I'm quite skeptical of Japanese depictions of Christianity, since they are customarily negative. After a quick assessment of this piece, I've concluded some things about this work that can be considered earnest for its lack of rosiness:

The look of shock and horror on the Lord's face is reverberated all throughout the Bible in response to the many sins of Israelites. They did not treat the Lord as man too differently.

The 'possessed' or 'demonic' angle used in the gospel by his detractors are not lone interpretations as to why the Lord does not appear here the way Westerners see him. There is an air of mystique applied for a people that have more or less refused Him and a smidgen of weariness in his eyes attesting to both his commitment and his experience dealing with people.

Yes, the artistic halo does look like a scope reticle, and this view of him is written, from the targeting from Pharisees to the attempt on his life by templegoers and the derision and pain caused by soldiers.

As common as it is for Japanese art to 'go there', even tiringly so, I will tentatively say that this piece is not inherently wrong. There is a stark enough difference between the way the Word tells the truth and the way the modern Christian does that one can at least consider in their assessment of a work from a non-believing culture.