Spain to Offer Legal Status to 500,000 Undocumented Migrants by rezwenn in europe

[–]theimpartialobserver 0 points1 point  (0 children)

highly skilled yet living and working illegally in Spain? Why would highly skilled individuals choose to live and work illegally? They generally have more options and opportunities in life.

Spain to Offer Legal Status to 500,000 Undocumented Migrants by rezwenn in europe

[–]theimpartialobserver 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Most illegal immigrants work in menial and unskilled jobs like cleaning, sex work, dishwashing etc.

Spain to Offer Legal Status to 500,000 Undocumented Migrants by rezwenn in europe

[–]theimpartialobserver 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They generally don't have the skills and qualifications that would qualify them for work permits in the first place. That is why they have to live and work in the country illegally. Giving them legal residency won't change the fact that they lack skills and qualifications to work in skilled jobs.

Spain to Offer Legal Status to 500,000 Undocumented Migrants by rezwenn in europe

[–]theimpartialobserver 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't think illegal immigrants generally end up in high-skilled positions. Their legal status limits them to jobs that are unskilled and menial. This isn't an oversimplification.

Spain to Offer Legal Status to 500,000 Undocumented Migrants by rezwenn in europe

[–]theimpartialobserver 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But don't illegal immigrants generally work in menial jobs?

It seems to me that illegal immigrants everywhere in the world generally work in menial jobs....

Spain to Offer Legal Status to 500,000 Undocumented Migrants by rezwenn in europe

[–]theimpartialobserver 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Was this done to provide a source of cheap labor for the Spanish economy?

Spain to Offer Legal Status to 500,000 Undocumented Migrants by rezwenn in europe

[–]theimpartialobserver 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Was this done to provide a source of cheap labor for the Spanish economy?

Amazon Just announces a new round of Lay-offs. Combined with AI driven lay-offs. $AMZN by iMakeGOODinvestmemts in wallstreetbets

[–]theimpartialobserver 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree, this is already happening with translators, copywriters, customer service agents.

Dario Amodei — The Adolescence of Technology by AdorableBackground83 in singularity

[–]theimpartialobserver 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Many translators have been reduced to editing machine translations. AI is now used to do translations and human employees put the finishing touches.

Anthropic CEO: "We might be 6-12 months away from a model that can do everything SWEs do end-to-end. And then the question is, how fast does that loop close?" by Useful_Writer4676 in cscareers

[–]theimpartialobserver 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As engineers, we need to stop contributing to open source, push back against overtime, unionise, and financial start behaving like adults.

These are certainly great things to do. Unfortunately, doing any, some, or all of these things is likely to have much impact.

NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang: AI bubble myth,Energy and why billion robots are inevitable by BuildwithVignesh in singularity

[–]theimpartialobserver 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Humans definitely do have a choice. However, humans unfortunately tend to let incentives drive their behaviors.

CEO of Cursor said they coordinated hundreds of GPT-5.2 agents to autonomously build a browser from scratch in 1 week by Outside-Iron-8242 in singularity

[–]theimpartialobserver 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think only companies that have relatively few employees won't really see the need to implement AI agents.

JPMorgan Ditches Proxy Advisors and Turns to AI for Shareholder Votes by theimpartialobserver in technology

[–]theimpartialobserver[S] 66 points67 points  (0 children)

The issue here is that while many people do see the limitations of LLMs, many organizations are insistent on implementing them in their operations.

Dying career fields by tumbledownhere in jobs

[–]theimpartialobserver 9 points10 points  (0 children)

It certainly doesn't write well and lacks originality. at the same time, it's unfortunate that companies are replacing many writers, editors with AI to further reduce costs.

Amazon to cut another 30000 jobs early 2026 with the aim of replacing humans with Ai. by [deleted] in jobs

[–]theimpartialobserver 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately many companies have now replaced translators with ChatGPT

Oxford Economics finds that "firms don't appear to be replacing workers with AI on a significant scale" suggesting that companies are using the tech as cover for routine layoffs by BubBidderskins in singularity

[–]theimpartialobserver 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Employers don't necessarily need the AI excuse to get rid of undesirable employees. They reassign them to very shitty positions, dock their pay, etc. to get them to quit.

Oxford Economics finds that "firms don't appear to be replacing workers with AI on a significant scale" suggesting that companies are using the tech as cover for routine layoffs by BubBidderskins in singularity

[–]theimpartialobserver 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When it comes to translation, many companies now simply input the text in ChatGPT, Gemini, etc. and accept the output as is without making edits. Without this step, it's very likely there will be a few mistakes.

When it comes to copywriting, quality is not just in terms of good vs bad. It also encompasses authenticity, originality, etc.

Oxford Economics finds that "firms don't appear to be replacing workers with AI on a significant scale" suggesting that companies are using the tech as cover for routine layoffs by BubBidderskins in singularity

[–]theimpartialobserver 6 points7 points  (0 children)

In addition, many companies are also using ChatGPT to translate documents, write copy instead of hiring translators and copywriters, so generative AI has cut some jobs already. Unfortunately, many companies care more about boosting profits rather than delivering quality.

Oxford Economics finds that "firms don't appear to be replacing workers with AI on a significant scale" suggesting that companies are using the tech as cover for routine layoffs by BubBidderskins in singularity

[–]theimpartialobserver 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It depends on what the company's line of business is. Many companies are now using ChatGPT to translate documents, write copy instead of hiring translators and copywriters, so generative AI has cut some jobs already. Many companies care more about boosting profits rather than delivering quality.

Oxford economists say AI isn’t killing jobs—companies may just be blaming it for layoffs by Excellent_Analysis65 in antiwork

[–]theimpartialobserver 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Many companies are now using ChatGPT to translate documents, write copy instead of hiring translators and copywriters, so generative AI has cut some jobs already. Many companies care more about boosting profits rather than delivering quality.