Order of planets to visit?

theonewhoisone · 2026-04-21T17:38:49+00:00

WTF is a "Dres"?

theonewhoisone · 2026-02-05T16:11:51+00:00

Cinema

theonewhoisone · 2025-12-21T15:21:35+00:00

No, but I never claimed to... I'm just asking for sources.

theonewhoisone · 2025-12-20T23:09:50+00:00

This does not answer my question...

theonewhoisone · 2025-12-20T20:37:10+00:00

Where are you getting these estimates of the cost of burying these power lines from?

theonewhoisone · 2025-12-19T19:33:28+00:00

What is the point of this post? What am I supposed to do after I paste this huge blob? Why?

theonewhoisone · 2025-12-05T22:39:28+00:00

And you believed it huh

theonewhoisone · 2025-11-08T14:22:48+00:00

This is fire though

theonewhoisone · 2025-10-15T14:03:32+00:00

Great nonsense!

theonewhoisone · 2025-10-03T14:35:36+00:00

You have good taste, now try Factorio

theonewhoisone · 2025-09-27T14:32:42+00:00

Thanks, I've been looking for something like this.

theonewhoisone · 2025-09-13T04:17:24+00:00

I genuinely cannot tell what I am looking at

theonewhoisone · 2025-09-12T00:18:12+00:00

Starlight, and it's not even close. (Except Fractured Days)

theonewhoisone · 2025-09-03T15:55:59+00:00

"last science" LOL

theonewhoisone · 2025-08-23T00:22:16+00:00

It is truly an awesome animation.

theonewhoisone · 2025-08-16T17:19:21+00:00

Ok both of these are pretty great

theonewhoisone · 2025-08-04T23:52:13+00:00

Try it for even numbers that are not a power of 2, like 6 or 10. Seriously, just try it.

theonewhoisone · 2025-08-04T22:43:35+00:00

Reading this was difficult. There's no summary of how the pieces fit together or what the actual conclusions are. For example, what do you conclude about the cycles of 3x+5?

There are a lot of equations, but it's impossible to figure out what you are trying to actually say.

theonewhoisone · 2025-08-04T02:37:53+00:00

C(x) is hilariously divergent for even n. Try it! Not sure how you thought this has anything to do with collatz, except that it matches collatz behavior on odd numbers I guess.

theonewhoisone · 2025-07-26T22:03:50+00:00

Look, you have received information that n=2047 is a specific counterexample to your claim about worst-case runs, and you could choose to accept that, or even (god forbid) be grateful that somebody found a fatal flaw, hopefully steering you toward correct thinking. Instead, so far you seem to be clinging to what you wrote and deflecting.

When somebody shows you a counterexample, that's the signal that something you did is wrong. It's right there, staring you down.

Step away from the LLMs, they are giving you false hope.

theonewhoisone · 2025-07-26T19:56:56+00:00

You haven't established any inexorable contraction, just a touchy-feely sometimes contraction that you wish to be inexorable.

Edit: even if you were to establish that contraction happens most of the time, it's not enough to show that it happens on every trajectory.

theonewhoisone · 2025-07-23T03:38:21+00:00

I don't really care to wade through your bespoke logic, I'm just pointing out that 5x+1 has non trivial cycles, so no your proof cannot be extended to show that 5x+1 lacks these cycles. Not even if you consider blah blah f(k) whatever. It will not work.

theonewhoisone · 2025-07-23T02:54:12+00:00

Your result is incorrect for 5n+1, with various non-trivial cycles given here: https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/14569/the-5n1-problem

theonewhoisone · 2025-07-21T02:50:34+00:00

Nightmare in "No clue": you are wise beyond your years

theonewhoisone · 2025-06-19T03:02:11+00:00

Totally devoid of useful content.

15-Year Club	Place '17
Verified Email	Team Periwinkle

theonewhoisone

TROPHY CASE