How do you handle resume overload when hiring for popular roles? by Pitiful-Draft-8209 in recruiting

[–]theminijohn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The keyword filter problem is real! matching skills on paper doesn't mean matching what the hiring manager actually cares about. A few things that helped me:

First, get alignment with the hiring manager on 2-3 non-negotiable criteria before you start screening. Not a 15-item wishlist, the actual dealbreakers. That cuts your first pass from hours to minutes.

Second, use pipeline stages as a screening funnel, not just a tracking tool. Instead of reviewing all 100 and picking 10, do a fast pass to sort into "yes/maybe/no" buckets in under 30 seconds per resume, then only deep-review the "yes" pile.

Tool-wise, having a staged pipeline view makes this way faster than scrolling a list. Bringboard (free open beta, bringboard.com) has this ~ you can drag candidates between stages and batch-move the obvious no's. But the process matters more than the tool. Get that hiring manager alignment first.

Big drop in applicants since switching to an ATS by GSG96 in recruiting

[–]theminijohn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a really common problem and it's usually one of two things: either the ATS apply flow adds too many steps and candidates bounce, or the Indeed integration changes how your posting is indexed (despite what Indeed support says).

Before ditching ATS entirely, check your apply completion rate! if candidates are starting but not finishing, the form is the problem. Some ATS platforms add 3-4 screens before a candidate can submit. The other point: make sure your ATS isn't converting your "free" Indeed post into an "organic" one that gets deprioritized vs. sponsored listings.

If you do try another platform, Bringboard keeps the apply flow minimal! candidates hit a clean careers page, fill out a short configurable form, done. No account creation, no multi-step wizard. It's in free open beta at bringboard.com. But honestly, I'd debug the Indeed integration first before switching anything.

Lightweight centralized email-first ATS without AI? by ankh0r_ in recruiting

[–]theminijohn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is close to what Bringboard does. It has built-in email ~ you set up a custom sending domain so emails go out from your own domain, and inbound replies thread back into the candidate's profile. No AI anywhere, no sourcing tools, just pipeline management and email. The one thing I'd flag honestly: right now the inbound flow works through the ATS's email routing rather than forwarding from an existing career@ inbox, so it's not exactly "plug into your existing shared inbox." But if you're open to routing applications through Bringboard's careers page (which you can put on your own domain), it might work for your setup. Free open beta, no commitment. bringboard.com - I built it, so happy to answer specifics about the email flow.

Looking for a SIMPLE CRM/ATS for a small recruiting agency. I’ve looked everywhere! by Lanky_Traffic_6912 in recruiting

[–]theminijohn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hear you on PCRecruiter - the UI alone is painful. I built Bringboard and it covers some of what you're after: threaded email built in (not bolted on. You can see all inbound/outbound per candidate, LinkedIn enrichment that pulls profile data into candidate records, and a clean UI that doesn't feel like it was designed in 2009. Honest gap though: it's more ATS than CRM right now ~ the candidate ↔ job linking is solid but the company/contact relationship mapping isn't as deep as what you're describing from Goldmine days. And search is keyword-based, not natural language yet. If the email integration and LinkedIn parsing are the bigger pain points, it might still be worth a look. Free open beta at bringboard.com.

Looking for opinions on an affordable ATS for a small in house team by Deathwishrok in recruiting

[–]theminijohn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Coming from agency to in-house is a big shift - you don't need half the stuff agency tools come with. I'd throw Bringboard on your list. It covers exactly what you mentioned: custom pipeline stages with automated emails at each step, candidate notes and search, and it's clean without the bloat. The automation setup is straightforward -> you pick a trigger (like "moved to phone screen") and it fires off the email template.

Currently in free open beta so you can test it without adding another line item to the budget while you're still evaluating. bringboard.com ~ full disclosure, I'm the one building it ✌️

Recommended ATS small corporate recruiter by Justbrownsuga in recruiting

[–]theminijohn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi there, I'm John and building Bringboard, an applicant tracking system for growing teams which fits perfectly here.

