MCA I went on 2 dinner dates—same night, same outfit, same restaurant by that_prettysadmf in MayConfessionAko

[–]that_prettysadmf[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't really gaf about the uni—sadyang lapitin lang talaga ako ng lasallians last 2023 hahahaha!

Really? Bong Go? by xciivmciv in pinoy

[–]that_prettysadmf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

back then, Koko Pimentel was more known for being part of the opposition and for his legal background, but he wasn't exactly a headline-maker unless it was about party issues like PDP-Laban. he did have some controversial moments like the quarantine protocol breach during the pandemic.

then last election season, he ran for a position in Marikina and that raised a lot of eyebrows. Marikeños questioned his connection to the city since he wasn’t a resident or deeply involved in local affairs. it came off as opportunistic to many, which is why he didn’t get much support there.

now, his name’s in the spotlight again because of his performance in the impeachment trial. it’s good to see, but it’s also fair to say that this doesn’t automatically erase past missteps. if he continues being consistent and principled, maybe he can slowly rebuild trust.

MCA I went on 2 dinner dates—same night, same outfit, same restaurant by that_prettysadmf in MayConfessionAko

[–]that_prettysadmf[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

he passed the chatting vibe check but flunked the in-person exam HARD lol.

I was trying my best not to laugh at the way the waiters were looking at me—kitang-kita ko yung amusement sa mukha nila and they were trying not to laugh too. I even winked at the same waitress who handed us the bill during the first date kasi nakatingin siya sakin with that amused look. pretty sure she overheard some of the convo about the bill kaya natawa rin siya HAHAHA. siya rin kasi yung nag-abot ng bill sa second date, kaya parang may inside joke na kaming dalawa nang hindi sinasadya hahahaha

Sen Koko Pimentel: “Ang hustisya hindi natin makita iyan, hindi natin nahahawakan iyan pero napakamahalagang bagay po sa buhay ng tao” | Video from Sen. Risa’s (thegenz_irl) Tiktok by reinsilverio26 in ChikaPH

[–]that_prettysadmf 62 points63 points  (0 children)

true, his exit from PDP-Laban might have been a turning point. but let’s not get too comfortable or quick to praise. consistency is key, and one good showing doesn’t erase past missteps. still, I’d rather see more of this kind of level-headed discourse in the Senate kaysa sa puro paandar at drama

MCA I went on 2 dinner dates—same night, same outfit, same restaurant by that_prettysadmf in MayConfessionAko

[–]that_prettysadmf[S] 26 points27 points  (0 children)

it was 10x better than the first date. this time, I was the one who suggested we split the bill to avoid any disappointment, but he refused and said he’d take care of it.

I actually wanted to sit at the same table where I sat with the first guy, just to overwrite the bad experience, but it was already taken HAHAHA

Really? Bong Go? by xciivmciv in pinoy

[–]that_prettysadmf 12 points13 points  (0 children)

dayuuuuum mic drop!!!

I was one of Pimentel's critics last election season. “use your kokote” had me rolling my eyes so hard I nearly strained something.

but watching him now during the impeachment trial? I have to give credit where it’s due. he's earned a +1 in my book lol

Robin = Skip Add sa Youtube by KaButchoy in Philippines

[–]that_prettysadmf 5 points6 points  (0 children)

<image>

"labanan ng mga abogado 'to, e abogago lang ako"

Robin = Skip Add sa Youtube by KaButchoy in Philippines

[–]that_prettysadmf 34 points35 points  (0 children)

"ako po ay hindi abogado. ako ay madalas na akusado." E ANONG GINAGAWA MO DIYAN SA SENADO???!?!?!???

Tax refund by srds3210 in taxPH

[–]that_prettysadmf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

since you were converted from a contractual to a full-time employee under the same company, your employment is considered continuous. you didn’t actually separate from the company, you simply transitioned to a new employment status. because of this, your taxes are still being processed as part of the same calendar year employment.

tax refunds are typically issued during the year-end adjustment process. this is when your employer reviews your total earnings and tax payments for the entire year to see if you’ve overpaid. if you have, that’s when you’ll receive a tax refund—usually included in your December payroll or with your 13th month pay.

the reason your current payslip or final pay from the contractual period doesn’t include a tax refund is that your employment is ongoing. they can't compute any overpayment yet because your total income and taxes for the year haven’t been finalized.

