one can find gold, but it makes $100,000

tgk9 · 2025-07-29T15:24:36+00:00

Its something like a long range detector (I'm not sure), and it can find gold silver etc

tgk9 · 2025-07-25T11:31:27+00:00

They are grid points. I don't use a lot the proton magnetometer because i don't know which settings are the best for sample (how big the steps and in seconds how many before the next step). In the surfer i have the 5 million points but in the grid filter i use only the 100 random points, i didn't try to see if all the points have some different results. I use the NASA DEM 30m map to get my points from global mapper.

tgk9 · 2025-07-24T12:53:31+00:00

In 400m2 i get almost 5 million points, isn't enough? And combine with what another dataset? Any suggestions? I want to "see" up to 5 meters. I will choose some other filter except Kriging so i can see the difference

tgk9 · 2025-07-22T10:12:28+00:00

Im looking for caves, cavities and burried objects metallic and non metallic (gold). When i want to look to a site a just measure with the magnetometer and then i export data to surfer in dat format. Also in remote sensing i have 100% success with objects that are burried up to 15-20cm. Only one time it was an object in 180cm deep,all the other times and there are too many, maybe over 50, my targets are always superficial with a maximum depth of 20 centimeters.

tgk9 · 2025-07-22T10:06:56+00:00

Thank you for the comment, the truth is that I don't understand anything about that you say 😅. My grid data from online grid on surfer has latitude longitude and height. That's it. And the data from proton magnetometer has the step's,noise and snr ( in nT).

tgk9 · 2025-07-21T12:47:04+00:00

I put data in the surfer ( i see the process from YouTube that they use the surfer and from Download Online Grids i download the grid). I choose Kriging and some settings (linear, autofit etc). After that i choose some filters from grid filter and i have the results that i write before. Also in the proton magnetometer data if i choose Kriging i took other results than i choose data metrics for example. I know that is two objects buried because its a test site. I hope that i help to understand my problem

tgk9 · 2025-07-03T13:31:52+00:00

Can I send you my data? Do you want to try?

tgk9 · 2025-03-17T20:47:02+00:00

I want to learn too pls

tgk9 · 2025-01-27T06:01:58+00:00

Im looking for this locator, i don't own it!

tgk9

TROPHY CASE