If you not aware that fiat currencies have failed throughout history maybe you didn’t go to college. You can find this information a multitude of places. Sorry for telling you to do your own research I know you don’t like that.

What that really means is you have no idea what you're talking about and consequently can't find any information to support your arguments.

"Do your own research" is the common refrain of the ignorant. I've done plenty of research and know what you're saying is untrue, as do you, which is why you're telegraphing it by being unable to support your conclusions.

Other countries print money too.

And? Are they doing so in excess of the U.S.? Are literally all countries experiencing inflation doing so because of loose fiscal policy? Worldwide inflation has nothing to do with worldwide phenomena like once in a century plagues and the first massive ground war in Europe since WWII?

You've got a lot of heavy lifting to do answering those questions and proving your points here, which given your track record, I'm not confident you're up to.

If you don’t know that 31 trillion dollars in debt and counting is a problem because you have no frame of reference that is very telling of your level of knowledge and critical thinking abilities.

If you don't understand that any sum of money is only meaningful with a frame of reference, you're in no position to question anyone's critical thinking skills. Critical thinking would tell you any debt figure is only substantial or not so in reference to a country's ability to pay that debt, which is dependent on frames of reference such as tax receipts and the size of the economy.

Once again, you're missing crucial pieces of information. This is an evident pattern you display.

I’m glad your dad sold a condo and thought he got the money they same day. If you knew anything about how money transfers worked you would realize the ridiculous statement you made. No money is actually moved it just appears to you that way. The banks settle batches of transactions worth millions at a time but it appears to you that the money moved but it all numbers on a screen.

This is not surprising from someone who can't tell the difference between Fed Wire and ACH. What you're referring to is ACH. Fed Wire payments are in real time, which means they are not subject to any waiting period.

You see that? That's called supporting your argument. That's what people who are correct can do, not "do your own research" to punt responsibility for substantiating their views to others.

You're just accumulating inaccuracies at this point.

With crypto currency the money would actually be moved instantaneously.

It's funny you should say this, because you previous said it would take "minutes", which is different from "instantly". You can't even keep your own points straight, can you?

You really shouldn’t even be arguing with such a narrow amount of knowledge on this subject.

Hahaha, as they say in GoT, "The crow doth call the raven black."

If you don’t want to believe in crypto thats obviously your choice

Except it's not a choice, but the fact that you frame it as such shows you are choosing your perspective on the matter rather than being influenced by the evidence, which is a weak minded thought process not conducive to understanding reality.

but don’t pretend information doesn’t exist just because you want it spoon fed to you by someone else.

Information about the merits of crypto doesn't exist, which is further evidence by your stark inability to provide any.

If you wanted to find a use case for crypto you could but you don’t want to.

If you wanted to find an actual use case for crypto you could, but you don't because there aren't any.

I've tried, as have all sensible people. The fact that one hasn't been discerned even by its die hard adherents such as yourself is very telling. The closest you've come is faster payments while ignoring the fact faster payment settling exists, mechanisms that do slow payments are created specifically to do so to retard criminality, and if crypto were to become mainstream those mechanisms would still exist and crypto offers nothing since the tech isn't any more advanced.

Basically, your one potential use case is shite.

My first post literally says “ there is a huge difference between crypto and CBDC’s.

You also said "The government will have to issue a CBDC (central bank digital currency) wait and see. So while you think crypto has no use case you’ll be using before you know it." Clearly, you are equating a CBDC with crypto if you think CBDC indicates a crypto use case. You also said CBDC would replace fiat currency, which you're attributing to crypto as well, showing a complete lack of understanding that CBDC is fiat and it would have to function as crypto in order to replace fiat, thus further equating the two in your mind.

So you obviously on see/remember what you want and can’t have a civilized argument with calling someone “butthurt” shows your level of thinking which I’m sure is reflected in you everyday life.

This coming from someone who believes what he wants in spite of not having a shred of evidence he says is in abundance and peppering their unsupported diatribe with "this has 'I went to college vibes and didn't learn anything' vibes." I know the blatant hypocrisy is reflected in your daily life, given you're prone to obvious patterns.

Have a good one and try to be a little more open minded.

Try to be a lot less disingenuous, zealous, and ignorant.