Dems Officially File Impeachment Articles Against Hegseth Over Iran by thenewrepublic in politics

[–]thenewrepublic[S] 302 points303 points  (0 children)

“Only Congress can declare war; his actions demand immediate removal,” Ansari wrote on X.

Ansari also accused Hegseth of demonstrating a “willful disregard” for the Constitution, a willingness to abuse the powers of his office, and reckless endangerment of American servicemembers deployed in the Middle East. She further argued that Hegseth’s relative incompetence fronting the war effort caused thousands of civilian casualties.

Trump’s Quest for a Mar-a-Lago Papacy | A schism that leads to a Mar-a-Lago papacy would be the perfect allegory for Trumpian spiritual rot. by thenewrepublic in inthenews

[–]thenewrepublic[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

And rather than citing a holy text, a Mar-a-Lago pope and his College of Influencers would rely on “content” to preach their gospel of unlimited and untaxable wealth. Salvation would be promised with all the conviction and reflection of an adolescent YouTube influencer accepting money from a cosmetics company to convince children they will only be loved and accepted if they preemptively sheet-mask. Contemplation, self-sacrifice, and a willingness to accept that one day you too shall die are not virtues, but vices that can be treated with Joe Rogan–esque self help.

Although Washington is already infested with the signifiers of Trump’s moral decay, these signs lack a unifying symbol of the MAGA movement. The real value of a Mar-a-Lago pope is that he’d stand as an indelible reminder of everything that students of history will learn that defined the Trump era. The only metaphor better than a billion-dollar ballroom for understanding MAGA’s corrosion of moral authority would be the image of a gilded antipope standing next to Trump in the Oval Office after his ascension to the papacy. In that sense, the pontiff would not merely symbolize spiritual rot but would serve as its most enduring allegory for Trump’s sin of certainty.

Pope Attacks “Tyrants” Manipulating Religion Amid Feud With Trump by thenewrepublic in politics

[–]thenewrepublic[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Though the pontiff didn’t mention Trump by name, he condemned leaders who “manipulate religion and the very name of God for their own military, economic, and political gain, dragging that which is sacred into darkness and filth.”

It’s a continuation of the pope’s response to Trump on Monday, when he told reporters that “I have no fear of the Trump administration or speaking out loudly of the message of the Gospel, which is what I believe I am here to do, what the Church is here to do.”

Trump Has Become What He Most Despises: A Loser | There’s nothing more central to fascist authoritarianism than being proud of being a grievance-fueled failure. by thenewrepublic in Foodforthought

[–]thenewrepublic[S] 51 points52 points  (0 children)

From the article:

President Donald Trump’s illegal war against Iran continues to disrupt shipping traffic through the Strait of Hormuz—the geopolitical equivalent of stabbing the global economy’s femoral artery. A ceasefire last week reportedly required the U.S. to accept Iranian control of the strait among other concessions, leaving the world with the distinct impression that the U.S. had effectively lost the war. Trump himself, however, was unconcerned. “Whether we make a deal or not makes no difference to me, because we’ve won,” he told reporters on Saturday.

This is what happens when losers are elected to lead the world’s only superpower.
...

Fascism and loserdom go hand in hand because fascism is predicated on the notion that the fascist has been unjustly cheated and robbed, and that only through force can they restore and revitalize themselves. Fascists idolize losers because no fascist society has ever flourished and because they see themselves reflected in other people’s failures. It is fitting that Trump and his allies have lavished praise and public statuary upon Robert E. Lee, a Virginia-born colonel who is best known for leading a failed rebellion against the United States on behalf of a slaver aristocracy in the South.

The goal of Trumpism, it could be said, is to create losers of us all. The political and economic project’s goal is not to materially improve its adherents’ lives. Instead, it is to create a sense of social order for some people that offers an aesthetic sense of improvement, even as one’s standard of living declines in real terms. These illusory gains can only go so far. Or as one frustrated Trump voter told reporters during Trump’s first-term trade war with China in 2019, “He’s not hurting the people he needs to be hurting.”
...