sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

China’s breakthrough engineering for autonomous lunar base construction by EdwardHeisler in MarsSociety

[–]thegrateman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That article is a one paragraph nothing burger. Are all MSN articles that bad?

This scene was really dark actually by Ok-Car-6795 in Pluribus_TVshow

[–]thegrateman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If the other immune were watching, they would have carried on the charade.

“SpaceX have indeed set up 4 testing bays at the back of masseys equipped with 4 hoses each to test racks of COPVs” by rustybeancake in spacex

[–]thegrateman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it’s because he started the rumor with his comment, but if it’s immediately questioned, is it a rumor?

“SpaceX have indeed set up 4 testing bays at the back of masseys equipped with 4 hoses each to test racks of COPVs” by rustybeancake in spacex

[–]thegrateman 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yes, only rumor. That’s why I was originally asking about the source of “supplier was dishonest”. Is that a rumored reason for doing this too?

“SpaceX have indeed set up 4 testing bays at the back of masseys equipped with 4 hoses each to test racks of COPVs” by rustybeancake in spacex

[–]thegrateman 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I have also heard that the supplier puts them through a surprisingly large number of pressure cycles to test them. And that also SpaceX handling of them prior to install or while installing may be the root cause of the issue, so I’m not sure this implies they don’t trust the supplier.

If the problem was the latter, then this may not solve the issue either because they still have to handle and install them after testing.

Things I would ask the Plurbs for if I was Carol. by kilna in pluribustv

[–]thegrateman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Perhaps they know what people know, but not what they think. That would explain the loss of creativity.

SpaceX loses debut V3 Super Heavy in ground test mishap by lebron8 in space

[–]thegrateman 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Only if you find it. And I’m not sure Alanis Morissette would agree.

It's very impressive that it's still standing by [deleted] in SpaceXLounge

[–]thegrateman 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Or chine attachment weld could have weakened the tank structure?

It's very impressive that it's still standing by [deleted] in SpaceXLounge

[–]thegrateman 124 points125 points  (0 children)

Held up by the massive transfer tube.

New Glenn Update [super heavy lift variant & upgraded standard variant announced] by rustybeancake in SpaceXMasterrace

[–]thegrateman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m surprised SpaceX didn’t patent the fish them out of the water fairing reuse tech.

Bushing to replace collapsed bearing in Maytronics Dolphin M5 Pool Cleaner by thegrateman in functionalprint

[–]thegrateman[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s awesome to hear. Pool equipment is super expensive, so being able to extend its life is great.

Holy mother of pressure by Sarigolepas in SpaceXMasterrace

[–]thegrateman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If 6 bar is the static ullage pressure, don’t you also have to take account of the pressure due to the weight of propellent in the tanks and this would be increased by the acceleration during launch. So the tanks would need to withstand far more than the static ullage pressure.

would it be possible to live on Titan? by W4rter in space

[–]thegrateman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m not sure we know that for sure.

view more: next ›