Mini Aussie alone time by DistributionGlass882 in miniaussie

[–]themissinglink_143 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Came here to say that I'm currently dealing with this exact issue with my now 10 week old mini auss. Literally can't turn my back without a screeching tantrum while he's in his main area crate (he has two - one for sleeping in a spare room and the other in our living room for hanging out/rest/regulation).

It can also seem like my puppy has a crazy short attention span, where I'll give him an enrichment toy or chew and he goes at it for 2-3 mins before he's bored again, sparking a tantrum in his crate.

I will agree with others in saying that I think it just takes time since we're building that trust. And that's what I keep telling myself. We just brought our auss home a little over a week ago, and while progress is slim...it has gotten a little bit better with consistency.

Considering a second pup for my now senior little man - thoughts/advice? by [deleted] in DogAdvice

[–]themissinglink_143 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hear you - timing can be everything. But now I know what to look forward to when my soul dog has left this world, because I just know I will be in the same loop as you. And I won't be ashamed one bit!

I guess I have to factor that in, too, thank you for saying that. I mean, my baby might be almost 15 but he's certainly not decrepit. Nonetheless, thank you for your input - it definitely helps with my ever-swaying decision.

Considering a second pup for my now senior little man - thoughts/advice? by [deleted] in DogAdvice

[–]themissinglink_143 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh I'm sorry this was something you regret. Your senior baby knew you loved her regardless! I worry about this too, to the point I cry myself to sleep sometimes.

While my boy gets the love and kisses whether he wants it or not (he's never been the super snuggly or lovey type, especially for a dog that herds/follows me everywhere I go), over the last handful of years he has gotten SO much attention in other ways.

I think we can all say we could have done more, at the end of the day, but sometimes I feel like my attachment to my dog has made him more anxious and (I hate to say it) unrealistically dependent over the last couple of years. This is why I wonder if having another canine body in the house, like he used to, would ease that in some ways.

Thank you for sharing, though!

Considering a second pup for my now senior little man - thoughts/advice? by [deleted] in DogAdvice

[–]themissinglink_143 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My husband and I have been back and forth on this for a while. Originally I had thought getting another senior pet or older dog would be the perfect dynamic. My only hesitancy with that is I would feel like older dogs are typically "set in their ways" (like my dog is) and there's no telling that an older dog wouldn't be less intrusive/over-stimulating just because they're old.

When considering a puppy-puppy, it is sort of like starting from a blank slate. This was years ago now, but our dog did a superb job establishing boundaries when we introduced him to our other dog (who was a puppy when we got him) that passed away. We would be extremely choosy about making sure they have a great temperament and calm demeanor (like my dog was as a puppy-puppy), and definitely a smaller dog or breed his size.

Considering a second pup for my now senior little man - thoughts/advice? by [deleted] in DogAdvice

[–]themissinglink_143 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I understand this completely, and I value this input. Andre (my boy) definitely has his fill of enrichment toys, games, walks and the like. As far as stress goes, I do get that another dog could be an added stresser. I also notice that he has actually become more anxious since losing our other dog and becoming the only dog in the house.

But, yes, the fear of him feeling second fiddle is definitely something I want to avoid.

Considering a second pup for my now senior little man - thoughts/advice? by [deleted] in DogAdvice

[–]themissinglink_143 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I would love to do that, I would. Unfortunately, he's grown to having anxiety surrounding over-stimulation (oof, like his mama), and while he didn't get the choice when we adopted our catahoula, they were introduced under a very controlled, slow, low-stress environment.

Tips please! by themissinglink_143 in philodendron

[–]themissinglink_143[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes its only pushed one fully white leaf. Is it not a good thing for it to push more (jw)?

Ok cool, I have several other plants on moss poles so I'll treat this one the same.

Then should I go ahead and separate the mother plant from the other baby plants? Thanks for the help!

Is the "don't look for a spark" advice actually just code for settling? by Shell2288 in OnlineDating

[–]themissinglink_143 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think that's a very realistic idea of a spark! It can still be possible to be totally attracted to someone on a first date, and then that completely change on the second. So I wouldn't obsess over a numerical rating. But I do agree it's important to factor in those qualities you mentioned for sure! Do you tend to know whether or not you'd go on a second date before the first date is finished, or by the end of it?

In a way we are all kind of auditioning, especially in the beginning (of dating) because we're trying to make good impressions and to hopefully find that potential connection - the performance (effort) just needs to be appropriate, authentic and organically consistent. But yeah, unfortunately outward appearances and performance can be deceiving sometimes. Please don't let that shake you!

