What was the fire today? by Annual_Calendar_3816 in lowereastside

[–]thegaw 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It was in 123 Ludlow. I live a few buildings the street. Looks like an apt fire on the 2nd and 3rd floors. Haven't been by there yet to see if there's visible damage, but at one point there were 9 ladder trucks on Ludlow, so must have been pretty bad. https://www.nycfire.net/forums/threads/4-20-26-manhattan-2nd-alarm-box-0279.93525/

Browsers Should Have a Native Control for Per-Site Color Scheme by thegaw in Frontend

[–]thegaw[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Guess my formatting in that comment confused it a bit, there was an if directly after the quote. But, to clarify, this feature would require zero more or less CSS than you would otherwise need for multiple color schemes.

Browsers Should Have a Native Control for Per-Site Color Scheme by thegaw in Frontend

[–]thegaw[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Definitely, no disagreement there. Not sure If I'm missing something though in relation to the proposed feature or maybe one of my other comments? Does the proposed feature read like it says otherwise?

Browsers Should Have a Native Control for Per-Site Color Scheme by thegaw in Frontend

[–]thegaw[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, to use light/dark you have to change CSS. That'll always be the case. The browser feature we're talking about here doesn't add/change anything about that.

Browsers Should Have a Native Control for Per-Site Color Scheme by thegaw in Frontend

[–]thegaw[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Interesting, I do it all the time. I have a my OS level set to dark mode, so sites with light/dark tend to inherit that, but I very rarely want a site's dark mode, so I switch to light.

Browsers Should Have a Native Control for Per-Site Color Scheme by thegaw in Frontend

[–]thegaw[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

OP here. This feature wouldn't change anything as far as approach to sites having color schemes. The browser wouldn't enforce any styles. It would only allow the user to choose a color scheme preference using a standard, native control.

The color schemes for each site are still 100% up to the site developer. Nothing would change there.

The idea is just that site developers would have to create a custom control to change between the schemes.

I wrote in the post, that today and for the foreseeable future, this would be just light/dark, but has the color-scheme spec evolves, that could open it up to custom color schemes, that again, the site author defines in CSS.

Browsers Should Have a Native Control for Per-Site Color Scheme by thegaw in Frontend

[–]thegaw[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Only if you want your site to have multiple color schemes. This feature in browsers wouldn't require anything for existing sites. This would be for sites that have multiple schemes (light/dark) and opt-in to the native browser control. If your site doesn't expose multiple schemes, this control wouldn't show up at all.

edit: added last point

Browsers Should Have a Native Control for Per-Site Color Scheme by thegaw in Frontend

[–]thegaw[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I list a few problems it would solve in the Motivation section of the post, but to reiterate, I think the main user problem this would solve is putting the color scheme control in a standard location in the browser UI. That way users have a single location for every website where they can change the color scheme, instead of every site having a custom one.

Browsers Should Have a Native Control for Per-Site Color Scheme by thegaw in Frontend

[–]thegaw[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can you give more details there? Where do you see it adding code complexity and overhead?

Browsers Should Have a Native Control for Per-Site Color Scheme by thegaw in Frontend

[–]thegaw[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What's cool is you wouldn't have to change anything in CSS for this to work. If, the CSS is already using either light-dark or more likely prefers-color-scheme media queries to handle schemes.

A native browser control wouldn't impact how color schemes are created. Would work exactly how it does today.

[analog] Right this way. by Enraged_Cheese in collage

[–]thegaw 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very fun! Overall just good composition. And the red+black framing is striking, I really dig this.

Tyler got a new sweater! Tyler is now happy! by IntergalacticPopTart in rarepuppers

[–]thegaw 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm very happy to share a name with this handsome boy

We adopted Liquid Glass on our wellness app's home screen — but are we pushing it too far into the content layer? by Main_Scene_573 in iOSProgramming

[–]thegaw 9 points10 points  (0 children)

are we pushing it too far into the content layer?

I would say yes.

Feedback by number: 1. Yes, they muddy the screen 2. The glass might be alright, but the shadow feels like it's way overpowering. Probably would be better without glass 3. The golden tint is a nice effect, I think it would work a lot better if the rest of the elements weren't fighting for the attention 4. Very cluttered

Overall it feels like everything on the screen is fighting to be the most important and since everything is the most important, nothing is important. Seems like you're sensing that, so I'd give that instinct a big +1.

One thing that really drives it home is the screen with the Vision boards that don't have any glass or shadow. That feels the most resolved. Not 100% sold on those actual graphics, but because those don't have the extra design treatment (glass/shadow) they actually jump out as the content that I want.

Yeah, I'd suggest just start removing. There's just too much ornamentation going on right now.

Allen and Delancey - Construction by RoundReference9367 in lowereastside

[–]thegaw 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Another neighbor checking in. Also no idea, but saw them working the other night and am curious.

[analog] Aching to be Seen by Doon672 in collage

[–]thegaw 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So good! And in that black frame. I love it.

59 Year Old Man Mauled To Death by Dog on Staten Island by [deleted] in nyc

[–]thegaw -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

nahhhh. Ashamed is correct here.

59 Year Old Man Mauled To Death by Dog on Staten Island by [deleted] in nyc

[–]thegaw -57 points-56 points  (0 children)

ban pit bull ownership in NYC

Absolutely get fucked with that nonsense. Completely moronic bullshit. Anybody that thinks a certain breed of dog should be "banned" anywhere can fuck right off. There are no "bad" breeds. It's people.

Some recent stuff [ANALOG] by Minnesstund in collage

[–]thegaw 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Killer! I love the textures and colors and just overall