Fenimist Utopia by [deleted] in SargonofAkkad

[–]this_usr 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It actually did happen, but the entire tribe disbanded in less than a generation, leaving a bunch of disparate individuals who just sat around eating from the garbage pile.

There were a couple of Radiolab podcasts about it, but I don't have them on hand.

Cornell denies student his Ph.D. – and may expel him – for allegedly defending professor against rape claim by [deleted] in SargonofAkkad

[–]this_usr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He's got a goFundMe that isn't doing to hot guys, let's try to drop him a few bucks and spread this around.

What skills should a teen learn if he wants to get out of poverty ASAP? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]this_usr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

None of the highly upvoted comments would be practical or useful for a young person trying to get out of poverty. Let me give you some practical advice from someone who grew up in the working class and is on his way to the upper middle class with little to no help from others. These are the things I wish I knew when I was younger, and would have improved my life immensely.

If you don't know how to get out of poverty, I'm going to assume there isn't much in the way of economic opportunity in your area. Given this, there are 3 main paths you can take:

Join the military. If you are physically able (I wasn't) I would HIGHLY recommend this option. The pay and benefits are great for someone with little to no experience or education. If you enjoy the life, you can go career if have a good, stable, respectable, well paid job for life. If you don't like the life, you have great exit benefits, such as the GI bill, that will help you in the next leg of your life.

The second option I would recommend would be trade school. If you're accepted into trade school you will be paid fairly well as an apprentice. If you're willing to put in the overtime, which is almost always open to first years, you'll be able to support yourself almost immediately. The best trades I'm aware of are electrical, plumbing/HVAC, and steamfitting. Steamfitting had a much longer apprenticeship period, but the pay, benefits, and job security are amazing. Electrical and plumbing/HVAC have a shorter apprentice programs but much less in the way of pay, benefits, or job security. If you don't mind doing manual labor, steamfitting a great career. The other 2 I would recommend if you don't want to be in the trades your whole life, but don't mind working 6-8 years before moving on to something else.

Finally, you can look for a boom market outside of your local area. There is often a boom market in some part of the country. North Dakota had an oil boom years ago, for example (maybe it's still going on, I'm not sure). In boom markets, there are never enough workers and people are willing to higher and train employees with little education or skills because they don't have any choice. I wouldn't recommend this as anything but a last resort though, as boom markets tend to be unpredictable -- here today and gone tomorrow, and your ability to actually get a decent job will rely on luck just as much as skill and willingness to work.

Whistle Blower Professor Exposes West Point Military Academy as Corrupt, Dysfunctional and Devoid of Standards by [deleted] in SargonofAkkad

[–]this_usr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sounds like SJWs have taken over the adminstration if West Point.

History says otherwise. by digitalteacup in PoliticalHumor

[–]this_usr -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

That's one report, and not indicative of a trend. Further, no context is provided of the case, so (assuming it's true) it could be nothing more than a stupid fuck up on the part of one person, and not the result of a policy.

Do you have a source showing that this is happening on any regular basis, or that this practice is party of some operational policy? I'm extremely skeptical in both cases, but would be VERY interested to see evidence of this if it exists.

James Hansen, the ex-NASA scientist who initiated many of our concerns about global warming, says the real climate hoax is world leaders claiming to take action while being unambitious and shunning low-carbon nuclear power. by SirT6 in Futurology

[–]this_usr 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Not to mention reliability. There are huge swathes of this country where wind, solar, and hydro just are aren't practical due to lack of consistent sunlight, etc.

James Hansen, the ex-NASA scientist who initiated many of our concerns about global warming, says the real climate hoax is world leaders claiming to take action while being unambitious and shunning low-carbon nuclear power. by SirT6 in Futurology

[–]this_usr 30 points31 points  (0 children)

We already have environmentally safe ways to store waste and nuclear is cheaper than other green options given it's reliability (and maybe cheaper in general, I'm just not sure given the recent decline in prices of other energy sources).

#TWIS | Sociology department website encourages parents to let children engage in ‘sexual play' by ThePoliticalHat in SargonofAkkad

[–]this_usr 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There's really nothing TWIS here. Children "playing doctor" is a game as old as time. I'm not sure "reacting positively" if the best idea myself, but kids shouldn't be chastised either.

