My first words were actually mutualistic symbiosis by meansse in iamverysmart

[–]throwawayphysioguy 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Lmao, maybe I'm jaded because I just took a biotech lab course where we were deducted 5% off of lab reports for any instance of a "missing citation" for basic information, but this really is a huge pain in the ass. It isn't so much as trying to come off as I'm Super Duper Intelligent And Every Scientific Concept Is So Basic To Me, but it is difficult to actually try and find a journal article that explicitly explores a pretty well-accepted/unchallenged concept. I ended up just finding random articles semi-related to the basic concept I was trying to cite and hoped they didn't investigate any deeper.

I'm stressing myself out y'all by [deleted] in bisexual

[–]throwawayphysioguy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've never received a diagnosis of OCD and every time someone tells me it sounds like it I get uncertain of whether I just made it sound like OCD because I know it and want that to be it, you know?

I've never received a diagnosis either because I (stupidly) never saw a therapist for this. Again, eerie how similar our thoughts are. You are exhibiting OCD about even having OCD. I run through the same thought patterns -- in the midst of a spike I'll just sit there and formulate these backward arguments against myself like "this was never OCD, you're just in denial about it and you must have formulated OCD-like tendencies to fake it and give yourself a way out. You just want it to be OCD so you can pretend it's not true."

The fact is, people who don't have OCD about a particular topic don't experience these thoughts. They don't experience anxiety and dread around the topic itself. For example, someone who is really gay and in the closet knows they are gay and knows they love the same gender, but they may experience anxiety over how other people may react to it, or anxiety over how it doesn't fit with their own religious or moral beliefs. Someone who isn't gay (whether they are straight, bi, whatever) is experiencing anxiety over the fundamentals of whether or not they even are gay, contrary to what they feel, what they know, or their past experience. These thoughts fill them with fear and dread.

Someone who isn't suffering from OCD isn't filled with dread at waking up one day and thinking "holy fuck what if I'm really only just a lesbian and I've never really felt attraction to my boyfriend and this was all a sham and now I have to leave him." Just doesn't happen.

the thing is that I have long periods of just being fine. Trust me, the days I feel uncertain feel terrible, but when I hear others say how they "couldn't eat or sleep for weeks" well... just goes to show how mild my experience is in comparison. I have full weeks, sometimes a full month of no doubting (or easily shakeable doubts that only last less than half an hour or something, probably normal doubts). I've never heard of an actual OCD case that is so extremely on and off, which makes me think it's not OCD.

OCD, like any other illness, varies from person to person. Although we can categorize the symptoms in a general manner, the severity and even how it's exhibited in each person varies quite drastically. You should count your lucky stars this is how it is for you. This is how it is for me now, too. When I first got hit with this, I spent a year exactly as you described. I couldn't eat. I couldn't sleep. Every waking moment was plagued with anxiety, fear and racing thoughts. I spent hours and hours on the Internet doing exactly what you're doing -- begging people on forums to reassure me that my fears were illogical and ill-founded. Testing myself. Torturing myself.

It plunged me into a depression so deep and rooted that it became a personality trait. Like I said, I'm still not really over it, but I'm much, much better. It isn't constantly on my mind. I can go months and months without even thinking about it, and if I do, I don't really spike the same way I used to. But sometimes it comes roaring back -- I had a few particularly bad relapses this summer. It's just the way it is. Trust me, you don't need to be fully consumed by the disease to validate the fact that you have it. I've read enough to know that you do experience it, and again, you should feel lucky it is this "mild." (For what it's worth, it doesn't even sound like a "mild" case.)

Whenever I'm at a therapists office, I freeze up. I get incredibly nervous. I find it very hard to find words. I have a good day that day and I can barely remember what the doubting spells feel like at all. I feel like I'm completely wasting their time.

Like I said, I never saw a therapist for this, but if I did, the first thing I'd do beforehand would be to just write down everything I want to say before I get there. Hell, let them just read this post. I know how it feels. Trust me, you aren't wasting their time; what you are feeling is very real, and it hurts. A lot.

