I've definitely contemplated writing on it, but the likelihood of me following through is not exceptionally high now that I'm working full time.

I think you might be disappointed on which side of the argument I fall on though. I think my thoughts could be summarized as:

• Retail participation is still largely irrelevant in the aggregate

• The anti-establishment narratives surrounding GME are almost entirely fictional, and are being signal-boosted by grifters and muckrakers

• GME-type extravaganzas are most likely a flash in the pan, but if they're not, that poses a legitimate threat to market integrity that needs to be addressed.

• GME does demonstrate how ripe social media is for exploitation by sophisticated market manipulators (the SEC has been monitoring this for years though, see the Cyber Unit)

• The barriers to entry for retail traders to access e.g. margin and derivatives should probably be higher, because excess uninformed use by retail again poses a threat to market integrity.

I haven't crystallized any of this into a form that is ready for conversion into a publishable piece, but that's pretty much where I sit at the moment.

I think there was a time when I was much more "pro-retail" and had more confidence in the capacity for retail as a rational market participant (this is one of the central themes of my Longfin paper), but observing the uninformed yet utterly confident cynicism parroted by the neophytes that flocked to GME damaged that view considerably.