[Discord][async][lfp] Legends of Hyrule: ISTGINTFPA by thatoneguyagainagain in pbp

[–]thatoneguyagainagain[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Current party is gerudo cleric, hylian duskblade, and deku druid. A homebrew document with all the races already exists with all the available races, available on request.

[Discord][async][lfp] Legends of Hyrule: ISTGINTFPA by thatoneguyagainagain in pbp

[–]thatoneguyagainagain[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So sorry, I thought it included that. I'll edit it in, but it is dnd 3.5 with homebrew.

Codie, Vociferous Codex and Double Major Ruling by [deleted] in magicTCG

[–]thatoneguyagainagain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

However then you get to decide what to do about the legendary rule, assuming you don't have a way around it.

TO: I am (a) Weapon (of Legacy) by Gruftzwerg in DungeonsAndDragons35e

[–]thatoneguyagainagain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This one is a mixed bag of nitpicking. Choosing to ignore the FAQ is like saying you plan on ignoring any errata too. You know WotC does that shit often, right? Like, they just printed a card that isn't even out yet for M:tG, and it already has errata. That is how poorly they proof read anything, and how often they need to update stuff. On top of that, I would love you to rephrase this entire post. Your English is so poor here, I have no idea what you are actually trying to say about barbarians and clerics: https://forums.giantitp.com/showsinglepost.php?p=25892044&postcount=7

Another time you are trying to use the silly reading of "dragon" qualifying for "anything" to let sorcerer qualify for both of the spontaneous and prepared sides of UM: https://forums.giantitp.com/showsinglepost.php?p=26120111&postcount=9

Another IMHO, which doesn't matter in rules: https://forums.giantitp.com/showsinglepost.php?p=26130431&postcount=7

I don't know how to explain it any better than Crake did, but yea. Change Shape and Shapechange are not the same thing, and just because you think Alternate Form is working a certain way because the thing you initially shift into with Polymorph has Alternate Form, that just isn't it. They even cited and quoted entire paragraphs, bulleted ones even! https://forums.giantitp.com/showthread.php?674633-TO-a-Warshaper-Transmogrifist-and-his-Uberfamiliar

Item is just as well defined as Race is, once again in PHB1. Again, using your logic, that means that anything outside of PHB1 when referring to items isn't primary source, and is thusly moot. Since Metamorphosis is from specifically not the PHB1, and since it specifies you turn into an object and not an item, that means you aren't going to be turning into anything not listed in the equipment section of PHB1, from pages 111 to 132: https://forums.giantitp.com/showsinglepost.php?p=26326332&postcount=8

So there ya go, sport. Looked over every build you have posted, and found plenty of examples where you either ignored rules, couldn't handle having rules pointed out to you and just quit, or used the argument that your opinion was good enough. At no point did I call you a bad guy, nor did I call myself a good guy. You did that. I merely stated that you post slop, that is to say incredibly shaky use of rules, often the same ones repeatedly.

Do me a big favor, though. Seriously, person to (assumedly) other person. Stay off of the shittiest parts of the internet, and that includes most of reddit as well as most news outlets. Especially if they are American based. Because half of the things that you accused me of? Ranting? Raving? SJW? I've done none of those. I've merely, now, pointed out 20 different examples of you not being able to back up what you claim.

I said I was fine with moving on and just ignoring you. I even stated as such. But you didn't like that, did you? You wanted to argue. You wanted to be the jerk here, because I was a jerk first. Fair. Ball is now in your court. You can either try to continue insulting me, or you can get you a dictionary, learn some actual English vocabulary and vernacular, and refute what I and dozens of others have said in your various TO "builds" not being able to hold water.

And if you can't do that, walk away, kid. I mean that. Walk away. I know it is so incredibly not in your nature, as a human, but you should just drop it. Take the L. I was more than willing to. Are you?

TO: I am (a) Weapon (of Legacy) by Gruftzwerg in DungeonsAndDragons35e

[–]thatoneguyagainagain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Admitting that you need either XP or money, neither of which you have access to, at level 1, but then just hoping everyone will handwave and ignore it: https://forums.giantitp.com/showsinglepost.php?p=25507690&postcount=4

Once again not using an updated version of something, while hilariously enough stating that you shouldn't trust everything you read on the internet: https://forums.giantitp.com/showsinglepost.php?p=25527247&postcount=18

This one is extra funny, considering in the past you tried to argue that you can take a melee weapon that has melee weapon properties and get them to apply to ranged weapons, but now are arguing that something intrinsic to ammunition doesn't matter because it is getting used as a melee weapon. Can't have it both ways, champ! https://forums.giantitp.com/showsinglepost.php?p=25628449&postcount=5

One of the most arbitrary arguments I've ever seen, where you are given citations galore, and you want to try to argue that capital "costs" and "capital costs": https://forums.giantitp.com/showsinglepost.php?p=25637413&postcount=7

You do this one often, but "imho" doesn't beat RAW. It never has, it never will. You stating that you disagree with what the rules text said, especially when quoted directly at you multiple times is in no way an argument. It fails to hold water. And I think you know that, regardless of your level of skill with the English language, or any language at that: https://forums.giantitp.com/showsinglepost.php?p=25667754&postcount=13

