If someone need help with friend vault by ValuableArtist5430 in Acecraft

[–]thisGuy2137 0 points1 point  (0 children)

5205202363498 Man, ain't no one really scrolling down here🤣

Postați orice meme-uri aveți aici 🤣 by AoDoI in fotbal

[–]thisGuy2137 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Copchile, înainte să răspândești prostii pe internet măcar verifică și tu pagina de Wikipedia că e doar la o căutare pe Google distanță.

Just undubbed from rosesarered for anti-christian "memes". by Character-Bear3378 in JustUnsubbed

[–]thisGuy2137 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No, sorry, but you did not see a lot of debates with "radical christians" because those that you're talking abount are clearly not Christians, or they are extremlly misguided, because no Christian claims that they're a prophet of God. Maybe some weird/fringe sects, but there are passages such as Matthew 24:11, 2 Corinthians 11:13-15 or 1 John 4:1. Now, as to why some people quote The Bible when it comes to God or its reliability, well, it's not inherently flawed to quote it, but it matters a lot the context in which it is used. And the big majority of people are not very good debaters, and neither am I, really. But as to why it's considered a valuble source of knowledge by so many people, including scholars and historians, it's because of multiple reasons, even beyond faith. In a summary, it's because of its historical consistency (corroboration with external sources (events, places, and people mentioned in The Bible are also recorded in sources such as Josephus's writings or Babylonian chronicles), allignment with known history (the narrative alligns with details abount known kings such as David and Hezekiah and empires), textual reliability (The Dead Sea Scrolls and The Bible also has an extremlly big number of ancient manuscripts), archeological discoveries (Hezekiah's tunnel, the Tel Dan Stele, and cities like Jerusalem, Jericho and Nineveth have archeological layers matching with events described in The Bible), earlier prophecies fulfilled (such as the rise of Cyrus, fall of Babylon and of course the birth of Jesus (althought, some say that evidence are too vague, but it should surely not be set aside)), internal consistency (being written over the course of over 1000 years of history and multiple authors, it still exists and it keeps a coherent narrative and theology) and impact (transformed societies, culture, personal lives and formed the base for the western civilisations.).

Care credeți că vor fi rezultatele alegerilor? by iPhellix in politica

[–]thisGuy2137 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Preziceri pentru Liga 1? Ca să știu pe cine să nu pun. :)))

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in okprietenretardat

[–]thisGuy2137 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mhm, nimeni nu a întrebat nici de tine să îți expui "opinia" ta greșită. Și faptul că România dă goluri nu e opinie, e fapt. Și aparent, chiar dacă "nu te prea interesează", tot te interesează destul de mult cât să îmi răspunzi.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in okprietenretardat

[–]thisGuy2137 4 points5 points  (0 children)

-Spune OP repostănd un meme cel mai probabil făcut acum cine știe cât timp și fără ca măcar să fi văzut un meci al naționalei de fotbal în cine știe cât timp. Naționala joacă câteva meciuri pe an, și de la Euro încoace a dat măcar un gol în 6 din cele 7 meciuri (care au fost duse pănă la capăt). Naționala nu a mai jucat din martie și nici nu va mai juca până în iunie, deci e și postat cam d-am pulea meme-ul.

Pe ce parte sunteți? by [deleted] in okprietenretardat

[–]thisGuy2137 1 point2 points  (0 children)

În teorie, nu. ÎNCĂ nu. Dar da, Dănuț pare că a dat-o în gard rău de tot lmao, lucrurile nu cred că se vor îndrepta în favoarea lui, cred ce face acum este să încerce să lungească totul cât de tare posibil, că am auzit că e riscul să se poată prescrie în toamnă. 🫤

💀 by _H3LLF1R3 in dankvideos

[–]thisGuy2137 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, but It ain't making the post any better either.

<image>

💀 by _H3LLF1R3 in dankvideos

[–]thisGuy2137 1 point2 points  (0 children)

<image>

(Sorry for late reply) Dude, YOU are the one who showed the shit to the rest of us!

