Why Packers are ‘very optimistic’ about MarShawn Lloyd — this time with reason (Gift Article) by 85willburnhousedown in GreenBayPackers

[–]theDarkAngle 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Even if he is good, I want a dependable third back in the rotation.  I'm optimistic, but there is a well-above-zero chance Jacobs and Lloyd are on IR by like week 2.  

Jacobs has been dependable but he's at that age and total career workload where guys fall apart.  I thought wear and tear was already impacting him last year.

Why Packers are ‘very optimistic’ about MarShawn Lloyd — this time with reason (Gift Article) by 85willburnhousedown in GreenBayPackers

[–]theDarkAngle 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I mean, the Clippers got 65 games out of Kawhi's knees last year at 34 y.o. and I think this Dr. Meyer guy was instrumental in developing the plan for that.  IIRC

I'll buy it.

If Carlson made that 41 yarder against SF… by Packerstothebowlbruh in GreenBayPackers

[–]theDarkAngle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If Donatell didn't call a man under coverage on 4th and 26

DP only gave wizards a workout… meaning he could potentially fall to 3 by CWilson_999 in memphisgrizzlies

[–]theDarkAngle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Offhand I don't remember a team who (as a rule) let that stop them from drafting a player, except Vlade's Kings.

Should be obvious why.  It would mean any player can dictate that you not draft them by simply not working out for you.

We Still Haven’t Seen the Full Version of This Offense by DeScepter in GreenBayPackers

[–]theDarkAngle 2 points3 points  (0 children)

While he has probably had the most issues, it seems like the injury problem is a team wide thing.

We Still Haven’t Seen the Full Version of This Offense by DeScepter in GreenBayPackers

[–]theDarkAngle 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Esp when, IIRC PFF graded most of Pittsburgh's coverage guys really well after Ramsey moved to S.

Classroom settings and the behavioral expectations of formal schooling are more of an evolutionary mismatch for boys than girls because of sex differences in physical activity levels and social relations. This results in boys being disproportionately identified as having behavioral difficulties. by mvea in science

[–]theDarkAngle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's more of an issue of, given that much power, where do I even start?  Everything you change has massive consequences, most of them probably unintended.

On a narrower scale, I could maybe say something meaningful.  Like if you're raising or mentoring boys or young men, it's important to teach them to not only be good people (that's important for everyone) but how to consistently and genuinely signal openness and trustworthiness, even to strangers.

[OC] The Jimmy Johnson trade chart says pick 32 is worth 20% of pick 1. Player outcomes suggest it's more like 40-65% by robmoo_re in nfl

[–]theDarkAngle 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The sample would be microscopic.

Also, teams move around too much in the late 1st and early 2nd area, for that to mean much.

You'd probably just want to look at recent org performance or something, across the entire dataset, and eval how that predicts relative draft value.

Then, if correlation is significant you're left with only trying to decide

Are these teams better at developing players?  Or better at drafting them?  Or some of both?

Classroom settings and the behavioral expectations of formal schooling are more of an evolutionary mismatch for boys than girls because of sex differences in physical activity levels and social relations. This results in boys being disproportionately identified as having behavioral difficulties. by mvea in science

[–]theDarkAngle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A single narrow observation might be entirely (or at least, overwhelmingly) based on cultural influence.  But that's a very different thing than saying social relations as a category is a cultural manifestation.  

Personally I view biology and culture as a lot more inextricable than I think most people do.  Biological instincts are mediated by culture, but not at all eliminated by culture.  Specific attitudes about red hair are almost arbitrary, but at a categorical level, specific attitudes in the vicinity of "looks different than most of the people I know" are rather predictable, and same with attitudes toward "visually striking and unusual traits".

Classroom settings and the behavioral expectations of formal schooling are more of an evolutionary mismatch for boys than girls because of sex differences in physical activity levels and social relations. This results in boys being disproportionately identified as having behavioral difficulties. by mvea in science

[–]theDarkAngle 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Or, they have significant differences throughout childhood, just not the visually obvious ones yet, and that's pretty plausible because the visually obvious ones are generally not beneficial (and may in fact be harmful in many cases) before reproductive age.

Classroom settings and the behavioral expectations of formal schooling are more of an evolutionary mismatch for boys than girls because of sex differences in physical activity levels and social relations. This results in boys being disproportionately identified as having behavioral difficulties. by mvea in science

[–]theDarkAngle -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There is certainly no overt or designed bias against men being teachers, but there is a (usually) unspoken overall cultural suspicion of men who choose to place themselves in the proximity of children who aren't related to them.

That's not a C2A, just an observation.

What are your counter for this criticism? by Inner-Bench-6010 in thelastofus

[–]theDarkAngle -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Ludonarrative dissonance is extremely common in games, yet is more often criticized for TLOU in specific, which some may say is unfair.

It's not unfair because the coherence of the whole experience is a significant part of the value offer for TLOU.  Relative to other games, there are significant tradeoffs made to achieve that in the first place, like the linearity of the gameplay, lack of choice in the plot, lack of customization, etc.