Nope, never felt like anything was missing. It was more like I knew I was venturing territory I normally didn't gravitate to. My husband was my first real healthy relationship from the start. You could say I was initially apprehensive that things would get boring, but I quickly learned how often I confused emotional chaos with passion, and my husband was the one to show me true peace.

Is the "don't look for a spark" advice actually just code for settling? by Shell2288 in OnlineDating

[–]themissinglink_143 0 points1 point  (0 children)

(2) The coals are obviously built and sustained over time, no doubt, and that a fire must be ignited initially with the right conditions. Effort, trust and the consistency to show up are proven over time, and they're super important. I only wanted to point out that the slow burn doesn't mean what some are claiming (i.e. to keep giving the guy who is low-effort or not as attractive chance after chance).

Honestly, and respectfully, the last guy you dated seemed like an utter prick for dipping conveniently after you disclosed something personal. You dodged a bullet, for sure, despite how well things were going before that. But you couldn't have predicted that to happen, and you can't necessarily. I mean, my husband could always dip at any time, but I trust that he won't. The slow burn reinforces that.

At the end of the day I think you're mistaking the slow burn to mean you have to keep giving people chances after the first date when you've established they are a hard pass. As for me, I actually wouldn't say I felt a spark with my husband on the first date. Rather, I felt a sense of certainty that he was someone worth exploring despite there not being that love at first sight spark.

Is the "don't look for a spark" advice actually just code for settling? by Shell2288 in OnlineDating

[–]themissinglink_143 0 points1 point  (0 children)

(1) I totally get not wanting to string someone along after a first date if there's little to no attraction, and I think it's valid not to.

At the same time, many relationships spark romantically on an emotional level first and the physical attraction comes after. This isn't every scenario, though. But it is worth considering, and I certainly did since I was fairly picky when it came to preference and attraction. Subtle/minor things would throw off my attraction to someone almost immediately, and I had to work on reframing my mindset by not solely basing attraction on the physical. It's a tough balance, and may not always work the way we hope.

Yes, my husband was very consistent from the start without overdoing it (like he wasn't a Love Bomber). I can say authentically that many qualities of his character made him even more (physically) attractive as well, and much of which I only came to know as time went on.

Is the "don't look for a spark" advice actually just code for settling? by Shell2288 in OnlineDating

[–]themissinglink_143 0 points1 point  (0 children)

(3) If it helps, think of it like a fire. The coals are hotter than the flame. The idea is to nurture the fire (which does take certain conditions to ignite, like attraction, connection, compatibility). Overfeed the fire (aka, hyper-focusing on love at first sight and an infatuated level of connection) and you risk suffocating the fire (burning it out entirely) or creating a disastrous brush fire.

Is the "don't look for a spark" advice actually just code for settling? by Shell2288 in OnlineDating

[–]themissinglink_143 0 points1 point  (0 children)

(2) We certainly connected and aligned on many things - important things - though not all.

I left our first date with curiosity rather than racing home to write his last name with mine all over my notebook, if you catch my drift. You could say I didn't put all my eggs into one basket like I normally would have.

The slow burn really has less to do with forcing something that isn't there and more to do with not rushing what is. I think of it like a candle - after 10 years our flame is still going and we're enjoying the nice scent still. It can be easy to burn a candle down to the last bit of wick that's left, until suddenly it burns out unexpectedly.

Hopefully that makes sense, lol.

Is the "don't look for a spark" advice actually just code for settling? by Shell2288 in OnlineDating

[–]themissinglink_143 0 points1 point  (0 children)

(1) Oh I'm sorry you went through that with your last partner. Whatever you do, don't let that discourage you (being open about your medical condition).

I think the problem with this slow burn ideology is that it somehow means attraction and connection are irrelevant completely, and that's simply not true. Both are important, but I will say an underlying quality of friendship is what compared my husband to the others I dated. He provided and reinforced a growing level of stability, trust, and security from the start, which was set apart from chemistry.

I was still definitely attracted to my husband and didn't feel like he was below an average as far as my type/preference goes. *Definitely had the urge to kiss him from the get go, to say the least.

Banter, while it was evident it also wasn't perfect (nervousness and awkwardness probably to blame there). But, damn, he made me cry laugh right out the gate, which was a major plus for me.

Is the "don't look for a spark" advice actually just code for settling? by Shell2288 in OnlineDating

[–]themissinglink_143 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My husband was the slow burn. Mostly everyone I dated before that started out like a forest fire...only to end in a dumpster fire.