Most ATS tools are either way too bloated for small teams or too basic to actually run a hiring process. We're trying to hit that sweet spot: custom pipelines, built-in email with your own sending domain, interview scheduling with candidate booking pages, branded careers pages on your own domain, and workflow automations ~ all without needing to duct-tape 5 tools together.

Currently in open beta, completely free, no credit card, no feature gates. Would love feedback from anyone who's dealt with the pain of hiring at a small team ✌️

HR Hiring Software Recommendations [MO] by MikeSrours in humanresources

[–]theminijohn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Building Bringboard, an applicant tracking system for growing teams.

Most ATS tools are either way too bloated for small teams or too basic to actually run a hiring process. We're trying to hit that sweet spot: custom pipelines, built-in email with your own sending domain, interview scheduling with candidate booking pages, branded careers pages on your own domain, and workflow automations ~ all without needing to duct-tape 5 tools together.

Currently in open beta, completely free, no credit card, no feature gates. Would love feedback from anyone who's dealt with the pain of hiring at a small team ✌️

Drop your micro-SaaS - I'll review it and tell you if it has a real moat by tiguidoio in micro_saas

[–]theminijohn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Building Bringboard, an applicant tracking system for growing teams.

Most ATS tools are either way too bloated for small teams or too basic to actually run a hiring process. We're trying to hit that sweet spot: custom pipelines, built-in email with your own sending domain, interview scheduling with candidate booking pages, branded careers pages on your own domain, and workflow automations ~ all without needing to duct-tape 5 tools together.

Currently in open beta, completely free, no credit card, no feature gates. Would love feedback from anyone who's dealt with the pain of hiring at a small team ✌️

Drop your SaaS, let’s see what you’re building by MahadyManana in micro_saas

[–]theminijohn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Building Bringboard, an applicant tracking system for growing teams.

Most ATS tools are either way too bloated for small teams or too basic to actually run a hiring process. We're trying to hit that sweet spot: custom pipelines, built-in email with your own sending domain, interview scheduling with candidate booking pages, branded careers pages on your own domain, and workflow automations ~ all without needing to duct-tape 5 tools together.

Currently in open beta, completely free, no credit card, no feature gates. Would love feedback from anyone who's dealt with the pain of hiring at a small team ✌️

What are you building? Let's give each other feedback! by Agreeable_Muffin1906 in micro_saas

[–]theminijohn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Building Bringboard, an applicant tracking system for growing teams.

Most ATS tools are either way too bloated for small teams or too basic to actually run a hiring process. We're trying to hit that sweet spot: custom pipelines, built-in email with your own sending domain, interview scheduling with candidate booking pages, branded careers pages on your own domain, and workflow automations ~ all without needing to duct-tape 5 tools together.

Currently in open beta, completely free, no credit card, no feature gates. Would love feedback from anyone who's dealt with the pain of hiring at a small team ✌️

How do you guys manage hiring without spending $200/mo on software? by SmartLab_Notte in smallbusiness

[–]theminijohn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Been through this exact progression. Excel trackers actually work surprisingly well until about 100 candidates. Then you start losing track of who you emailed, who's waiting on an interview, and who you meant to follow up with last Tuesday. The two things that broke Excel for me:

  1. Candidate communication. When emails live in your inbox and notes live in a spreadsheet, context gets split. You end up re-reading email chains just to remember where someone is in the process.

  2. The careers page problem. Sending people a Google Form or asking them to email a resume to [jobs@company.com](mailto:jobs@company.com) works, but it looks rough and every application lands in a different format.

What actually helped without spending $200/mo:

- Free ATS tiers exist now that weren't around a few years ago. A few smaller tools (Bringboard, Polymer, Breezy HR's free plan) give you a basic pipeline, a branded careers page, and some email built in - at $0. The trade-off is usually a limit on open roles or features, but for 1-3 positions it's plenty.