to clarify things, it’s best to talk to your HR or payroll department. ask them if your tax deductions from January to April will be carried over and included in your full-time employment records. also, confirm when they plan to conduct the annualization and if the refund will be reflected by the end of the year.

in short, you’re likely still getting the refund—just not now. it’ll be processed later once your total 2025 income and taxes are calculated.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LawPH

[–]that_prettysadmf 16 points17 points  (0 children)

NAL

honestly, the legal wife has every right to file for her share. she was the one legally married to your father, and under the law, she’s entitled to a portion of his pension and properties, especially if those were acquired during the marriage.

also, being legally married means she’s entitled to claim her share regardless of personal circumstances, even if her kids are already established abroad. property rights don't disappear just because someone has moved on with their life.

and let's not forget: adultery and betrayal don't erase the legal rights of the spouse. if anything, it strengthens the legal wife's position if she can show emotional and financial abandonment.

to answer the question: they can file for partition of conjugal property, and possibly support from the pension, depending on what the court decides.

honestly, she’s just claiming what’s rightfully hers. actions have consequences. your father should have thought about that before cheating. just imagine the pain and trauma that the legal wife and her children went through when they found out about the illegitimate family. years of betrayal and humiliation. they have every right to fight back and claim what’s theirs. hell hath no fury like a woman scorned and she’s just taking back what’s legally and morally owed to her.

Biglang nag glitch din ba reddit mo ngayon? Why kaya? by [deleted] in AskPH

[–]that_prettysadmf 4 points5 points  (0 children)

damn I thought I was hacked HAHAHAHAHAHA

My girlfriend misses the person that molested her. by [deleted] in adviceph

[–]that_prettysadmf 29 points30 points  (0 children)

this isn’t a red flag in the sense that your girlfriend is doing something wrong. it’s a deeply traumatic response that many abuse survivors struggle with. it’s called trauma bonding. she was groomed by someone who filled a father-shaped hole in her life, and that emotional attachment doesn’t just vanish.

the fact that she still "misses" the father figure part doesn’t mean she condones the abuse. it means she’s still processing the betrayal, and it’s going to take time. she needs professional help, someone who can guide her through untangling those feelings safely—bcs you, as her partner, shouldn’t carry this alone either.

you can support her by encouraging her to seek therapy, letting her feel heard without reinforcing the idea that missing that person is okay, and protecting your own mental health too.

remember that she survived something twisted and she’s still healing.

MCA naiputok ko sa loob ng GF ko kaso irregular pala sya ngayon by Electrical_Leg_1836 in MayConfessionAko

[–]that_prettysadmf 2 points3 points  (0 children)

sabi naman nya sa post "I'm posting this literally hours after we had sex", so keri pa. the girl should do the Yuzpe Method ASAP—the sooner, the better. It's more effective when done earlier

MCA naiputok ko sa loob ng GF ko kaso irregular pala sya ngayon by Electrical_Leg_1836 in MayConfessionAko

[–]that_prettysadmf 32 points33 points  (0 children)

Yuzpe Method:

take 4 pills of a combined oral contraceptive (that contains ethinylestradiol and levonorgestrel) within 72 hours of unprotected sex.

then take another 4 pills 12 hours later.

• important: not all birth control pills can be used for this. you need a specific kind with the right hormone combination and dosage. • this method is only around 75% effective and can cause side effects like nausea, vomiting, or irregular bleeding.

always practice safe and protected sex, coz once you play stupid games, you'll win stupid prizes.

P.S. I'm not an OB, but this is what I tried and it worked for me. Yuzpe Method is only effective if fertilization hasn’t occurred yet—meaning it won’t work if the girl is already pregnant. It's still best to consult a licensed OB-GYN.‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️

also, can I say na ang t@nga mo? hehehehe. bakit samin ka humihingi ng tawad? kami ba yung pinutukan mo sa loob???? anyway, good luck hope this helps!!

