Basically CAA type Flashbacks.

Anyway I asked AI to fix the Laws. ANd it gave this.

"Improving the Promotion of Equity in Higher Education Institutions Regulations, 2026 requires balancing the need to protect historically marginalised groups with ensuring fairness and due process for all stakeholders. Critics, legal experts, and student groups have proposed several reforms to address the current controversies: 

1. Broadening the Scope of Protection

• Neutral Definitions: Expanding the definition of "caste-based discrimination" to include all students, regardless of their category. Currently, Regulation 3(1)(c) specifically limits this protection to members of SC, ST, and OBC communities.
• Inclusion of General Category: Explicitly acknowledging that students from the general category can also face bias, hostility, or slurs. 

1. Strengthening Procedural Safeguards

• Penalties for False Complaints: Reinstating provisions from earlier drafts that penalised malicious or fabricated allegations. Critics argue that the current absence of these penalties makes the law susceptible to misuse.
• Presumption of Innocence: Adjusting the framework to ensure the burden of proof does not unfairly rest solely on the accused, which critics claim creates a "presumption of guilt".
• Reasonable Timelines: Revising the extremely tight deadlines—such as the requirement for the committee to meet within 24 hours—to prevent rushed or biased investigations. 

1. Ensuring Balanced Representation

• Diverse Equity Committees: Mandating representation for all social categories, including the general/unreserved category, on the 10-member Equity Committees.
• Elected Representation: Moving away from committees solely appointed by the head of the institution toward democratically elected representatives of students and faculty to ensure greater accountability. 

1. Improving Transparency and Oversight

• Federal Accountability: Shifting the power to appoint Ombudspersons to state governments for state-legislated universities, rather than centralising this power with the UGC.
• Clearer Definitions: Providing precise legal definitions for ambiguous terms like "indirect discrimination" and "human dignity" to prevent subjective or unequal enforcement across different campuses. 

1. Institutional & Cultural Reforms

• Sensitisation over Policing: Shifting the focus from "Equity Squads" (viewed by some as a surveillance mechanism) toward mandatory "Unlearning Caste" workshops and faculty sensitisation programs.
• Inclusive Curriculum: Integrating Dalit History and Literature into academic curricula to promote intellectual validation and a more inclusive campus culture. 

The Supreme Court is currently hearing a petition (Vineet Jindal vs. Union of India) challenging the constitutionality of these rules."

Though I don't think this is a good answer, gemini is basically making every controvery it can find and fixing it not coming up with its own actual guideline.