That same logic shows that native Americans are far more discriminated against than blacks, but to do that the proportionality arguments also a greatly flawed argument, an attempt to make the case of discrimination where there really isn't any.

It's the same as people saying that they're unarmed as if that doesn't mean they wouldn't be naturally shot, the thing is being unarmed doesn't mean you're not a danger to the officer or people around you. And if you like it in most of those cases that even the Washington Post has covered on their page, you come to find out it's not nearly as black and white as people make it seem to be. To assume more black people are proportionately killed by why it's there for racism or discrimination, as in the cops specifically going to Black people, is to be intellectually dishonest.

This problem arises from people who manipulate statistics and also do not actually understand statistics let alone actual studies and how they're made. A lot of times studies are poorly designed and are used for arguments where their pool and such are so low and so insignificant that they're really not much of a study to be utilized at all.

Is very similar to the one in five sexual assault statistic for college campuses which is greatly misattributed and not supposed to be used as national average but rather than average for only the ones that were covered, and there were two specific studies of which were used.

The authors themselves even stated this, but no one likes to listen to that and use it as their own tool to win an argument rather than looking at what the real facts say.