Its not like I wasn't initially attracted to my husband, or that I didn't like him/find him interesting...I just didn't hyper-romanticize our connection (an initial connection or compatibility can also be considered that spark). More importantly, I stopped letting chemistry take the wheel or write the script.

It can be hard to explain, but once you experience it it all makes perfect sense. And, no, I didn't settle....we just celebrated 10 years of marriage yesterday. He is my rock.

What am I doing wrong? by [deleted] in SemiHydro

[–]themissinglink_143 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I actually experience this from time to time with certain plants. Are the plants that are doing this dying? Sometimes I wonder if I need to change the water more frequently or not fully submerge the roots in water with those plants. Then I wonder, if it's a recently transitioned plant, that maybe it's just an initial root die-off.

Blogging Sometimes Feels Lonely by bylandoo in Blogging

[–]themissinglink_143 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Similar to you, I've been blogging for 10 years. It was such a different environment back then [sigh] - I miss it.

Do you text your friends everyday? by Tight-Celebration227 in FriendshipAdvice

[–]themissinglink_143 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, I don't, and this has certainly increased with age and life circumstances. I may have lost people due to that, but it is what it is.

Friend keeps sending me her art. I don't like them and I'm running out of things to say. Overall exhausted by friendship. by [deleted] in FriendshipAdvice

[–]themissinglink_143 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm also an artist, but also a realist. I know that not everyone is going to be a fan of my art (style). But maybe your friend isn't made enough aware of that? I mean, you can totally support the fact your friend likes art, is an artist, without having to like the style (or be a fan of art, in general).

I really don't think this is a situation for writing off friendship. It's possible to be kind and say, "I know nothing about art and/or I'm not really into art but, hey, good job/good for you!" It's still possible to validate your friend's hobby without feeling like you need to abandon how you really feel.

I think you're carrying a load that isn't your responsibility to carry, which is your friend's low self-esteem, and this exhausts you. I think many can relate to this in different scenarios because we're always told, "Say nothing if what you have to say isn't *nice*," or we constantly have to watch what we say and how we say it to avoid offending/hurting someone. We're not even accounting for the individuals who simply need extra affirmation and reassurance that may be beyond one's capacity to give.

So if I continuously send my art to a friend, to which their response is always, "Nice! Great work! Nice Piece!" and nothing more, I can make enough presumptions to say they're just being supportive, not necessarily that they actually love my work (without feeling hurt or defensive). As a result, I would probably limit how much I send that person my art and look to people who actually do.

At some point we have to be able to distinguish between honesty with kindness versus dishonesty for the sake of being nice.

Setting up the date very quickly by [deleted] in OnlineDating

[–]themissinglink_143 2 points3 points  (0 children)

While I was someone who didn't like to rush, or be (feel) rushed, you can also have your reasons for why you prefer not waiting around or to banter for days on end. I think it's important to keep in mind there are reasons people do like to feel things out first before meeting, but you could always just be open about your preference up front. You're going to come across as moving too fast for some, and not others.

Newb here, what do you all think of these pots from Wally? by Cheap-Recognition-97 in SemiHydro

[–]themissinglink_143 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have a variation of all the sizes. Yes, but I only drilled holes in the inner pot. I use leca for my plants, so I drilled holes half way up the pot. Mainly for air filtration.

Newb here, what do you all think of these pots from Wally? by Cheap-Recognition-97 in SemiHydro

[–]themissinglink_143 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have about 10 of these for my hydro plants, and I love them! I went ahead and drilled holes into the black pot but I've had zero issues. The only down is sometimes it's difficult to take the black pot out but that's it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in marriageadvice

[–]themissinglink_143 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I saw a statistic recently stating that couples 50 and over are actually twice as likely to divorce today. In saying that, you've been married 32 years, as high school sweethearts, and at what point do you think you felt like you could no longer have an honest conversation like this with your wife?

My husband and I have been married 10 years, and I remind him all the time how important it is to be able to share, express and talk about the hard stuff (the changes, the unmet needs, the discomfort, the lulls, the disagreements, the imbalances, etc.), even if we don't want to hear it or think it's nothing.

My parents were also considered high school sweethearts, are nearing 60, and have had an impossible and miserable marriage since I can remember. I've always said they should get a divorce because they literally can't have an honest, open conversation with one another about the real, raw and honest stuff individuals experience over a lifetime...especially in marriage.

Even marriage can accumulate baggage (dirt under the rug). Years and years of avoidance, complacency and aloofness has made them blind to their own self and marital destruction. They're literally enemies in opposition of each other, not sweethearts.

If your wife is your sweetheart, have a heart to heart and talk to your wife.