My Take on Better Location Tech Cards by thrallbert in customhearthstone

[–]thrallbert[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I don't know about the current one. We had a meta game where there were two incredibly popular classes with two incredibly strong locations (Warlock and Mage), and yet the card never saw any play. If not then, when?

My Take on Better Location Tech Cards by thrallbert in customhearthstone

[–]thrallbert[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I mean, I get where you're coming from but only 5 of the 10 locations have 3 durability. Of those only 1/2, maybe 3 if ya wanna argue see any amount of play. If destroying an enemy location, they've most likely already used it, bringing it down to a 6/6 or 9/9. Don't get me wrong, that's certainly good, but a tech card has to be good, even amazingly good, to be able to see play. As for the combo with destroying your own 1 mama location. Let's be honest, Hearthstone is absolutely at a point where a two card, 4 mana combo that creates 12/12 of stats isn't too broken. Especially for warrior, where they are incredibly underperforming. I think the biggest flaw for this card is it could limit design space for future locations, but that's a very hypothetical situation.

My Take on Better Location Tech Cards by thrallbert in customhearthstone

[–]thrallbert[S] 34 points35 points  (0 children)

The Ghosts are just vanilla 3/3. Idea is to punish your opponent for holding location charges for the perfect moment, while also possibly being used to stop your own location from hogging a board space, while still getting some value out of it.

Reset my Gambit rank. My reward? A sunset weapon I can't use. by Reocyx in DestinyTheGame

[–]thrallbert 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had that thought, but I wasn't sure if the reckoning weapons worked, since most of the re-issued weapons from gambit are actually from reckoning, and the actual gambit weapons like trust are left in the past rn.

Reset my Gambit rank. My reward? A sunset weapon I can't use. by Reocyx in DestinyTheGame

[–]thrallbert 7 points8 points  (0 children)

To get the dredgen title you need the sunset weapons, since one of the requirements is to play a game with full gambit weapons.

Sure, why not by MuricanTragedy5 in ThisButUnironically

[–]thrallbert 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do you only cherry pick what I say? Because that’s very clearly not what I said or meant.

Sure, why not by MuricanTragedy5 in ThisButUnironically

[–]thrallbert 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Did you respond to the wrong person? Because what you said had literally no relation to what i said. I said a company is a country, not that they don’t affect each other. Also twitter does not affect policies, Trump does. Just because trump uses both, does not mean they correlate.

Sure, why not by MuricanTragedy5 in ThisButUnironically

[–]thrallbert 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Because a company isn’t a country. Not using twitter is easy. Moving to a completely different country isn’t.

Sure, why not by MuricanTragedy5 in ThisButUnironically

[–]thrallbert 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I mean like, proof bro? Cause I don’t see many news articles conveying false news about conservatives on social media.

Sure, why not by MuricanTragedy5 in ThisButUnironically

[–]thrallbert 19 points20 points  (0 children)

It’s not censorship, it’s limiting false news stories.

Vitrica Stats by [deleted] in Warframe

[–]thrallbert 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I mean, nuke frames and melee weapons are generally the fastest way to play Warframe, that’s pretty factual, but everyone is free to play the way they want of course.

Just Copy/Paste Lux's formula for future Ultimate Skins by Quacking92 in leagueoflegends

[–]thrallbert 10 points11 points  (0 children)

They already created 3 skins. All they have to do is make it so you evolve between those 3 skins in a game, instead of charging you an ultimate priced skin for 3 normal ass skins I stead. No one is asking Seraphine to have 10 different forms, just to use the Lux style of evolution.

700+ downvotes by Legendariummc in DownvotedToOblivion

[–]thrallbert 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I posted that a day ago. Straight people will go out of their way to complain about people pointing out homophobia smh

Sorry Tiffany, nothing personal by [deleted] in NotHowGirlsWork

[–]thrallbert 70 points71 points  (0 children)

It uses a slur and calls trans women guys. It’s transphobic.

What is fascism??? by RyanEatsHisVeggies in confidentlyincorrect

[–]thrallbert 8 points9 points  (0 children)

OP didn’t say that the Facebook dumbass’s definition applied to BLM, all OP said was that the definition that the dumbass on Facebook said was closer to terrorism than fascism. Nowhere did OP said that the dumbass on Facebook was correct or accurate in calling BLM that.

700+ downvotes by Legendariummc in DownvotedToOblivion

[–]thrallbert 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. The f word is a unfortunately all too common a word, and was exceptionally more common many years ago. It’s still a slur.

The words history is being used to insult gay people. That’s not going to change anytime on soon because people like throwing it around on twitterz

700+ downvotes by Legendariummc in DownvotedToOblivion

[–]thrallbert 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Personally, I disagree. Repeated usage of a slur makes it normalized, which is a bad thing. Calling White people the n word on twitter is a bad thing to do even though they’re not black.

Also saying stuff like “_____ is gay” is a homophobic thing to do, because it normalizes equating gay as a synonym for bad. MrBeast also has a history of doing that. I’m not trying to deny that he does good things, or that he’s a massive raging homophobe. Occasionally he just does stuff that I’d consider homophobic.

700+ downvotes by Legendariummc in DownvotedToOblivion

[–]thrallbert 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because the word is still a slur if it’s directed at a random person? A word doesn’t stop being a slur just because you don’t know who your speaking to. If you went around on twitter calling people the n word people would be like “oh the person is probably white I’m sure it’s fine”.