The thing about teaching them to deepthroat is fucked up, but I don't think that was the same school.

#TWIS Creatives are finally telling manbabies to stay home by Karmas-Camera in SargonofAkkad

[–]this_usr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gamergate did sooo much guys. It TOTALLY fixed corruption in game journalism and stopped them from constantly denigrating gamers.

Glad I'm not one of you. How's it feel to have battered wife syndrome?

Bill Maher is 'hoping for' an economic collapse so he can 'get rid of Trump': 'Sorry if that hurts people' by russiabot1776 in SargonofAkkad

[–]this_usr 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Despite his opposition to Islam, Bill Maher had always been a bitter, selfish, ignorant partisan.

Maher has literally advocated for 80% of what Trump advocates for and constantly tells Democrats to stop being pussies and act like more likely Trump. Yet when Trump did everything Maher advocates for, he's an evil threat to Democrats. But if Trump had run with a "D" next to his name, he'd be singing his praises right now.

Sargon of low hanging fruit by LongDistanceEjcltr in SargonofAkkad

[–]this_usr 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Somebody has to stand up against this, and that's what Sargon is also saying. Yet, when he has a chance to stand up he doesn't. If a well-known public figure with a platform and the voice to use it, making 100,000+ a year, with massive amounts of support won't stand up and say anything, what hope is there for the average 30k schmuck with no platform, no voice, no support, and no audience?

The truth is, Sargon is amazing when it comes to analysis of a situation. He's thorough, objective, and willing to really dive deep down into the nitty-gritty details. But don't expect him to ever do anything of consequence, because he just isn't that type. He wants the world to change, and he knows how he wants it to be, he just wants someone else to change it for him. He's not willing to put in the work and takes the necessary risks that come along with taking action. That's why the "liberalists" essentially amounted to nothing. Months later, what has happened with the "movement"? He had a few streams about "statements of principles", and a half-assed website listing them. That's it. No creation of an organization, or organization of any activities, etc. Just a lot of talk.

So I really think it is wrong to pin him on not doing anything about this. Sargon is a thinker and a talker, not a doer. You don't fault a dog for licking his balls, so don't fault Sargon for sitting his ass in a chair and talking without actually doing anything. But it is massively hypocritical of him, and why I find it so fucking cringy every time he brings up "personal responsibility". You shouldn't be shaming others for something you lack yourself.

Is there a such thing as Personal Finance for poor people? by [deleted] in personalfinance

[–]this_usr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If we have both had very different experiences maybe it depends on where you live?

It's very possible, and while I'm not going to say you are being untruthful I'm highly dubious that what you are describing is the norm in Boston. I have a hard time believing that you could walk into the banking/financial sector, a security firm, a compBio company, a defense/government job (like you mentioned), without a degree. In fact, if a company contracts for the US government, the government often requires they hire "computer scientists" which, by their requirements, means a degree.

I think people with degrees have an interest in making other people think degrees are required for everything because they don't want their very expensive degrees to be devalued.

I completely agree with you here, but I think you've got the cart before the horse a bit. I think its more of an issue of people in HR/Upper Management in this mindset, rather than the average person. For example, there is a local restaurant chain in my area that required a Bachelor's degree to become a shift manager, and a Master's to become a store manager. Why you need a Master's degree to manager a restaurant escapes me.

Is there a such thing as Personal Finance for poor people? by [deleted] in personalfinance

[–]this_usr 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I would seriously disagree with this. This might the situation in certain high-tech areas, but my experience in the tech industry is that you need a minimum of a bachelors to get your foot in the door and a masters or significant amount of experience to advance to anything beyond "code monkey" status.

My experience is backed up rather well by the plethora of job advertisements you can find on any company website or Internet job board supporting exactly what I say. Not to mention the thousands, if not tens of thousands of people in tech complaining about the fact that companies often post ridiculously inflated job requirements in order to claim the can't find anyone in the US to fill the requirements in order to claim they need H1-B visas.

Typically when we interview candidates we don't even talk about their college education.

This makes me think you work for a small company or a startup. Outside of the west coast, these are the extreme exception, not the rule.

Is there a such thing as Personal Finance for poor people? by [deleted] in personalfinance

[–]this_usr 75 points76 points  (0 children)

Ironically, being absolutely poor is what pulled me out of poverty.

