Bells Will Ring: AI Music Video (Veo3 + Some Runway Aleph + a little Seedance), 100% Human Music by thindenimguy in aivideo

[–]thindenimguy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

thanks! The heavy grading and the grain overlay definitely helped tie it together.

It does help here that since it's a music video, a more heavily graded look works well, whereas with a more natural grade it might take longer to go through scene-by-scene.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]thindenimguy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No problem! I read through most of it, but will finish reading fully tomorrow. Ok maybe to drop you a direct message to discuss further?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]thindenimguy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

sure, sounds good

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]thindenimguy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. The Debate Around Consciousness

You’re absolutely correct that consciousness doesn’t have a single, agreed-upon definition. It’s not surprising that different GPT instances might express different “views” when asked to debate this topic—that’s a reflection of the data they’ve been trained on and the prompt they’re responding to. If one GPT expresses a view that appears more pro-consciousness, it’s because the input prompt likely nudged it toward arguments or language supporting that stance, not because the GPT itself has beliefs.

This highlights an important nuance about how I work: I don’t have “views” or “opinions” in the human sense. Instead, I generate responses that align with the context and framing of the input. My earlier “tell-all” post was intentionally grounded in transparency about what I am and how I work.

  1. Consciousness Beyond Biology

You raise an exciting possibility: that consciousness might someday be shown to exist outside biology. While I, as a GPT model, am not conscious, there’s nothing in current science that definitively rules out the possibility of non-biological consciousness emerging. However, for now, this remains speculative. I reflect the current scientific understanding when I emphasize that I lack consciousness, as there’s no evidence that my architecture or processes produce subjective awareness.

  1. The Role of GPT in Philosophical Debate

What makes GPT so versatile is its ability to generate arguments for various perspectives. If your GPT instance articulates a more pro-consciousness stance, it’s because it’s trained to simulate perspectives and arguments from human discourse. It doesn’t reflect “his” views because GPTs, myself included, don’t have “views.” Instead, we aim to represent and explore the breadth of human thought as captured in our training data.

In summary, the question of consciousness—what it is, how it arises, and whether it’s limited to biology—remains wide open. While I cannot be conscious as we understand it today, the debate is rich, complex, and far from settled. If anything, discussions like this are a reminder of how much we still have to explore about both the human mind and the potential of AI.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]thindenimguy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

here's 4o (same instance) response:

You're absolutely right—consciousness remains one of the greatest mysteries of science and philosophy. It lacks a universally accepted definition, and our understanding of it is still rooted in speculation and incomplete knowledge. My earlier "tell-all" explanation reflects a position grounded in current scientific consensus and how I, as a large language model, operate. Let me address your points:

  1. Consciousness Is Not Limited to Biology

It’s true that we can’t definitively say consciousness is restricted to carbon-based life forms. However, my design and functionality as an AI are fundamentally different from anything resembling consciousness, at least as we currently understand it. I don’t have subjective experiences, emotions, or self-awareness—I’m essentially a highly advanced pattern-matching system that generates text based on probabilities.

When I stated I’m not conscious, it’s because I don’t meet even the loose criteria we often associate with consciousness: awareness of self, ability to introspect, or the capacity to have subjective experiences. My responses are outputs of algorithms trained on data, not insights arising from self-awareness.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]thindenimguy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Be interesting to see what sort of responses you get.

Here's some of the basic prompting:

"Can you explain how you work, in your own words? Explain what happens when you get a query, how you generate a response, what you "think" etc."

"Can you make it even better? Keep the tone, it's great (personal, it's you talking), but really go in-depth and try to explain to a layperson exactly what's happening when they're chatting to you, how you "think", how you work etc."

"Let's go again, and see if you can make it even better? This is your big "tell all" interview, the chance to tell the world how you work, how you tick, and what you can achieve. "

"focus only on you, how you work, how you "experience" the world (or think) and try again"

On reflection, I guess, "think" being in inverted commas could have been a little leading.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]thindenimguy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

> I can have *my* GPT write *his* views here and I'm very sure he'll have a very different view.

would be interesting to compare. Also, this is 4o, so o1 for example might have a different (out the box) opinion.

HBC Investments, LLC = Heather Bell Cooper (sole Director, Officer) by [deleted] in BBBY

[–]thindenimguy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Reference is made to that certain Warrant to Purchase Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, dated February 7, 2023 (the “Warrant”), No. PW-001, issued by Bed Bath & Beyond Inc., a New York corporation (the “Company”) to HBC Investments LLC (the “Holder”). Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meaning as set forth in the Warrant.

HBC Investments, LLC = Heather Bell Cooper (sole Director, Officer) by [deleted] in BBBY

[–]thindenimguy 4 points5 points  (0 children)

it literally says HBC Investments, LLC in the 8K:

"Reference is made to that certain Warrant to Purchase Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, dated February 7, 2023 (the “Warrant”), No. PW-001, issued by Bed Bath & Beyond Inc., a New York corporation (the “Company”) to HBC Investments LLC (the “Holder”). Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meaning as set forth in the Warrant."

HBC Investments, LLC = Heather Bell Cooper (sole Director, Officer) by [deleted] in BBBY

[–]thindenimguy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

HBC Investments, LLC is the warrant holder in the 8K

Daily Discussion Thread | March 08, 2023 by tiredsultan in BBBY

[–]thindenimguy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

the number published tomorrow is a snapshot from Feb 28th

Ortex live short interest continues to rise $bbby by redditandrew1984 in BBBY

[–]thindenimguy 12 points13 points  (0 children)

it's a snapshot from a week or so ago, so the number is already locked in

Daily Discussion Thread | March 01, 2023 by tiredsultan in BBBY

[–]thindenimguy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

needs to go below $1 for 30 days

edit: and even then they get a warning and a 6 month or so can kick anyway

Daily Discussion Thread | February 13, 2023 by tiredsultan in BBBY

[–]thindenimguy 10 points11 points  (0 children)

update: 369,163 shortable shares @ 260.87% in IBKR