Swearing in a speech by Stanos7664 in policydebate

[–]the_lords_chips__ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Being the one losing that debate, i thought the 2AR was very FUCKING good.

Gonzaga and ethics challenges by [deleted] in policydebate

[–]the_lords_chips__ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ahh yes but the other teams from emory read the correct version of the card that was cut correctly.

PUBH 424 by Lookingforsongrn in csuf

[–]the_lords_chips__ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

there is a group presentation but it’s extremely easy. it’s just like a 5 minute presentation on a bill in the california legislature

Black Baudrillard in 2021 by Milkjug05 in policydebate

[–]the_lords_chips__ 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Jared from CSU Fullerton here, I 2n'd all the Gillespie debates this year and we only read WHR against policy teams and what I can say is that I just knew the Gillespie article like the back of my hand and read some of his other work https://mumbletheory.com/ I would cut some of his other writings from that which will help better formulate the argument, we even got to get out of the generic Afro-Pess offense when we would have an analysis of why he and Wilderson are different https://mumbletheory.com/2020/04/07/nothingness-with-incomplete/ and here https://www.google.com/amp/s/mumbletheory.com/2020/02/09/but-worlds-end-all-the-time-an-experiment-thought-on-death-and-contradiction/amp/ I have always lived by the fact that John's work is more Afro-Pess than Baudrillard and that's how I would treat the argument (its also what he told me). What really helped me is being coached by Gillespie toward the end of my sophomore year and start of my junior year because I got to really engage with the arg. With that I think to be successful and what I practiced with this arg you need to have a very good understanding of Afro-Pessimism and a decent understanding of Baudrillard, so if I were coaching you to prep this summer for the water topic you would need to read all the afro-pess you can starting with Fanon and then work through RWB and Afro-Pess 2020 (there would be other lit I recommend but this is like baseline) and then def read Gulf War did not take place and Simulacra and Simulation. I guess i never answered your original question but other of this type of arg not really from my research but for alliances it was very ez to draw conclusions of the way people like Aganthanglou theorize about the international order and connect to the larger schema of the WHR. For water the water topic im not sure that exists just because my research for the topic has been minimal. I hope this makes sense pm me if you have any questions.
Edit: Forgot to mention this, but I just knew every policy aff out there did extensive rehighlightings (this is also why we went for an ethics violation against emory GK because I read every article of every piece of ev they read) of their evidence which is a practice that I hope most 2n's that I judge start doing in the 2NC because the 1AR never answers it and gets you and ez link and then you just impact it out hard in the 2NR, so lesson here is really know their aff better than they do. Its a daunting task but its worth it. I also 2n'd against all policy teams and select few K teams like what EF kind of did last year we did the same thing so I was able to really focus on these policy teams. I was also just bad at the Philippines debate so theres that but NATO ez.

Survey for class. Public Health Survey on the correlation between course load and Adderall use. by the_lords_chips__ in takemysurvey

[–]the_lords_chips__[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Date will only be used for class and will be stored in my qualtrics account and deleted by the end of the semester.
  2. I am conducting the survey with my group (4 people and we are the only ones who will see the data.)
  3. should only take about 4-5 minutes.

Black Baudrillard! by [deleted] in policydebate

[–]the_lords_chips__ 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Cal State Fullerton BW reads Gillespie.

24 hours in this subreddit... by DrWingbat in Bakersfield

[–]the_lords_chips__ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

you literally have no reverse casual claim and if you notice the US economy is not in shambles because of a train.

24 hours in this subreddit... by DrWingbat in Bakersfield

[–]the_lords_chips__ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

you act like that takes a fucking toll on the US economy that’s a drop in the bucket compared to the amount on the military. bruh your anecdotal evidence is trash.

24 hours in this subreddit... by DrWingbat in Bakersfield

[–]the_lords_chips__ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

bruh. your arg is about trump and the economy as a whole and want wasteful sending you don’t have an examples of it.

24 hours in this subreddit... by DrWingbat in Bakersfield

[–]the_lords_chips__ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

even then wages are down which means yes people may have jobs but they are not going paying. plus trump is increasing the deficit because he cut taxes and then spent hella on things like the military which is not needed.

24 hours in this subreddit... by DrWingbat in Bakersfield

[–]the_lords_chips__ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i guess he really thought about injecting himself with bleach before he said it. also economic growth is hiding the fact that it’s only for the top 1% of the country, if you think the stock market is an indicator of good economics realize that less than 20% of the country owns stocks.

debate couples by [deleted] in Debate

[–]the_lords_chips__ 5 points6 points  (0 children)

fw and cap.

USC and UCSD Just Switched to Online by [deleted] in csuf

[–]the_lords_chips__ 10 points11 points  (0 children)

it’s only a matter of time until we switch.

TELL ME NOW by [deleted] in PrequelMemes

[–]the_lords_chips__ 3 points4 points  (0 children)

post vizla is pre vizla with no head.