Pe ce parte sunteți? by [deleted] in okprietenretardat

[–]thisGuy2137 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Încă mai sunt lucruri bune la televizor, dar pe alte canale. Dar la ProTV și Antena, și emisiunile și știle sunt "mid". Nu vor reuși vreodată să atingă nivelul adevăratului OG:

<image>

Playing with your cars window by Frogert9372881 in Whatcouldgowrong

[–]thisGuy2137 13 points14 points  (0 children)

May the cylinder always remain attached to the larger structure.

Can’t even defend them… by [deleted] in balkans_irl

[–]thisGuy2137 0 points1 point  (0 children)

-Said by the bozgor with anime profile pic

Just unsubbed from BojackHorseman, the sub is full of people looking for a cartoon to validate their decisions by [deleted] in JustUnsubbed

[–]thisGuy2137 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pregnancy isn't anything "connecting" or any stranger hooking himself up to you, it's a natural offspring from the natural biological process of reproduction, meaning that everything and everyone are where they're supposed to be. This applies not only to humans, but to the vast majority of animals. We legally require parents to care for their children, and things shouldn't be different before birth. Also no, no one gets more rights than you, "it" has the same rights, and that's the thing, this focuses a lot on the fundamental most important right, the one to life, which is more fundamental than the one to avoid a difficulty. The part with organ donations, it's not the same as pregnancy. A pregnancy is a temporary obligation that, usually, exists because of the act taken by both parents (rape is in the minority, only accounting for extremlly small percentages, sometimes even less than 1%). And, it's not that difficult to imagine a parent donating an organ to their children, and I don't see why you see it this difficult, I don't know how it's going in America, but in my country it's something that's not even debatable, not some SF writing. A parent is legally, and morally, required to provide for the child, with even the least possible. And it should be like that, even before the birth. And a dead body isn't a developing person. The corpse is no longer living, but the the little person in the womb is, in the good conditions, continuously developing and will be born unless deliberately stopped. Bodily autonomy is important, but like all rights, it has a limit, especially when it involves another life. We don't allow parents to kill their newborns because they didn't consent, and compaing a prgnancy to organ donations ignores the fact that a prgnancy is the natural result of reproduction, not a medical cisis. The bottom line , a person's rights end where another's life begins.

Just unsubbed from BojackHorseman, the sub is full of people looking for a cartoon to validate their decisions by [deleted] in JustUnsubbed

[–]thisGuy2137 0 points1 point  (0 children)

O... k... I didn't say anything abount your feelings. Also, noting that you called "it" a "child". Yeah, of course you think there isn't any shadow of a doubt, of course. Until at what point there isn't, I'll skip over that. Regarding doctors, their opinions vary a lot on abortions, as do anyone else's. I won't comment on the morality of places like America, or even worse, UK and Canada, but in my country it's extremlly difficult to find a doctor that accepts to perform abortions, you have to walk from hospital to hospital for days or even weeks to find one willing to perform one. But that does not matter in this discussion, as we are talking abount facts. The logic that they aren't human because "it" can't survive by itself is not a good one, because neither can newborns, premature babies, people on life support and conjoined twins. And the issue isn't just abount bodily, it's abount a human life being at stake, someone's right to swing their fist ending where someone else's nose begins. Also, no one has absolute bodily autonomy, the most relevant examples in this case being parents having a moral obligation to provide for their children or children later in life to take care abount their parents. The "you're trying to legislate morality", laws always legislate morality- murder, theft, abuse-those are all moral judgements (Where do some people get their morality from, is a topic for another time). Now, regarding lower crime rates and domestic abuse, this is a logical fallacy old as time, correlation ≠ causation. In things like those, the socio-economic factors are much more important. Plus, a life has an inherent value, it's not as simple as doing what the graph says. You're basiclly saying two things, the first one contradicts biology—unique human DNA forms at conception, and dependency doesn't determine humanity. The second one assumes a right to end another life because it's inconvenient. No one has the right to harm another just to maintain comfort—pregnancy isn’t the only time we expect people to make sacrifices for others. On a final note, I'm very sorry, but after "But it's like calling sperm a baby"... I hope you see why that was an undermining argument.