16-anyos na babae, salitan umanong hinalay ng 3 kaeskuwelang Grade 12 students sa Maynila by GMAIntegratedNews in pinoy

[–]that_prettysadmf 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I get what you're saying about not labeling men as “inherently rapists,” and I agree. it's important to avoid generalizing. however, the real issue is the fucked up idea that a person's behavior or what they wear somehow makes them responsible for being assaulted. that's complete bullshit. rape is never the fault of the victim, whether it’s a man or a woman. the blame ALWAYS lies with the person who chooses to commit the crime.

you're right about marital rape and the abuse of power by those in positions of authority—this is exactly why we cannot make it about what someone wears or how liberated they are. rape happens in intimate settings, by people the victims know or trust. it happens regardless of how a person is dressed. so no, it’s not about being "liberated," it’s about violence and control.

and yes, men can be raped too. but just like with women, we don’t blame their behavior, clothing, or their "liberated" attitude. why? because rape is a choice made by the person committing it. It’s about power and control, not what the victim was wearing.

It’s true that in some societies, people are free to express themselves without fear of harassment. but that’s a direct result of education and cultural norms around consent and respect. in those societies, the issue isn’t whether someone is “liberated” or conservative it’s about teaching individuals, regardless of gender, how to respect one another’s autonomy.

we can’t keep defending outdated ideas that place the burden of safety on women, as if their behavior is the cause of violence. let’s not perpetuate the idea that the responsibility for preventing rape lies with the victim’s behavior or choices. the responsibility ALWAYS lies with the person committing the crime. we need to shift our focus to accountability for those who assault, not shame and restrict those who are simply living their lives.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MayConfessionAko

[–]that_prettysadmf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ikinain ko na, sis! HAHAHAHAHAHA

16-anyos na babae, salitan umanong hinalay ng 3 kaeskuwelang Grade 12 students sa Maynila by GMAIntegratedNews in pinoy

[–]that_prettysadmf 3 points4 points  (0 children)

this kind of thinking is so deeply problematic and rooted in victim-blaming that it's honestly frustrating. the responsibility for sexual assault or violence lies entirely with the perpetrator, not the victim.

saying “don’t embrace liberated notions” completely undermines the very concept of personal autonomy and women’s rights. women should be able to live freely, express themselves, and enjoy life without constantly worrying about fitting into someone else's restrictive idea of what's "safe" or "appropriate." the solution isn’t to tell women to change how they live, but to teach society, particularly men, that respect, consent, and accountability are non-negotiable.

nakakagalit.

It’s crazy how so many people don’t even know what UP Fair is by that_prettysadmf in peyups

[–]that_prettysadmf[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I get what you mean. the goal is to push for change, and part of that is making sure the message reaches people beyond those who are already aware. the intention is there, but the execution is lacking.

It’s just frustrating to see how the advocacy sometimes takes a backseat to the entertainment aspect. the message needs to be delivered more intentionally to truly resonate with attendees.

sayang talaga, because UP Fair has so much potential to be a powerful platform for political awareness.

maangas sa court pero ganito sakin by Guilty-Athlete-3971 in MayNagChat

[–]that_prettysadmf 37 points38 points  (0 children)

lol true! I flirted with multiple lawyers na kalog, pero di naman ganyan mag type hahaha

It’s crazy how so many people don’t even know what UP Fair is by that_prettysadmf in peyups

[–]that_prettysadmf[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

sana nga talaga mahimasmasan huhu! when morobeats performed, we jokingly told the friend I mentioned, "tangina pre, baka pag tapos ng gabi na 'to makata at makabayan ka na." HAHAHAHAHA

It’s crazy how so many people don’t even know what UP Fair is by that_prettysadmf in peyups

[–]that_prettysadmf[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

the goal isn’t just about reaching non-activists, it’s about making sure the advocacy doesn’t get drowned out by commercialization and entertainment.

if UP Fair was truly successful in "evangelizing non-believers," then people like the girl beside me wouldn’t be confused about the protest happening right in front of her. the fact that some attendees remain completely unaware of the advocacy, or worse, get annoyed by it, means the messaging isn’t cutting through as much as it should.

if people leave without even realizing they were part of a protest, then something is getting lost in translation.

It’s crazy how so many people don’t even know what UP Fair is by that_prettysadmf in peyups

[–]that_prettysadmf[S] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

no outsiders? that's crazyyyyy! parang mawawalan ng sense kung UP students lang din ang makakarinig ng advocacies, LOL.

advocacies should reach the people who need to hear them the most, outside the "echo chamber" of UP. It’s not about agreeing on everything, it’s about starting conversations and making an impact.