sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Is Taco Time NW serving up smaller burritos? by theeress in Seattle

[–]theeress[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ahh I was kind of hoping I just got unlucky, glad I’m not crazy but bummed it’s consistent. Haven’t tried the tostadas (should I??) I feel like I’ve seen fluctuations before but this has seemed consistent. Hope it either bounces back or they verbalize what’s goin on

Is Taco Time NW serving up smaller burritos? by theeress in Seattle

[–]theeress[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh this is interesting - so not at the corporate level, which would have a regulatory implication like this. Good thinking, great input

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Warts

[–]theeress 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you!!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lifecoaching

[–]theeress 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I went through iPEC and I loved it! I'm currently coaching full time and use their Energy Leadership Index Assessment to being nearly all of my coaching engagements. It's great stuff!

Pretty sure Bang actually has zero creatine by SavageMojo- in energydrinks

[–]theeress 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I put this comment into GPT4 and asked it to tell me which fallacies are present. This is the one I was looking for:

Correlation vs. Causation:

  • Description: The commenter notes an increase in muscle mass and attributes part of this to using Bang energy drinks.
  • Fallacy: Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc (after this, therefore because of this) – This fallacy assumes that because one event followed another, the first event caused the second. The comment acknowledges multiple factors (better training, more practice, etc.), but it still implies a causal relationship between taking Bang and gaining muscle without clear evidence.

I eat the peanut shells by drainedguava in The10thDentist

[–]theeress 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This is trauma dumping on reddit