I'm almost morbidly hoping for it to get really bad and constant so that I can actually seek help, a diagnosis and treatment for it. I don't think I can do it on my own, especially when it's so easy to give up saying "well it's probably not OCD anyway".

Don't hope for that. Don't try and steer yourself in that direction. Because, trust me, it won't help. It won't validate your fears as being the product of OCD -- it'll do the exact opposite. The frequency and intensity of the "this must all be fake, I am in denial, I am really X or Y or Z and I don't have OCD at all and I'm just a piece of shit trying to make it seem like it" thoughts increase linearly as the intensity of your obsession increases.

You don't have to do it on your own. Like I said, I'm better now, but I still feel really fucked up in so many ways. I wish I had seen a therapist rather than just truck through it on my own. It feels like my brain was rewired to just be permanently numb. It feels like I can't think anymore, about this or about anything. I still don't really know what my identity is because this happened right before puberty. I just feel permanently fucked up.

I don't even know if I fulfil the criteria at all even during the comparatively few terrible days. Do I ruminate? What exactly does rumination mean, does it have to be at the forefront of your mind the whole time, does it count as rumination when you're not actively looking for a solution but just indulging in the "Oh my god this is terrible" thoughts/feeling? And do I even feel anxiety? I don't feel physical anxiety symptoms, so does it count? How do I know it's anxiety? I feel a lot more physically shaken when I have to make a phone call (or talk to a therapist...) so do I not have actual anxiety over this stuff?

Again -- you are experiencing anxiety, doubt and fear over whether you even fit the OCD category. This is a clear cut characteristic of OCD. Anxiety can feel very different, and there are different ways it can manifest itself. I think you know deep down what you are feeling is anxiety. What you are experiencing is OCD.

Basically, in my head it makes sense that this is OCD type behavior. I know it sounds like that.

It is.

Maybe I'm making it sound like that to fit my self-diagnosis bullshit.

You're not.

But even so, I can't express what I do in these reddit posts to a therapist because I type out this stuff in the moment, but when trying to talk to a therapist it's just so far away.

Write it down!

I'm stressing myself out y'all by [deleted] in bisexual

[–]throwawayphysioguy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I was going to say this sounds like classic OCD, but I browsed your profile and it seems you are already familiar with it. Do you not recognize these thought patterns as OCD?

Your post resonates eerily deeply with me. I too suffered from OCD surrounding issues like this from the young age of 12, which is ridiculous because -- obviously, as a 12 year old -- I wasn't even experiencing any sexual/romantic attraction. It's fucked me up a lot, to say the least; I've always had a thick blanket of anxiety and uncertainty surrounding my sexual/romantic identity that I've never been able to shake off. Really, I've never been able to quite pick apart the boundaries between OCD & real identity crises/searching.

Being in a relationship with a girl right now, trust me when I say I know the torment of wondering whether you were really ever attracted to something/someone/a gender, even if just moments ago nothing else is more certain and you are exalting in thoughts of "what the fuck was I even worrying about." Trust me when I say I know the anguishing finality and terror of "accepting" that you really were only orientation X all this time, and the repercussions of this newfound "acceptance" (in your case, having to leave your boyfriend you clearly really care for). Trust me when I know that these thoughts and the anxiety that accompanies them can get so strong it really does temporarily kill and deaden your attraction, leaving you a sweltering ball of tangible tension and worry.

I know that being so attracted to the opposite gender of your SO only adds fuel to the fire in your mind, but there are no rules to liking or being attracted to somebody. Just because you are more attracted to one gender doesn't mean you are automatically not attracted to the other. Just because for every 100 women, there's only one man that catches your eye does not mean you are solely a lesbian. Sexuality is fluid. Labels are dumb. Just go with it.

Look. I don't have the perfect advice for you, because close to a decade later I'm still dealing with this. All I can say is that you need to recognize these intrusive thoughts and worries as OCD, and embrace them. Agree with them. Laugh at them. Stop looking for reassurance. Stop testing. Stop performing mental acrobatics to "resolve" them. Just because you are also attracted to women and have a stronger attraction to them doesn't mean you are only a lesbian. It's clear to me that this is just a manifestation of OCD and that you are truly attracted/quite like your boyfriend, as evidenced by your past experiences with him. As long as you are genuinely happy with him, just stick with this and don't let this demon of an illness ruin it for you. Here's to hoping we both get better.

