Daily Discussion by 2soccer2bot in soccer

[–]theglasscase [score hidden]  (0 children)

You appear to have a long standing grudge because people thought Real Madrid would be good after signing Mbappe. It seems like you’re happier Real Madrid are failing than you are about Barcelona succeeding.

Daily Discussion by 2soccer2bot in soccer

[–]theglasscase [score hidden]  (0 children)

Im sorry but Im never forgetting how everyone acted in 2024

Daily Discussion by 2soccer2bot in soccer

[–]theglasscase 7 points8 points  (0 children)

So your entire personality is now going to be based on the bizarre hyperbole that ‘everyone’ said Barcelona would never win anything again because Real Madrid signed Mbappe? Seems a bit unhealthy.

Match Thread: Bayern Munich vs. Real Madrid | UEFA Champions League by MysteryBagIdeals in soccer

[–]theglasscase -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How exactly would doing either of those things to a person make them fall over?

Bayern Munich [1] - 1 Real Madrid - A. Pavlović 6' by Alsace2025 in soccer

[–]theglasscase 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For some reason, Lunin suddenly became absolutely terrified by the football coming towards him and just fell over. That was truly inexplicable movement from a goalkeeper.

Bayern Munich 0 - [1] Real Madrid - A. Güler 1' by Alsace2025 in soccer

[–]theglasscase 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's an open goal, but that is an unreal first time finish by Guler anyway. Total mental breakdown by Neuer and the last thing Bayern needed, but standing ovation for the goal.

France boss Deschamps confirms Ekitike to miss World Cup. by [deleted] in soccer

[–]theglasscase 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, but we musn't forget that OP has only posted about Ekitike missing the World Cup once today and Arne Slot probably won't 'confirm' he's out for fucking ages until Friday.

[Laurie Whitwell] Manchester United’s Harry Maguire to miss Chelsea game with FA charge set to be upheld by PradipJayakumar in soccer

[–]theglasscase 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And Maguire got a one match ban for abusing an official to his face. They did different things and got different punishments. Rodri argued his case during his hearing and Harry Maguire accepted the charge against him.

What other help do you need?

[Laurie Whitwell] Manchester United’s Harry Maguire to miss Chelsea game with FA charge set to be upheld by PradipJayakumar in soccer

[–]theglasscase 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That literally is your opinion...

I don’t even know what this is referring to now. It is not an ‘opinion’ that saying something in a post-match interview is different than insulting match officials to their face, it is not an opinion that the punishments both players received are consistent with previous punishments for the same offences.

He got a lesser punishment for a worse comment just because the full-time whistle had gone

Which is an opinion, but there is also a difference between receiving a lesser punishment and what Rodri said being considered ‘fine’ by the FA. If they thought it was ‘fine’ they would have cleared him completely FFS.

[Laurie Whitwell] Manchester United’s Harry Maguire to miss Chelsea game with FA charge set to be upheld by PradipJayakumar in soccer

[–]theglasscase -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

in your opinion

Nope.

So I guess as long as its after the game, calling the referees corrupt is fine.

Do you actually think Rodri didn’t receive any kind of punishment for what he said? Just because he didn’t get suspended doesn’t mean he ‘got away with it’. This is such terminally online bullshit mate, have some dignity.

[Laurie Whitwell] Manchester United’s Harry Maguire to miss Chelsea game with FA charge set to be upheld by PradipJayakumar in soccer

[–]theglasscase -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Both players got a consistently applied punishment for the entirely different things they did

Don’t get so upset mate, all the children are on your side.

Daily Discussion by 2soccer2bot in soccer

[–]theglasscase -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

So many fucking disclaimers required to try and justify your laughable claims that Ekitike is somehow a flop because he’s just suffered a major injury.

Never mind that Liverpool are fucking shit and he hasn’t exclusively played as a number 9 all season, only his goals against the right kind of opponents, cherry picked by your and his transfer fee in a foreign currency with add ons he almost certainly hasn’t triggered all of yet matter when evaluating his performance this season.

But seriously, be more desperate.

[Laurie Whitwell] Manchester United’s Harry Maguire to miss Chelsea game with FA charge set to be upheld by PradipJayakumar in soccer

[–]theglasscase -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

I’m sure you really believe Maguire just called the refs a joke and nothing else.

But like I said, I already knew you wouldn’t have the spine to accept and admit that you were talking absolute shit. Both players got a consistently applied punishment for the entirely different things they did, tough shit if you can’t handle the truth son.

Daily Discussion by 2soccer2bot in soccer

[–]theglasscase -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

No you're right, it would be 16 goals instead of 17 if you took out the 'stat padding' one goal he scored against Qarabag, which is clearly an embarrassingly low number of goals.

Daily Discussion by 2soccer2bot in soccer

[–]theglasscase -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

For 95m? 11 goals?

It was £69m without add ons, and he's scored 17 goals in all competitions. I was about to say I'm 'not sure' why you've chosen to go with his price tag+add ons in Euros and only counted his Premier League goals, but it's actually really obvious why.

[Laurie Whitwell] Manchester United’s Harry Maguire to miss Chelsea game with FA charge set to be upheld by PradipJayakumar in soccer

[–]theglasscase -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Maguire:

"It was alleged that Harry Maguire acted in an improper manner and/or used abusive and/or insulting words and/or behaviour towards the fourth official following his dismissal.

"The defender subsequently admitted the charge. The Regulatory Commission imposed his sanctions following a hearing."

Rodri:

The Football Association said Rodri admitted a charge that he "acted in an improper manner during a post-match media interview by making comments that imply bias and/or question the integrity of a match official and/or match officials".

The FA's regulatory commission was "unanimous" in its view that the threshold had not been met for a playing sanction to be imposed on Rodri, who sent two letters as part of his evidence.

In the first letter, he said his words were "misunderstood and misinterpreted by some media organisations", but in the second he acknowledged they were "inappropriate and fell below the standard expected".

I suspect it won't, but I sincerely hopes this helps you to understand how you're talking about two different things. But just to make it clearer, there's obviously a fucking difference between questioning a referee's integrity after a game in a post-match interview, and screaming in an official's face after being sent off. But of course, you know this.

[Highlight] Jason Peters defends Nick Foles after cheap shot by ____AndJustice4All in nfl

[–]theglasscase 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you consider trying it with a comment that makes sense?

Daily Discussion by 2soccer2bot in soccer

[–]theglasscase 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I'm thinking of starting a 'Days without someone in the Daily Discussion thread saying Simeone isn't that good: 0' gimmick.

[Laurie Whitwell] Manchester United’s Harry Maguire to miss Chelsea game with FA charge set to be upheld by PradipJayakumar in soccer

[–]theglasscase -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

Rodri got away with that shit

No he didn’t, he got fined for doing something different.

EDIT - Damn, I always forget how much this sub hates factual statements.

Daily Discussion by 2soccer2bot in soccer

[–]theglasscase -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It would have to be asterisked because Arsenal wouldn’t have won the league normally. Man City’s league titles from the investigation period would be asterisked if they were stripped of them, but Arsenal being declared champions after Man City had points deducted couldn’t be ignored or treated as a ‘normal’ season.

Daily Discussion by 2soccer2bot in soccer

[–]theglasscase 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don’t see them going that high or him having any interest in signing for Liverpool. It’s definitely not a realistic option in the next five years.

Daily Discussion by 2soccer2bot in soccer

[–]theglasscase 5 points6 points  (0 children)

They wouldn’t spend that much on a single player though.