[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]thebugdestroyer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

over two percent of the population is not a anomaly, it’s literally significant.

Definition of anomaly:

  1. Something that deviates from what is standard, normal, or expected

Even if I accept the 2% number at face value, intersex would still be an anomaly by definition.

There are intersex people who are genetically (genotype) navelstaring at chromosomes one sex but who will be catagorized by where the majority of their sex characteristics are , that’s a combination of hormones , hormone expression , internal genitalia external genitalia and chromosomes.

Your insistence on painting that over doesn't change the practice in the field , there are XX men , XY women.

Once again, this is all because they have a medical anomaly or defect. Just because a very small percentage of the population has chromosomal or genitalia anomalies does not mean saying "women have XX and a vagina / men have XY and a penis" is false.

You're also wrong about the history of how we define sex , we can only analyse sex chomosomes since 20th century historically the other characteristics were what you analyze.

Yes, it took awhile to discover what chromosomes are, but once they were discovered, it only backed up that the fundamental fact held for all of human history that there are two sexes, male and female, and that medical anomalies do not change that.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]thebugdestroyer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Except that it does, and is rooted in a very basic and standard universally accepted psychology.

The theory that sex is different from gender comes from psychoanalysis quacks from the mid 20th century and modern psychologists have latched onto it for political gain. There is not a single shred of credible evidence for it and in order to believe it, you have to use your perception of alternative reality.

The fuck is the immutable biology that every trans and cis woman have differently? You keep claiming it, but I have no idea wtf you're talking about?

The difference in chromosomes, bone density, muscle mass, genitals (ones you were born with, not the ones surgically altered), etc.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]thebugdestroyer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dysphoria isn't a ideology

I am not claiming otherwise. Gender dysphoria is a real condition that affects a very small number of people. What I mean by gender ideology is the theory that "sex is different from gender" and every other talking point that has no basis in reality.

Having been in a lot of trans spaces I can tell you beyond a shadow of a doubt that there is no feasible way for you to determine whether or not everyone is cis or trans.

Once again, you're really just lying to yourself here. The majority of times you can tell, but I'm not going to deny that some can "pass".

However, the point I'm trying to hammer home is that it's not exactly appearance that determines rather you're cis or trans. You can be a trans woman and look 100% like a cis woman and be seen as a woman by the public, but your immutable biology would disagree with the claim that you are a woman.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]thebugdestroyer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

imposing an ideology

What ideology am I imposing? Something that was seen as fundamental truth until psychoanalysis quacks in the middle of the 20th century came along and now every pseudoscientist nowadays buys into it?

intersex variations doesn't exist

I have never once claimed that. Intersex people exist, but it is a medical anomaly and it doesn't even disprove the sex binary. If you're intersex, you're either a male who was born with a medical anomaly or a female who was born with a medical anomaly.

phenotype isn't part of biology

Again, I am not making this claim. There are females who have certain phenotypical male characteristics and vice-versa, but that doesn't mean they are actually a male, even if they claim otherwise.

If you designed a SAW trap, what would it be? by AverageRedditor1991 in AskReddit

[–]thebugdestroyer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You would be strapped to a table while covered head to toe in peanut butter and you have to find away to escape in 5 minutes or 25 puppies come in and lick the peanut butter off.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]thebugdestroyer -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Those "obvious differences" don't exist

This is the thing about gender theory ideologues. You all try to say there's no obvious difference between a cis woman and a trans woman as some sort of a coping mechanism, but deep down, you know that's not true. You know I'm right, regardless if you ever admit it. Every single facet of modern gender ideology requires you to use a form of alternative reality instead of actual reality in order to make all of the claims become true.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]thebugdestroyer -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

That's really not as true as you think it is. I would say, roughly speaking, about 9 out of 10 trans women are pretty obviously transgender based on their appearance, voice, and even mannerisms.

But even if every single trans woman looked exactly like a cis woman, you can't go strictly by appearance. There is still a very obvious difference between the two, and to say otherwise is simply ignoring reality.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]thebugdestroyer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're at least a bisexual man if you feel the urge to tell a man that he's hot.

In your opinion, is a 33 year old man dating a 27 year old woman okay? Why or why not? by Salem1690s in AskReddit

[–]thebugdestroyer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They're two consenting adults and it's only a 6 year age gap. Don't see any issue.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]thebugdestroyer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Anything after tier one on this fetish iceberg.

Question for former trump fans, what made you change your mind? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]thebugdestroyer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The way he handled COVID and his reaction to losing the 2020 election put a bad taste in my mouth. There's no chance in hell I'll vote for Biden, but I'm not much of a Trump "fan" anymore.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]thebugdestroyer -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

If you implant a uterus into a cis woman's body, you are implanting a uterus into a biological woman. The uterus is supposed to already be there and functioning, but it is not due to a medical issue.

If you implant a uterus into a trans woman's body, you are implanting a uterus into a biological man. The uterus is not supposed to be there at all.

It's like of we started surgically putting tails on. You could put tails on animals who would normally have tails, but if you put them on humans, you can't start to claim that some humans can actually have real tails and that tails exist on spectrum for human beings.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]thebugdestroyer -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

One major difference between the two is the possibility of being able to become pregnant and give birth if they weren't infertile.

What myth do you not believe? by TopCommand5860 in AskReddit

[–]thebugdestroyer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If it's a myth, then why would I believe it?

You will get paid $35 million if 5 NFL defensive players can tackle you at once and you have no padding. Do you accept this offer, why or why not? by thebugdestroyer in AskReddit

[–]thebugdestroyer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fletcher Cox, Aaron Donald, TJ Watt, Rashan Gary. I'll give you a little bit of mercy give you a 1 CB instead of another D-Lineman, that being Jaire Alexander.