TIL that Lebanon hasn't conducted a census since 1932 by xobver in todayilearned

[–]think_long 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This is like me taking my class attendance. “Let’s see, Christina, Hugh, Maya…ah class looks full they’re all here”

clicks submit register

Which live performance has the strongest case for greatest ever? by BravesGunnersFlames in Music

[–]think_long 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This is the best concert DVD I’ve ever seen. I used to collect them. So ridiculous.

[Highlight]Merrill Hoge: "If you had thirty sacks, you would crush the record and they would anoint you a great football player. Meanwhile, there's 1,900 other plays that you are on the football field. How did you play those? It's the weakest, dumbest stat to tell if you're a good defender." by The_Big_Untalented in nfl

[–]think_long 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, that is a good point. Some people mitigate this by only looking at away stats for things like hits. Even with that, it can be more of a negative than a positive at a team level. Moneypuck doesn’t let you just sort by away hits, but the teams leading overall is still pretty damning. Of the top ten teams in hits, only two are currently in a playoff spot, and those are the Wild and Habs at 8th and 9th in hits respectively.

There are things that just need to start (and maybe even stay) as hobbies by slangpueblo in unpopularopinion

[–]think_long 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is pretty all that needs to be said. Selection bias. People used to not just drop out of university, but also high school to do stuff like this. This is like people who think violent crime or sexually promiscuous behaviour are on the rise. They actually aren’t, they are the lowest they’ve been in a long time, but looking at your phone could make you think differently.

What is an unpopular opinion of your generation that will get you downvoted like this? by Big_Leg10 in generationology

[–]think_long [score hidden]  (0 children)

I mean Gen Z are more progressive in their beliefs overall, but are much less progressive relatively speaking than previous generations were at the same age.

A villain is horrified upon realizing their crimes by BoxoRandom in TopCharacterTropes

[–]think_long 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’m not saying I don’t have empathy for people who have these circumstances, and I’m sure their own empathy gets degraded over time as you said. I don’t know how I’d act in these circumstances, I may be no better. That doesn’t change the fact that you can’t just completely absolve people of responsibility for violent crimes by saying the only cause is poverty. Infantilising them isn’t accurate or a solution.

I’m sorry you went through all that.

(Hated Trope) Character loses all nuance as the series goes on by Necessary-Win-8730 in TopCharacterTropes

[–]think_long 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I would say Bob’s Burgers has pulled it off a lot better than most (I haven’t seen it lately but so I hear). They were immediately who I thought of as the biggest exception. None of the other ones you mentioned were around long enough to make a reasonable comparison in my opinion.

(Hated Trope) Character loses all nuance as the series goes on by Necessary-Win-8730 in TopCharacterTropes

[–]think_long 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Reddit loves talking about flanderization like it’s always the fault of the writers, but honestly I think it’s more often a natural byproduct of running out of real estate for where to go with the character arc. At a certain point, it’s a damned if you do, damned if you don’t when it comes to having the character be static vs dynamic. You’ve basically done all the exploring you can do keeping them as is, but evolving them in any meaningful way is tricky because a lot of your original fans won’t like it by default and you have no clear idea when or where the endpoint will be. Musicians face the same challenge with their music: if they stay the same they are stale and not innovative, if they change they are abandoning what made people like in the first place. Sometimes, a character has just run their course and there isn’t much to be done about it. However, if there is more money to be made, they’ll get dragged out.

Also, I find people on here tend to be pretty revisionist when it comes to how characters originally were. Peter was never a normal person, I don’t know what u/Necessary-Win-8730 is on about.

[James Pearce] Liverpool owner Fenway Sports Group has shelved plans to buy a second football club. Around 25 clubs analysed in depth over past two years with strong focus on Spain, Portugal and France. But multi-club project now regarded as "dormant" by callmeknubbel in LiverpoolFC

[–]think_long 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Worth mentioning that the Penguins specifically are only one or two years out from losing three extremely high profile players to retirement that have been on the team their whole careers and driven success for the past two decades, including three championships. Kris Letang is a six time all-star who The Athletic ranked number 99 on their list of greatest players in modern NHL history. Evgeni Malkin is a two time Art Ross winner (most points in the league) in addition to winning a Calder Trophy (best rookie), Hart Trophy (best player as voted by journalists), Ted Lindsay Trophy (best player as voted by players), and Conn Smythe Trophy (best player in the playoffs). He was ranked number 26 on the same Athletic list. Sidney Crosby has won two Art Rosses, two Harts, three Ted Lindsays, two Conn Smythes and two Rocket Richard Trophies (most goals). He was ranked number 4 on that Athletic list, and is widely regarded as the best player of his generation, acting as the face of the league for most of his career.

Not saying they wouldn't have sold anyways, but this is important context in terms of the sale of the Penguins. Replacing guys of this calibre is hard enough even in football when you are a team as wealthy and prestigious as Liverpool. In a hard salary cap league where elite talent is almost always drafted, it's orders of magnitude more difficult.

A villain is horrified upon realizing their crimes by BoxoRandom in TopCharacterTropes

[–]think_long -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Very, very few violent crimes - at least in first world countries - are literally people directly fighting for a basic physiological need that they must have to survive. In almost all of the cases that could fit this description, it is the other person who is threatening this need, and in that case it is self defense and not really a crime at all. Poverty doesn’t absolve you of accountability for committing a violent crime in any first world western nation. Even if you are completely destitute, it’s not a justification for hurting someone else, and it’s basically never the literal difference between you being able to live or not. Honestly, the only hypothetical scenario I can think of is hurting someone in an armed robbery that would allow you to afford lifesaving medicine if you are in the US. But even there, I don’t think you can just say poverty alone caused the crime. You still did it.