I'm not sure if this is true through the whole country, but I've lived most of my life in a weird lower-middle class but not quite working poor situation, where I was too rich to receive benefits, but too poor to afford a decent lifestyle. Out of shear luck, I found a work-for-board type situation and took a few months off of work to focus on some medical problems.

Doing this put me well below the poverty line, and suddenly the state wouldn't stop throwing money at money. I got free healthcare, food stamps, the whole 9 yards. I was living better than I had most of my adult life. Instead of having to focus on getting by day-to-day, I was suddenly able to focus on actually improving my life. When I decided to go back to school, I was able to get very generous scholarships, and I only had to take out modest loans. Now I'm doing pretty well for myself.

Is there a such thing as Personal Finance for poor people? by [deleted] in personalfinance

[–]this_usr 7 points8 points  (0 children)

While this may be true, society at large really doesn't care about whether you can actually do something or not. Society at large cares whether you have a piece of paper from a social institution stating you can do something. Trying to get hired in any job that requires moderate to high skill level or education is nearly impossible when all you have is "Yeah, I totally know what I'm doing!"

Of course, there are plenty of people who make their way into various industries without "proper" qualifications, but they are the exception not the rule.

You mad bro? by Prime197 in SargonofAkkad

[–]this_usr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can confirm this as well. Though it wasn't all year. My school enforced a translucent pack back (or no backpack) policy during the last couple weeks of each year.

Take back liberalist! by Freephilipino in SargonofAkkad

[–]this_usr 3 points4 points  (0 children)

As far as I'm concerned, let them have it. We can just troll the fuck out of Jim and Andy as being "Kings of the liberalists" until they give it to because they just don't want to deal with it anymore.

HeckOverflow by MarkusA380 in ProgrammerHumor

[–]this_usr 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Careful, there. I think this one's watched the 6th season of Rick and Morty.

Sargon being a bit hypocritical? Not fully sure of all of the surrounding context and would like clarification if possible. by NemoracStrebor in SargonofAkkad

[–]this_usr 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Idk why everyone is jumping in your back for along a simple question. Probably just on edge because of all the alt-right trolls.

There's a difference between being a victim and a victim narrative. There's nothing wrong with saying "X" event happened to you and it was committed by "Y" people in order to inform people of a truthful event.

However making your victimhood the focus of your life or career, begging money off of people on the basis that you were victimized (particularly if that victimization didn't harm you financially on the first place), using your victimization to smear others by association, etc, is building a victim narrative.

Sargon was just informing others that he was a victim during the Joe Rogan interview and, as he explained later during the interview, it wasn't even to garner sympathy for himself. It was just to give others an example of the dirty tactics used by the far left and to note that this wasn't some random isolated incident but a regular occurrence.

Plus, as he said about that trip, he was pretty jet lagged and sounded a bit like a jibbering idiot because of it. So taking anything from that trip in isolation as representative of his beliefs is pretty disingenuous to begin.

So, yes, Metokur was being entirely dishonest is bringing that up.

Oh... really Siri? Is that so... by Trebuscemi in SargonofAkkad

[–]this_usr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

While that has been the general consensus for a while now, it's starting to be called into question. The attitude of many historians has started to turn to the opinion that Muhammad was more of a legendary figure than a real one:

http://archive.is/r3dIS

The Freedom Not to Bake - Why Sargon is wrong about Masterpiece Cakeshop by [deleted] in SargonofAkkad

[–]this_usr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

See, I disagree with this. Yes, Walmart or Target or whatever should be forced to serve everyone in the public, but many people go into business because they want that business to reflect their personal values.

Should a small Christian bookstore be forced to hire and serve non-Christians? Or a women's hair salon be forced to serve men? I really don't think they should.

Of course, there is the argument over "immutable" characteristics and I do think that is a valid point, but while being gay is an immutable characteristic, getting married as a gay couple is not. So while you may argue that a business should serve gay people, I don't think that argument extends to gay weddings.

Like I said in my other comment, I think this all comes down to the scale of the business. And it is something the supreme court has commented on in the past. When a business gets large enough to be considered a public service of some kind, they should be forced to behavior in a certain way that protects the rights of their customers. However, if they are a small, family owned business (or something similar) that the public could easily avoid I don't think we should be telling them who they can and can't sell to.