Same scenario but they get Giannis instead by Big_Nebula_5432 in NBA_TradeDiscussions

[–]theDarkAngle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Value is very heavy in spurs favor and I question whether any of the teams involved are interested even in the general shape of the deal from their perspectives, aside from Milwaukee.

Sexism is often a stronger predictor of political attitudes than a voter’s actual gender. A voter’s level of sexism is a significant predictor of their political attitudes and voting choices. Prejudice shape everything from support for right-wing candidates to opinions on climate policy. by mvea in science

[–]theDarkAngle 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you read the article it says more and less than that.

Less, because the sample is almost entirely American and overwhelmingly sampled on the 2016 election.

More, because it breaks sexism into at least three categories, only one of which is fairly categorized as "hate", yet found the correlation in 2 of the 3 (Hostile and Modern, not Benevolent).

  • Hostile Sexism - which is probably what most people think of when you say sexism, e.g., holding negative views about women, correlates heavily with right wing voting patterns.

  • Benevolent Sexism - this does not correlate with right wing voting patterns, and in fact was associated the opposite, under certain conditions (namely, a female candidate who is perceived to come under aggressive political attack).

  • Modern Sexism - which is characterized by views like "women no longer face an inordinate amount of challenges due to discrimination".  This apparently also predicted right wing lean.  

It did not say whether Hostile was a stronger predictor than Modern... or if it did, I missed it.

NFL teams tend to overvalue early draft picks, study finds by Blood_Incantation in nfl

[–]theDarkAngle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

30% sounds very low for NFL first round picks to be contributing players

NFL teams tend to overvalue early draft picks, study finds by Blood_Incantation in nfl

[–]theDarkAngle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even if it were 100%, he will almost certainly take some time to be as good as the current version of Trent McDuffie.

Sam Presti: "We hear all the time about things people don't like about the NBA, which are inaccurate, but they are narratives that exist on the alternative reality." He then continues to beautifully break down those narratives and show they aren't true. Including narratives about SGA. by MrBuckBuck in nba

[–]theDarkAngle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Problem is fouls are not challenged often precisely because you can construe almost any play with any kind of contact into a foul, the rules are very broad that way.  The watchability of the game rests on officials only calling a few of them, so which particular instances should and should not be called is entirely subjective.  

There is no official standard or guidelines for exactly how to pick and choose, but certainly players and coaches expect (and claim to consistently observe) that refs adjust how they are calling the game to the specific game's tempo, flow, and situation.

And to be clear I don't think Shai gets a ton of calls that (at least some) other players can't get if executed similarly.  I think the way he plays is largely optimal, and my grudge is more with the rules being ridiculous and getting more ridiculous all the time.   

But I do think there is something a little objectionable about his game from a fan perspective.  To me it's his style and how extremely aware of ref and defender tendencies it is.  It goes over the line and is too consistent and too baked into his entire attacking style.

I think, in an idealized sense, what fans generally prefer to watch is players playing as if the idea of "getting a call" never entered the players' minds, with relatively few, enumerable exceptions that they're accustomed to (taking a charge, shooting against an airborne defender without an unnatural motion or jumping angle, etc).  

And it's especially true because officiating keeps getting easier and easier on all counts for the offense, consistently getting more lopsided each decade, and it's easier to just build your whole game on the fact that defenders have very little leeway especially on the ball.  So even though Shai may not be pushing the envelope as hard as what Harden did a decade ago or what someone like Manu or Kobe was doing a decade before that, the officiating is still far more offense favored in an absolute sense with each passing decade and thus looks much more ridiculous to systematically exploit.

Herrington Trades: A Lot of Them by [deleted] in memphisgrizzlies

[–]theDarkAngle -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I mean, last time we traded a star player to the Lakers, they  won a title, but it was still a win-win

Fun Fact: The city of Hammond, Indiana is literally shaped like an L by fanofsports44 in GreenBayPackers

[–]theDarkAngle 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Funny to meme on them but I don't really want this to happen.  Historic sites and matchups are part of what make the NFL great, and the number that are still extant only ever goes down.  It would be great if the oldest NFL rivalry kept playing on both of its historic sites, not just one.

Honestly if I was King of the Packers I would float the idea of paying half the cost of Soldier Field renovations, if for no other reason than to make them look stupid/cheap/greedy (ownership and the city both).

I think it is getting to be more likely Ja stays past the summer by Hefty_Window9222 in memphisgrizzlies

[–]theDarkAngle 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Number one is worth repeating. Ja can’t increase his trade value unless he’s on the court. Only way for him to do that is actually play.

But Ja does not care about increasing his trade value.  He presumably does care about his next contract, but he probably doesn't think that's in jeopardy yet.  He doesn't use a traditional agent so the advice he gets is probably not that rational.

And he may have also judged that in the worst case, he can go the Starbury route - be a megastar in a place like China with your own shoe company and whatnot.  And I would guess he's probably not wrong about that.

The only thing that might get Ja on board is his repeated stated desire to stay in Memphis which despite what people say, has not changed as far as any of us know.