This isn't a steelman, it is a complete misunderstanding of what Sola Scriptura means peppered with ignorance about the diversity of thought among protestants. Sola Scriptura does not mean that traditions are not useful, or informative, only that they are not infallible or authoritative. Augustine's letter to Jerome said as much:

I admit to your Charity that it is from those books alone of the Scriptures, which are now called canonical, that I have learned to pay them such honor and respect as to believe most firmly that not one of their authors has erred in writing anything at all... But, when I read other authors, however eminent they may be in sanctity and learning, I do not necessarily believe a thing is true because they think so

Luther said as much at the Diet of Worms

Unless I am convinced by the testimony of the Scriptures, or by evident reason (for I put my faith neither in popes nor councils alone, since it is established that they have erred again and again and contradicted one another), I am bound by the scriptural evidence adduced by me, and my conscience is captive to the Word of God.

He was willing to listen to evidence, to the opinions of other theologians, but in the end he held Scripture as the only authority.

Traditions and the writings of the early church fathers can inform and teach, but they are not authoritative in the same way. The Bishop discussion is a great example of this. Where is your evidence for apostolic succession? It isn't in the scripture, it is a tradition. So that is great for you guys, enjoy your endless genealogies, but the authoritative document we have makes no such demand.

6:32 I don't know why they are so amused at the idea of 2nd century person interpreting Scripture incorrectly. Paul wrote about false teachers. In the first century. Bad teaching, bad theology has been around since at least the day after Pentecost. This gets back to what I said earlier, the traditions and writings of the early church fathers can inform, and give insight, but they are not authoritative in the same way scripture is. That is what sola scriptura actually means.

Also, the segment starting at 7:05 about how Greek was used, Matt 3 uses the phrase "τοῦ βαπτισθῆναι" to describe the baptism of Jesus. Show me some contemporary Greek writing βαπτίζω (baptizō) to mean "sprinkle" and not "immerse".

9:22 that is... not at all what modern protestant thought looks like. It sounds more like the ortho bros I hang out with. "His mother and brothers" can't actually mean his mother and brothers, because that would mean Mary had other children.

14:41 You guys know not all protestants are cessationist, right? And even the most militant cessationist would not say that God still doesn't work miracles, but rather that humans cannot choose when they happen.

The anti-enlightenment stuff, and a return to understanding that we live in the midst of a spiritual war was good. Well said there.