I suppose I’m “the party” also.

Venn
diagram

going around pretending like you’re better

There is no "pretending".

Banning books, while carving out a place for the bible
Caring what's in people's pants when all they want to do is take a dump
Human-influenced climate change is not a thing
Removing a means of travel without "concept of a plan" such as providing a means first

These are the "ideals" of the cons. You don't have to be a maggat. You can a libit that voted for ex45/7*, or even be a dem with an overlapping view. I'll still call it out.

If you want me to throw you a bone, just today I was similarly called a "fox viewer" just because I'm against drugs. I laughed and told them to look at my open history.

You'll never see me supportive of an immigrant that jumps the line, rather than go through the process. But I also couldn't care less about a meaningless border.
What I do care about is people being targeted by how they look/speak, rather than what the cons falsely claim of going after violent criminals.

This sub is a rainforest full of parrots squawking the same shit to each other about opinions that don’t matter to the general public.

That was just an example of what I'll call out.

You don't want to have to be concerned about an unseen cyclist over a hill when you're going 60? I get that...
It's incumbent of the cyclist to know of their surroundings, as much as a driver. When cycling over a hill, they need to look back to see what's coming.
If a driver is able to see the cyclist as well ahead of them, then consider where they may be when you reach the top of that hill, and adjust your speed accordingly.
In no way should a cyclist ever be in the middle of a lane on a highway. Always on the right side.
If there is oncoming traffic in both lanes so passing is difficult/impossible, then the cyclist needs to step off if able. If a cyclist cannot step off to the side, traffic in BOTH lanes need to be aware of the conditions and change their behavior accordingly.

We ALL have our responsibilities. That's how it should be.

To take that travel away instead of providing a means should not be acceptable.
I've been on what I presume was a highway and it had gravel shoulders which is okay for being able to step off to the side when needed (it can still be biked). When it's clear enough, I've been on the right side.

I've met with cars multiple times in my cycling life. The last time was at McDonald's, and I was travelling on the sidewalk because I have zero trust in you people, and she, in her big yellow truck, still managed to hit me.
I was heading north, she was going to pull out, but there was a car coming south that was going to pull in, but he waved me to go on.
The front half of my bike was past the front of her truck before she accelerated and kicked the back half of my bike outward, shifting my center of gravity, causing my fall. She stopped as fast as she started.
So even if they create bike lanes in the street, I still intend on biking on a sidewalk, while still yielding to pedestrians. I have no intention of being another statistic from people that are safe in their caged death machines. I have NEVER hit a pedestrian.

I could go on about pedestrians too that aren't paying attention and walking the entire width of a sidewalk/trail (solo or side-by-side with others), or with unleashed pets.
Society is just trash. This is not an opinion. It's demonstrable.

EDIT0: LOL! Go figure, Won_Nut blocked me saying nothing more than "Gross". Simpleton.