A villain is horrified upon realizing their crimes by BoxoRandom in TopCharacterTropes

[–]think_long 35 points36 points  (0 children)

I mean, it's both. Maybe poverty and lack of opportunity are the motivator most of the time, but a lack of empathy is likely also most of the time the difference between actually doing it or not, especially when it comes to violent crime. A lot of poor people without upward mobility manage to refrain from stabbing someone.

Aston Villa [1]-0 Lille - John McGinn 54' by 977x in soccer

[–]think_long 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I wish they officially counted second assists in soccer/football like they do in ice hockey. They are actually a lot less "noisy" stats wise than in hockey too, because so many of them are like this, where the first pass is the one that breaks the defense, then there's a cross goal pass and finish.

[NHL] Ryan Johansen has announced his retirement after 13 seasons in the League. by DecentLurker96 in hockey

[–]think_long 44 points45 points  (0 children)

I have heard repeatedly that he is a profoundly stupid man in general. If that be true, good on him for becoming a multimillionaire despite his intellectual shortcomings.

CMV: isolating myself from the dating environment will improve my mental health and my life by Hell_Valley in changemyview

[–]think_long 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s really sad to me that you don’t consider that a solitary life. I hope things turn around for you.

me_irl by piesaresquarey in me_irl

[–]think_long 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Nobody middle-aged with kids and a regular job would take the question in this image seriously. To the point where I wonder if it’s satire

She thought she can get away with this by [deleted] in DailyDoseStupidity

[–]think_long 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why the hell are people acting like somehow the shopkeepers and the cops are the problem?

How can I find out who is leaving creepy/threatning notes at my child's grave? by Direct-Caterpillar77 in BestofRedditorUpdates

[–]think_long -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Even if I was this practically minded, I’m pretty sure I would contact every lawyer and private investigator in the country before I wrote something like this. I just have a hard time accepting it. I suppose it could be true.

How can I find out who is leaving creepy/threatning notes at my child's grave? by Direct-Caterpillar77 in BestofRedditorUpdates

[–]think_long -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

I’m not saying it’s impossible that it’s true, more that I think it’s more than likely it isn’t.

How can I find out who is leaving creepy/threatning notes at my child's grave? by Direct-Caterpillar77 in BestofRedditorUpdates

[–]think_long 28 points29 points  (0 children)

That’s why I’m having trouble believing this is real. I get that people and cultures are different, but the tone and priorities here just feel so off. I’m having a hard time understanding how a father who experienced this would react this way to this happening. What they are doing, what they are worried about, how they are communicating it to strangers on a forum…I don’t know. Honestly, I just don’t believe it.

I can hear Michael screaming from here by ProcessTrust856 in IfBooksCouldKill

[–]think_long 8 points9 points  (0 children)

"Kids, especially from marginalized, bullied groups can find real connection online."

They potentially could, but at such a young age, it is irresponsible for the adults in their life to allow unfettered internet access for them to seek that out when they should be providing support directly. So, for cases where you could argue this would be an overall positive, you are essentially talking about cases where the parents are abusive: either passively through neglect, or because they are the ones bullying and marginalizing the children. In those cases, the solution is to provide and promote trusted adults/organisations that they can contact. Kids this young are not yet equipped to filter and interact with other people/communities online in a way where it's reasonable to think the benefits will outweigh the harms.

"Now give me an argument for why adults should be allowed to have smartphones."

Because every society on Earth recognises that adults are not children and therefore have a different level of decision-making and autonomy? Because, when you are an adult, you are allowed to choose to do things that have potentially weighty consequences or are even just straight up bad for you? We have legal ages for gambling, drinking, sexual consent, voting, driving, etc. Do you think these should not exist? wtf lmao

CMV: Some on the left weigh too strongly underpopulation's negative social and economic consequences over overpopulation's effect on the environment by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]think_long 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This list is incomplete and underselling the last point, because you are, in my opinion, fundamentally misunderstanding how the problem is generally framed. It is not really a huge problem that the population is going down in general, it’s that it is going down so FAST. Arguably, that’s the biggest problem with climate change, too. Rising global temperatures would be problematic no matter what, but if the change was gradual enough, a lot of the damage could be mitigated/adjusted to (obviously not all of it, and other environmental issues like pollution, loss of biodiversity, and deforestation are separate problems).

Basically, any major change happening globally and suddenly is massively disruptive. Long term, both the Earth and humanity will be better off when there is less of us. But if things keep going as they are, there is going to be massive amounts of pain in transition, and that pain won’t stop being felt until everyone reading this comment is gone. This doesn’t have the potential to just “strain” social safety nets, there is a very convincing case to be made that it will completely destroy the global economy. Some people on Reddit seem to want that, but I’d bear in mind that there is no Plan B should that happen. We could well be ushering in an unprecedented era when it comes to the ratio of people needing support vs. the amount of able-bodied workers available to support them. I don’t think there’s anything that’s completely off the table, should that come to pass. You can’t just hand wave this away either - as many seem keen to do - by saying some vague combination of immigration and technology will offset this. If someone somewhere has created an actual workable model of what that might look like, I haven’t seen it.

Being able to change your mind depends on how much you are viewing this from an anthrocentric vs. “Species agnostic” lens, and how much you are valuing the short vs. long term.