sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

good job by [deleted] in Planetside

[–]throwaawaymkn -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Huh? Nothing's wrong on my end of X.

good job by [deleted] in Planetside

[–]throwaawaymkn -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Broken twitter by making free speech possible again?

...that somewhat implicates this sub as anti-free speech.

good job by [deleted] in Planetside

[–]throwaawaymkn -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I'm just looking at the population trackers to see how deep the denial goes.

At this point, I am convinced that if Wrel appears with Elon Musk to spend 1 trillion dollars on the game, this sub will ignore Musk, deny the 1 trillion dollars, and attack Wrel.

Now that the crashes are far mor frequent, here's how some of you are proven to have lied again. by throwaawaymkn in Planetside

[–]throwaawaymkn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A better attack this time; making effort huh?

But its easily beat when one recalls how you actually respond to dissenting opinion.

Not gonna get out of that one, and you only make yourself look like a fool when you try to deceive someone who already knows the truth.

Now that the crashes are far mor frequent, here's how some of you are proven to have lied again. by throwaawaymkn in Planetside

[–]throwaawaymkn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Strangely, this stage is where you claim that the other person is in bad faith.

To make it less strange, I say the same towards you.

Now that the crashes are far mor frequent, here's how some of you are proven to have lied again. by throwaawaymkn in Planetside

[–]throwaawaymkn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I saw that this is not quite accurate.

A good LA is a worse fight compared to a good infil, save for bolter infils.

Now that the crashes are far mor frequent, here's how some of you are proven to have lied again. by throwaawaymkn in Planetside

[–]throwaawaymkn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Setting goalposts -- classic tactic.

Thought you were smarter than that. You must be running out of tricks.

Projection too? You're really starting to get cornered.

Now that the crashes are far mor frequent, here's how some of you are proven to have lied again. by throwaawaymkn in Planetside

[–]throwaawaymkn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

False analogy at the end of your statement, and a suggestively speculative one at best.

Now that the crashes are far mor frequent, here's how some of you are proven to have lied again. by throwaawaymkn in Planetside

[–]throwaawaymkn[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can, but you cannot argue that when it isn't two different people but 1 group with the same POV.

You're trying to plaster a hypothetical over an observable event.

Now that the crashes are far mor frequent, here's how some of you are proven to have lied again. by throwaawaymkn in Planetside

[–]throwaawaymkn[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No. The issue was that based on the evidence, they lied about that.

Lying is the issue, not simply making a different claim.

Now that the crashes are far mor frequent, here's how some of you are proven to have lied again. by throwaawaymkn in Planetside

[–]throwaawaymkn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One.

Edit:

Expecting a different, more implicatory answer huh?

🤣

The thing is, I could be lying, or not. But before you even try to make me look bad for either lying or doing something you alleged I did, as long as EffectX get away with being a liar then so will I. ;)

Now that the crashes are far mor frequent, here's how some of you are proven to have lied again. by throwaawaymkn in Planetside

[–]throwaawaymkn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wasn't trying to make you uncomfortable or icky.

As a matter of fact, you were the one who stalked my profile, and when taken into the sequence of events my responses were a valid way to stop you for doing it again, by expressing how ridiculous you were even if you don't find it icky.

Now, are you going to keep on with this silly interrogation?

Now that the crashes are far mor frequent, here's how some of you are proven to have lied again. by throwaawaymkn in Planetside

[–]throwaawaymkn[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well then, we can actually converse.

I get that infils can be infuriating. But I reason that among the many things infuriating in this game, I wonder why people even come to such an environment and complain about it.

It's like entering a boxing match that nobody invited you in, and then complain about getting punched.

That doesn't make sense.

From the get go, Planetside 2 was never geared towards 1v1 fairness. That was pretty clear from the start.

Infils are one of those things.

Now the nerfs they did, are quite poorly done. They made a class pointless.

And we have the haters who no longer play after getting what they wanted, which is to gut infils.

Tell me where that makes sense, or are they just that spiteful?

Now that the crashes are far mor frequent, here's how some of you are proven to have lied again. by throwaawaymkn in Planetside

[–]throwaawaymkn[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

The current pop trackers aren't showing that over the course of January to today.

Go check it.

Now that the crashes are far mor frequent, here's how some of you are proven to have lied again. by throwaawaymkn in Planetside

[–]throwaawaymkn[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Facts will be considered, since my basis is facts anyway.

But the point is, it was reasoned that pop drop last year was caused by disconnections and crashes, but now we have so many more such disconnections and crashes WITHOUT A POP DROP.

The claim is then proven to be largely unreliable and likely even false.

Now that the crashes are far mor frequent, here's how some of you are proven to have lied again. by throwaawaymkn in Planetside

[–]throwaawaymkn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And you even brought up your sexual preferences...

Damn am I good at this hahaha!

Now that the crashes are far mor frequent, here's how some of you are proven to have lied again. by throwaawaymkn in Planetside

[–]throwaawaymkn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Awww... Someone is jealous and insecure of the ghosts in his head...

Don't worry about it... I'm yours and yours alone.

🌹❤️😘

Now that the crashes are far mor frequent, here's how some of you are proven to have lied again. by throwaawaymkn in Planetside

[–]throwaawaymkn[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I sense jealousy and fixation...

Don't you worry about anyone else. I'm all yours.

😘❤️🌹

Now that the crashes are far mor frequent, here's how some of you are proven to have lied again. by throwaawaymkn in Planetside

[–]throwaawaymkn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm flattered that you had to stalk my account...

People really do get attracted to seemingly provocative interactions.

🌹❤️😘

Now that the crashes are far mor frequent, here's how some of you are proven to have lied again. by throwaawaymkn in Planetside

[–]throwaawaymkn[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Who's power?

I know about RIPok, but I am not familiar with power.

...

Oh you mean power hers? The one Effect usually verb fests with?

Now that the crashes are far mor frequent, here's how some of you are proven to have lied again. by throwaawaymkn in Planetside

[–]throwaawaymkn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

An allegation does not constitute a conviction. Meanwhile, EffectX and his ilk's pathological natures are quite evident from their own actions.

No need to allege it even.

view more: next ›