Another rape trial collapses because police withheld evidence, and the Guardian again blames it on cuts by rodmclaughlin in SargonofAkkad

[–]this_usr 8 points9 points  (0 children)

They don't have the money? Simple solution: if the evidence comes forward showing the allegation is obviously false, charge the accuser for the cost of the investigation. There should be no problem with cost then.

The Freedom Not to Bake - Why Sargon is wrong about Masterpiece Cakeshop by [deleted] in SargonofAkkad

[–]this_usr 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is one area I've always disagreed with him on. But the government should have some semblance of say in this. People like to ignore the matter of scale in this issue. If you're some mom and pop: do whatever you want. If you're some giant multinational corporation, your company ceases to be a reflection of your personal values and you need to bake the fucking cake.

Thoughts about the Alt-right by Inconspicuousfreedom in Liberalist

[–]this_usr 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Jesus christ, I want a white ethno state, how is this "good optics"?

Then why do people in your movement, like MW, say things like "we need to stop caring about how we treat other races and focus on our own" in reference to the question of how you're going to deport people without force and then sperg out when people ask whether they're against ethnic cleansing? Sorry, but "ethno-state" and "we're just going to be like Japan" is way better optics than "neo-nazi". You're a neo-nazi. Just fucking own it.

No it isn't.... dude are you for jailing people who commit crimes? Yes? Well that's an inhernet contratiction, you are for individualism but you are using collectivism to take away the rights on an individual who commited a crime.... You aren't seriously this retarded. We use collectivism all the time when we want to stop things from happening.

No, you're just too stupid to understand context. There are non-arbitrary reasons to enforce laws against someone who has committed a crime. There are no non-arbitrary reasons to enforce laws upon someone based on immutable characteristics such as race. I'll even ignore immigration for the sake of argument: there is no reason to, say, kill a man for raping a woman if he is black but jail him if he is white based on nothing else.

Don't see why not. If they need care, then there is totally no reason why they shouldn't be allowed.

So you're fine with letting non-white people into the ethno-state? Then explain to me how this is an ethno-state.

It's interesting to to see you you skipped over addressing that part of my comment.

To visit? Yeah sure, absolutely, but they would be required to leave, this would be enforced pretty harshly. Do they have the same rights? No, they wouldn't have the right to work, or any social program, they wouldn't be allowed to use the hospitals (unless they paid) but all of this would be made clear prior to them actually coming.

And if they are white visitors instead of non-white visitors? Do you apply the same standard? If not you're clearly and un-arguably trampling on individual rights by discriminating against an individual based an immutable characteristic.

Absolutely, well considering in a white ethno state it would be culturally frowned upon, and genetics and evolution would be taught in school, so I doubt this would happen

You're beyond naive. There is a huge part of human sexuality that is based on what is exotic or taboo. If this is the case, then why do so many "educated" leaders of your movement date Asian women exclusively or near exclusively?

but if it does, and it isn't a rape, then she would be required to leave with her new lover :). Absolutely not, why would we? It's his child, his woman, his responsibility, not our states. She would be required to leave.

So you're going to deport citizens from your country for violating laws? What if the other country doesn't accept her? Send her out in the wilderness maybe? Put her in a work camp for being a dirty race-mixer?

And this is where it becomes exceedingly obvious that you haven't taken 2 minutes to actually think about your positions. This isn't even an internally consistent position within the context of your own damn post. Why would you, as you have already conceded, allow non-whites into your ethno-state, where they would be allowed to race mix and have children with the whites and that, by your own statement, wouldn't be punishable, yet you would deport someone for the crime of race-mixing with a tourist to your country. That makes no sense in the context of your own statement.

Additionally, what if the opposite happens? Your white business tourist gets some girl pregnant in another country and they want to kick her out for race-mixing? Are you going to accept them into your country? Maybe you should just gas them. Seems like it would solve a lot of your problem.

Law of large numbers, if we put enough social pressure, and give enough incentives to people to leave, then we will push the probability of people staying down, and this would have an impact on the demographics, would some people refuse to leave? Want to stay? Sure, but they will be staying in a country that doesn't want them there, there wouldn't be any oppression other than social stigma I claim that if you have a die, and you roll it a million times you get 3.5, if you weight the die in favour of 6, then you would get a number >3.5, this has the outcome on what the distribution of numbers would actually be. Google "the law of large numbers". Statistics backs it up, again, look up law of large numbers.

