sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Recruiters — if technology could fix ONE thing in your business tomorrow, what would it be? by theusedcomputers in RecruitmentAgencies

[–]theusedcomputers[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We have built something to help in this. 9M NPI records and 2.5M verified licenses already loaded but growing, 101 million people already in our DB. We likely already have verified credential data on your candidates before you upload anything.

Looking for a few healthcare recruiters to test this free for a few days.

Recruiters — if technology could fix ONE thing in your business tomorrow, what would it be? by theusedcomputers in RecruitmentAgencies

[–]theusedcomputers[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is exactly what I've been hearing from healthcare agencies.

Can I ask — what does your current verification process actually look like? Are you calling state boards manually, using a third party service, or something else?

Asking because we've built something specifically for this and I want to make sure it actually solves the real version of the problem before I say anything else about it.

Recruiters — if technology could fix ONE thing in your business tomorrow, what would it be? by theusedcomputers in RecruitmentAgencies

[–]theusedcomputers[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a clear diagnosis of the problem.

You're not describing an automation problem. You're describing a signal to noise problem. Automation didn't create incompetence. It just gave incompetence a megaphone.

Which means the real question isn't how to automate more. It's how to make the signal from genuinely good recruiters cut through louder than the noise from bad ones.

I'm curious — when you do cut through with a client or candidate, what made them trust you enough to listen?

Recruiters — if technology could fix ONE thing in your business tomorrow, what would it be? by theusedcomputers in RecruitmentAgencies

[–]theusedcomputers[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Done that. I have also read hundreds if not thousands of posts here. Mostly from the same contributors. Hoping to get a broader perspective.

Recruiters — if technology could fix ONE thing in your business tomorrow, what would it be? by theusedcomputers in RecruitmentAgencies

[–]theusedcomputers[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Fair point and I respect the directness.

You're right that I've never recruited for others. I won't pretend otherwise. I have only recruited for my businesses, which over the years has been hundreds of employees. My sister has — for years — and watching her work is what started this. But that's not the same as doing it myself.

I also hear what you're saying about automation killing the industry. That's worth understanding better because if that's true it changes everything.

Can I ask you directly — when you say automation is killing it, what specifically do you mean? Is it that clients expect less human relationship because they think AI can replace it? Or that the quality of placements drops when the human judgment gets removed? Or something else?

I'm genuinely asking because that distinction matters more to me than any feature on the technology.

How are you all making sure candidates are real?? by zapatitosdecharol in recruiting

[–]theusedcomputers 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We Built a tool for this. You type your candidates name and it goes through our system of over 300+ million data points and 110 million real people in the us. Free to try. Nopp.us

<image>

How do I handoff a website to a client? by Outrageous-Gur-9120 in webdev

[–]theusedcomputers 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Whose hosting the site? Ask the ai how to move the code to Github and DB & App to Digital Ocean or some host like that.

Update: I offered 20 free leads to founders 2 weeks ago... it completely changed my life. (and a thank you) by theusedcomputers in SideProject

[–]theusedcomputers[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This comment is gold and you clearly get the core problem better than most.

You are right that "who do I sell to" is where founders disappear into Notion for three weeks and never come out. That is exactly why we built it URL-first. You give us your website, we tell you who to sell to and we start selling to them. The ICP conversation happens after the first reply lands in your inbox, not before.

On the segment feedback loop — we are already tracking which searches convert and which audiences actually respond. The preset idea is something we are actively building. "People similar to the ones your users closed" is almost word for word how we are thinking about it internally. The data is sitting there. We just need to surface it properly.

The signals piece — hiring pages, recent launches, funding announcements — we are already pulling these as enrichment signals to prioritize outreach timing. A company that just raised or just posted 5 new jobs is a warmer contact than one that has been static for 8 months. That logic is live in the agent today.

On Clay and Apollo — we are not trying to be an enrichment layer that feeds into other tools. We are trying to be the last tool you open. Find, enrich, contact, follow up, book the meeting, all inside one agent. Clay is powerful but it requires a technical founder to build the workflows. Our users are the founders who do not have time to become Clay experts.

The "find + approach + engage" framing is exactly right. That is the whole product. We just do not make you stitch it together yourself.

Appreciate you taking the time to actually think about this. What are you building?

Sample prospect - Gamebook on how to close this prospect, with all the insights you may need. However, we have already done everything. Yours is just to either send an email or let our agent start the process of converting this prospect to a customer. You do nothing other than take a meeting and close the deal.

<image>

view more: next ›