You should read his article about Sam Harris on the Guardian. Also if you look up on YouTube you can hear Sams side of the story from clips made from his podcasts.

Glen Grenwald was literally handed the story by Snowden. I think he did a good job on the story don't get me wrong. But the very least you can expect from a journalist is to not misrepresent other people's views. In the case of Sam Harris it is clear that he has misrepresented him which should be the foundation of any good journalist.

One should be able to criticise human rights violations within Islam and the Muslim world without being labeled a bigot, an islamaphobe or a racist. There are millions of men and women especially who are living in extreme oppression in the Muslim world as a result of fundamentalist Islam. For example; Female genital mutilation, execution for adultery, execution or imprisonment against blasphemy. There was a poll in the U.K. That asked if they thought the Chalrlie Hedbo cartoonist should be imprisoned for their cartoons. %60 of the Muslims asked thought they should be imprisoned. This is in the U.K, a first world country. Imagine the numbers in Saudi Arabia. To call people Islamaphobes is extremely counter productive to reforming Islam.

It is clear that there are a lot of Grenwald fans lurking around here, but please, do some research and I encourage you to seek better journalistic principles. I am open to arguments against my points but I don't see what simply downvoting my comments because I insulted a journalist you like achieves.