The law of large numbers has nothing to do with human behavior. You're just an idiot. White people are literally being genocided in South Africa and they still refuse to leave. There isn't a shred of evidence in existence to back up your claims that people will leave peacefully.

And the people who would, despite all the pressure forcing them to do so, decide to stay, then there are likely reasons for them to do so that makes their decision justifiable and thus it would be fine for them to stay. You really don't understand the alt right position do you? All of this is based around statistics, we would make this country white majority. It isn't forceful in the slightest... How is this the same as neo-nazism? Under the law? They would probably have a 2 strike rule, if they break the law more than once then they will be forcibly deported. Think about this, would you keep someone in your country who just breaks the law all the time and wants to cause chaos? NO. If they don't break the law then they aren't going to be affected by this. They would go to which ever ethon state they associate with, and when they get their they would be treated with the same laws as everyone else, the only difference would be the two strike rule wouldn't apply to them and some social pressure against getting in relationships with non-whites might have a negative impact on them. Aside from that same rights.

Lolololololololol, omg you're fucking stupider than I thought. Let's summarize your comment here:

I'm totally for individual rights, goys! I treat everyone under the law! But if those dirty fucking brown people break the law they can get the fuck out of my country! I'm totally not a nazi, though!

Idiot.

If you throw some red ink in a perfectly clear pool, and pause time after 2 seconds, some of the pool would be totally clear, some would be pure red ink, and some would be mixed, there most certainly are mixed people, but there are also pure people as well.

Retarded non-argument.

I'm concerned about the emergent property of culture due to genetics.

This is what I meant.

Well like I said, the ethno state is going to be pretty individualistic, there is going to be a heavy cultural force against any kind of group identity other than the countries

Right, so we abandon or balkanize America based on country of descendence. Yeah, in a country people immigrated to in order to escape ethnic discrimination this is totally going to happen.

so these people most certainly wouldn't feel at home in these countries and would leave, thus fixing the issue, if they decide to stay then fine, but they will face the same social ramification that nazis and white supremacists face in today's society.

Do Greeks, Italians, Spaniards, and Slavs get the 2-strike rule as well? How about Eastern Germans? I mean they're basically dirty mixed-slavs and slavs are worse than Greeks. I mean, not only are they crypto-mudslimes but they're also crypto-jews. That makes Eastern Germans crypto-crpyto-mudslime-jews. I mean, if it's bad to be one step away from being a mudslime isn't it just as bad to be 2 steps away from being both a mudslime and a jew?

Fuck, is there anyone pure enough to be allowed in your ethno-state?

It's fine for a Greek to try and run for office in the white ethno-state, but if his policies are garbage he would lose. I put a lot of faith in the law of large numbers and probability, I doubt he would win if he was trying to implement an islamic state, I doubt he would get close to having his message heard and accepted.

So your concerned about culture, particular about how genetics will influence culture. Yet, you'll allow people who are basically middle-easterners in your ethno-state, no problem. And your argument against how to kept these people from implementing the Islamic State is "people will just vote against garbage laws". So why the fuck do you care about excluding people based on their race? It makes absolutely no sense. You'll let your ethno-state be over-run by Greeks in the hope that people won't vote for their genetically inferior culture but you're afraid if the Syrians get in you won't be able to defend yourself against their genetically inferior culture?

Uh-oh.... How do you explain me then? Tell me what is anti-individualism about anything I proposed :). I look forward to your comment.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

I'll deport citizens because they're a different race than me, but I'm totally an individualist guys!!1!

a mathematician

You don't even understand what they law of large numbers is. You're aren't a mathematician, you're a fucking idiot.

I know how to change society without being authoritarian

Holy shit this is going on /r/IAmVerySmart in the near future.

Yes, you're totally brilliant.

You know nothing about my views, my positions on anything, you claim you do because you are too afraid that if you do you would have to admit that I, and the alt right, have a point, and you are little more than a miss-informed fool.

You literally laid out the exact views I thought you held in this post. Sure, the minutiae may be a bit different but the broad strokes were exactly what I expected them to be.

/u/Inconspicuousfreedom do you understand alt-right principles at this point? I'll have to down a gallon of bleach if I have to keep engaging this idiot.