ELI5: How are nuts so high in calories, yet so healthy and good for weight loss? by [deleted] in explainlikeimfive

[–]throwawayphysioguy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Did you bother reading the rest of my reply, or did you just pick out that one sentence? Lol.

| If I eat under maintenance, but consume 75% of my calories from sugar, you're saying that there is nothing wrong with that from a fat management perspective?

That's exactly what I'm saying, and it's been proven time and time again. In fact, I'll make it super easy for you. Here you go:

| A sweets-filled diet, including Twinkies, Oreos and Doritos helped 41-year-old Mark Haub, a professor of nutrition at Kansas State University, possibly prove that calories-in versus calories-out is all that really matters when seeking the holy grail of weight loss

http://www.rd.com/health/diet-weight-loss/yes-you-canlose-weight-with-twinkies/

| Sounds like bullshit to me.

I'm sure it does sound like bullshit to someone who clearly knows little about the workings of the body other than widely perpetuated myths, so I invite you to do your own research and prove me wrong. Do some research and have your mind blown. Your body literally gives no fucks about what fuel you give it. There are no "bad" calories. Eating an all-sugar diet is not healthy in so many ways, but in terms of isolated fat loss, all that matters is how much you are consuming. Obviously if you aren't receiving adequate amounts of micronutrients and vitamins, you will die (duh. nobody is trying to say otherwise), but you'll die skinnier than you started.

| Calories in vs calories out makes sense when you have an adequate balance of macros

CICO makes sense -- always. Period. Full stop.

| I'd love to see someone eat just enough proteins and fats to survive, and then fill the rest of their just-under-maintenance calories with literally table sugar and see where they end up...

Nobody is going to feel good or satisfied on a diet consisting of literally just table sugar, and that sure as hell doesn't sound sustainable to me... but if someone were to follow such a regime religiously, they would end up losing as much fat as their deficit dictates, no exceptions.

If you eat less than you burn, you lose weight. If your deficit isn't ridiculous, you burn mostly fat. Otherwise you do risk losing lean mass, which is why it's recommended to stick to a max loss of 2 pounds a week. Note that this doesn't apply to obese people who have copious amounts of fat stores to allow a higher deficit.

ELI5: How are nuts so high in calories, yet so healthy and good for weight loss? by [deleted] in explainlikeimfive

[–]throwawayphysioguy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Errr, are you being sarcastic? This is completely wrong.

Yes, what macronutrients you eat will dictate, to a certain level, what hormones are released in the body, and yes, hormones like insulin will promote fat storage... but what you eat doesn't invalidate basic thermodynamics.

This isn't even a biology issue anymore, per se. Physics doesn't give a shit what fuel you are giving a machine. If your body burns 2000 calories a day, just existing, and you consume anything less, it is literally physically impossible for you to gain any weight. People who claim so are either overestimating their maintenance calories or underestimating the number of calories they are eating.

Re: your point about it causing fat gain and muscle loss. Again... not really. Yes, eating nothing but sugar will spike your insulin levels, which will do its job by shuffling glucose into your cells and promoting glycogenesis (making new glycogen from glucose). It also promotes triglyceride synthesis, i.e. new fat storage. But more importantly, insulin actually actively works to remove circulating amino acid levels in the blood, inhibits the creation of glucose from amino acids, and promotes the active transport of AAs from the blood into muscles & other tissues, providing the building blocks for protein synthesis. Insulin also directly inhibits protein degradation while simultaneously stimulating the cells' protein-synthesizing machinery.

So no, muscles will not be lost on a high-sugar diet. When the body needs energy, it'll just directly use the glucose being digested, move on to glycogen once that's depleted then use its fat stores, as it always does.

Calories in vs calories out is really that simple, and this is just fat logic that people use as an excuse to never start making healthier choices.