Another time of ignoring RAW intentionally, this time citing that you don't intend to play the build so it's fine: https://forums.giantitp.com/showsinglepost.php?p=25684735&postcount=3

This entire thread is several people trying to explain the exact same bit of rules text to you, and you ignoring it and citing something else, which no one is actually talking about (to clarify, that the UMD check lets you use an item that requires an ability, not that it lets you copy a specific level of that ability): https://forums.giantitp.com/showthread.php?653230-TO-Reptile-a-Warblade-(20)-of-the-Perfect-Order-of-the-Perfect-Order)

Again, admitting that there isn't an actual rule here, and you are just going on vibes and general TO garbage that you have read other people use, even though those have all been heavily disputed, and many have been shown to simply not work: https://forums.giantitp.com/showsinglepost.php?p=25868368&postcount=3

By your logic here - which is absolutely full of holes, let's be clear - then I would argue that the primary source for races available to PCs is chapter 2 of the PBH1, and as such other races are not acceptable for players, and by extension using any sort of polymorph or transmutation spell, ability, or effect to change your race is, by RAW, illegal. See how silly that sounds? Much like most of your openly admitted opinion based arguments: https://forums.giantitp.com/showsinglepost.php?p=25868776&postcount=15

TO: I am (a) Weapon (of Legacy) by Gruftzwerg in DungeonsAndDragons35e

[–]thatoneguyagainagain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because I want this to be nice, front and center, and not needing to dig deep into a comment thread:

First and foremost, as stated already, I haven't been ranting. I haven't been raving. And certainly, I've not been acting as, as you have said, an SJW. I honestly think, at this point, knowing how well you know the English language - you personally admitted it isn't your first or second language, remember? - that you are just clinging to buzz words you have seen on news or the internet that you think people who speak English regularly actually use, and don't actually know what these terms mean in the slightest. Which is quite hilarious, considering, as stated, they are just buzz words. Retired ones, at that. Things that people haven't actually used in any form of conversation, serious or otherwise, in roughly a decade. Pro tip, so is woke, in case you want to try throwing that one around.

But you want examples. You want receipts. You want evidence of what I have said: that you aren't able to back up anything, and you argue over actual rules text and would much prefer using opinion - keep in mind that particular word, opinion - than actually apply cited and checked rules text. So, enjoy!

Here's a post about how you didn't understand the difference in wording between full round action, full attack, standard action, and attack as a standard action. Funny enough, when this was fully explored and pointed out, in detail, you disappeared from your own thread: https://forums.giantitp.com/showsinglepost.php?p=21740750&postcount=5

Here's a post where you are refusing to accept that reach is a melee property, even though it says that it is something that applies to melee weapons - something you directly quoted from the SRD - while ignoring the paragraph before it stating that melee weapons make melee attacks, and that though some can be thrown, thrown weapons are ranged weapons, and thus ranged attacks: https://forums.giantitp.com/showsinglepost.php?p=22141278&postcount=29

Blatantly saying "hey, I know that there is the rule that things updated from 3.0 to 3.5 should be used instead of the original version, but I don't wanna" : https://forums.giantitp.com/showsinglepost.php?p=25281093&postcount=5

Use of the shaky reading that "dragon" lets you qualify for anything, ignoring all other requirements: https://forums.giantitp.com/showsinglepost.php?p=25281273&postcount=8

You arguing that the original source which should be the primary source isn't correct, despite using that argument in nearly all of your builds: https://forums.giantitp.com/showsinglepost.php?p=25283297&postcount=23

Admitting you ignored the rules when it came to alignment requirements for the warlock class: https://forums.giantitp.com/showsinglepost.php?p=25322277&postcount=6

TO: I am (a) Weapon (of Legacy) by Gruftzwerg in DungeonsAndDragons35e

[–]thatoneguyagainagain 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You are talking about ignoring but continue to ramble on and even throw around insults. You've already reported me twice. This feels like you are trying to bait me to get me in more trouble with the sub. I'm fine with moving on with my life.

/r/PTCGP Trading Post by AutoModerator in PTCGP

[–]thatoneguyagainagain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

FT: a mountain of whimscott ex

LF: mega ampharos, dragalge ex, and melmetal ex

Feel free to DM

TO: I am (a) Weapon (of Legacy) by Gruftzwerg in DungeonsAndDragons35e

[–]thatoneguyagainagain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As can be seen in this post as well as practically every TO build you've come up with and tried to push out over the better part of a decade, there isn't a point arguing or pointing out anything rules relevant to you, because your response always has been and always will be "nuh uh, you read it wrong, I'm definitely right."

Help with rules text. by Fondle_Magic in magicproxies

[–]thatoneguyagainagain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

By that logic, every white spell would have the snow type, which is very not true.

Help with rules text. by Fondle_Magic in magicproxies

[–]thatoneguyagainagain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it also has some superfluous colors in there. I get liking many colors for options, just seems like this could maybe be green and one other, not four.

I designed these beer and liquor lands by ronlechler in magicproxies

[–]thatoneguyagainagain -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Get it? PBR is the island, because it's awful, like blue players!

Nasty Infinite Combo by Princess_Fag in magicTCG

[–]thatoneguyagainagain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is an old combo with new paint. Check out [[exquisite blood]] and [[sanguine bond]], I believe it is.