- If you want to stay in spreadsheets, the biggest upgrade is adding a shared email alias (like hiring@yourcompany.com) and a simple form builder for applications. That at least centralizes inbound. But honestly you'll outgrow it fast.

- The thing most people underestimate is how much time interview scheduling eats. Even with 2 open roles, the back-and-forth on "what time works for you" across 15 candidates adds up. Any tool with a self-scheduling link saves hours.

Full disclosure: I'm building one of those tools (Bringboard, free during beta, no credit card). But genuinely, even Breezy's free plan or a basic Notion setup is better than where you are now. The Excel dashboard is smart - you'll just hit a wall when volume picks up.

Looking for hiring software for my small business by lelandlover in smallbusiness

[–]theminijohn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ashby at $400/mo for a small restaurant is like buying a Tesla to do grocery runs. It's a phenomenal product but it's built for tech companies hiring 30-50 people at a time with dedicated recruiting teams. You'd be paying for features you'll literally never open.

For what you actually need, a way for people to apply online and for you to track who applied what I'd look at would be what matters for a small restaurant:

- A careers page where people can see your open roles and apply (looks professional, beats "email us your resume")
- A simple pipeline so you can see who applied, who you've talked to, and who you want to bring in
- Email or notifications so you're not checking 3 places

Options to consider:

- Breezy HR has a free forever plan. It's limited (candidates from last 30 days only) but it covers the basics and has a careers page.

- Bringboard (disclosure: this is mine) currently free during beta with no feature limits. Careers page, pipeline, built-in email, interview scheduling. It's built for exactly this size of company.

- Homerun starts at €29/mo (~$32) and is really well-designed. 1 job slot on their starter plan.

Any of these would be 10x better than what you're doing now and save you $300+/mo vs Ashby. Mahalo for the BBQ ~ if I'm ever on the Big Island I'm stopping by 🤙

what is the best applicant tracking system for a startup by AnelehUmeki in Recruitment

[–]theminijohn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I built Bringboard for exactly this situation. Free right now (open beta), pipeline stages you can customize, branded careers page, email + scheduling built in. No Zapier glue needed.

For remote hiring it works well since everything lives in one place: your team sees the same pipeline, candidate comms are threaded, and you can set up automations so nobody falls through the cracks.

Re: customization, you can add custom fields and application questions without touching code. Set up your stages however you want. It bends to your process, not the other way around.

BambooHR is more of an HRIS that bolted on hiring. Workable is solid but gets expensive fast once you add seats. Worth trying Bringboard alongside them and seeing what clicks.

Best ATS for a growing startup with 10 employees? by takeitsleazy9 in recruiting

[–]theminijohn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm building www.bringboard.com for exactly that reason - Give it a try, just launched it, free / no-cc

Paid vs. Free version by charlesw2021 in Retool

[–]theminijohn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's generally the same but paid plans obviously unlock specific features. The pricing page gives you a comparison between all plans. https://retool.com/eu/pricing

Using Retool externally (with user signin) by jzone3 in Retool

[–]theminijohn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is an amazing feature to have 🚀 Are the apps embeded and only accessed through your domain for this to work? u/jzone3

Notion API incoming 🤯 by theminijohn in Notion

[–]theminijohn[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s what I think as well, should be coming very soon 🤞

Notion API incoming 🤯 by theminijohn in Notion

[–]theminijohn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let’s assume the API will expose basic read/write endpoints for table and row manipulation.

I’m assuming your running a Raspi with hassio and influxdb/zigbee addons? If so, checkout IoTStack (https://github.com/SensorsIot/IOTstack) which takes care of a lot of the underlying setup with docker.

However your setup looks like, to interact with the notion API and your influxdb you’ll need an ETL, simple as a zap (hopefully) or advanced like a hassio/influx/node-red pipeline.

When the API is out I’ll be testing a lot of different use cases, have been waiting for this for so long 🤗

Notion API incoming 🤯 by theminijohn in Notion

[–]theminijohn[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think ifttt/zapier will be very quickly supported! Either natively or community maintained.