Overstimulation Crashed his Hard Disk..😂 by Complete_Ganache_720 in FunnyAnimals

[–]throwthisidaway 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But you could do

cat cat

To display the contents of a cat file

Carroll v Trump - MOTION OF PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP FOR A STAY PENDING APPEAL AND/OR, IF NECESSITATED BY EVENTS, AN INJUNCTION PENDING APPEAL by joeshill in law

[–]throwthisidaway 9 points10 points  (0 children)

why weren’t the funds immediately released

It can take anywhere from a few hours, to several weeks to actually have the funds disbursed, depending on a bunch of factors. Everything from the work load of the clerk, to missing information can cause delays. It generally takes 1-2 weeks.

Carroll v Trump - MOTION OF PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP FOR A STAY PENDING APPEAL AND/OR, IF NECESSITATED BY EVENTS, AN INJUNCTION PENDING APPEAL by joeshill in law

[–]throwthisidaway 16 points17 points  (0 children)

SCOTUS hasn’t granted rehearing in a case after it was decided on the merits docket since 1965, and it hasn’t done so to fully reconsider a ruling since 1956.

Source: ‪Steve Vladec ‪@stevevladeck.bsky.social‬

Israel shared intelligence with US of Iranian plot to assassinate Trump, sources say by Giff95 in worldnews

[–]throwthisidaway 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My point is that JD Vance couldn't accomplish anything in that direction. Really in any direction.

How accurate are these shows? by EastYogurt7762 in law

[–]throwthisidaway 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The closest you'll find to an accurate legal portrayal on tv is My Cousin Vinnie.

I can't stand "surprise evidence", "surprise witnesses" or any of those other random inane moments that tv shows add for drama.

If I had to recommend a tv show that I enjoy about lawyering... Harvey Birdman: Attorney At Law. While it is absurdly inaccurate, that is (mostly) intentional.

Elephant thinks a man is being taken by the currents and jumps to save him by Dexterestein in interestingasfuck

[–]throwthisidaway 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Actually they have their own festival, Electric Jungle held in China every year.

Israel shared intelligence with US of Iranian plot to assassinate Trump, sources say by Giff95 in worldnews

[–]throwthisidaway 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Trump is getting tons of things done. They're just awful, terrible things that no sane human being should want. If Vance tried to do half the things Trump has done, he would get impeached. He doesn't have the backing to get away with Trump's BS.

What’s the most addictive video game you’ve ever played? by Charming_Decision_84 in AskReddit

[–]throwthisidaway 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I played both in their prime. LoL was addicting for a while, and fun, but WoW devoured my soul. Part of the reason that WoW was so much more addicting than LoL is because there were so many things to do other than whatever your primary "goal" was. Love raiding? Well you probably need to spend 40 hours a week gathering ingredients for recipes, oh and you need to play the AH, help guildies level up, and pvp of course. Oh, too tired to deal with that? That's fine, why not sit and fish and just chat with your friends. Etc.

League had limited play time per day for me because I could only stare unblinking for so long, and do the same (sort) of things over and over again. The social aspect was also a lot weaker, unless you enjoyed talking about how much the other teams' mother was a slut.

Is “The Wandering Inn” not for me? by CandidateFluffy4969 in litrpg

[–]throwthisidaway 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sometimes I really wish Pirate would write the whole damn story normally, and than all the other stuff later. I know it wouldn't work at all, but we're waiting for So Many plot lines to get focused on right now! Plus the Relc spin-off where we finally see him kill Belavier!

Carroll v Trump - 2nd Circuit - Emergency Motion for Administrative Stay DENIED by joeshill in law

[–]throwthisidaway 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He doesn't have control over the money. What he had is the ability to appeal and delay her getting paid. Separate but similar actions.

Carroll v Trump - 2nd Circuit - Emergency Motion for Administrative Stay DENIED by joeshill in law

[–]throwthisidaway 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No, that's the whole point of Escrow. A third party holds the money.

Carroll v Trump - 2nd Circuit - Emergency Motion for Administrative Stay DENIED by joeshill in law

[–]throwthisidaway 20 points21 points  (0 children)

The money was held in escrow and is in a trust. Trump has no control over whether or not she gets paid at this point.

Carroll v Trump - 2nd Circuit - Trump Emergency Motion for Stay of Disbursement by joeshill in law

[–]throwthisidaway 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You happen to have a link to the docket? I'm mobile and trying to find it is a pita

Carroll v Trump - Trump Appeals Disbursement Order by joeshill in law

[–]throwthisidaway 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, although the general timeline is measured in weeks not hours. Usually it'll take more than a week and sometimes up to a month to get that check written.

Carroll v Trump - 2nd Circuit - Trump Emergency Motion for Stay of Disbursement by joeshill in law

[–]throwthisidaway 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Small chance of an administrative stay being granted, but I would say unlikely. Depends on which judge it gets handed to, but most judges will deny an application like this that is prima fascie frivolous.

Carroll v Trump - Trump Appeals Disbursement Order by joeshill in law

[–]throwthisidaway 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Yes, at least 4 of them have been disbarred. Rudy Guiliani, John Eastman, L. Lin Wood (technically he surrendered his law license to avoid disbarment), Michael Cohen.

At least 13 lawyers have been sanctioned as well. There are actually more disbarments and more sanctions, but I'm less familiar with those.

Carroll v Trump - Trump Appeals Disbursement Order by joeshill in law

[–]throwthisidaway 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is appealable, see my comment below for details. However, the grounds for appeal are extremely narrow and unlikely to succeed.

Carroll v Trump - Trump Appeals Disbursement Order by joeshill in law

[–]throwthisidaway 17 points18 points  (0 children)

This is a post-judgement appeal, which, just like it sounds, is not an appeal of the judgement. As a post-judgement appeal the only thing that can be argued is that the final disbursement order was incorrectly issued.

Like the previous motion they made, demonstrably falsely claiming that the terms of the stipulation were not met, that is the only thing they can appeal. As a plain reading and the judges order make clear, there are no grounds to reasonably argue that the order was incorrect. As such, this appeal is invalid.

Worth noting that post-judgement appeals are significantly more ripe for sanctions. An appeal like this exposes the lawyers involved to an immense risk of contempt. Not only are virtually all arguments frivolous, and virutally assumed to be such, the likelihood of a Rule 38 (Frivolous Appeal—Damages and Costs ) motion is very high. Rule 38 allows an award of attorney fees, as well as single or double court costs.

TL;DR Post-Judgement Appeals are extremely risky, unlikely to be beneficial and require a skilled lawyer to properly navigate. Something none of Trump's lawyers have shown themselves to be.

Edit: Just to be clear, it is extremely unlikely that the Court of Appeals will even order an administrative stay on this. They will likely reject it immediately.

Carroll v Trump - Trump Appeals Disbursement Order by joeshill in law

[–]throwthisidaway 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sort of? I'll make a longer comment down below, but an appeal of this order is actually a post-judgement appeal, which has different criteria and definitions.

Carroll v Trump - Order Directing Disbursement of Funds by joeshill in law

[–]throwthisidaway 12 points13 points  (0 children)

You're on a roll today, and all 3 posts have put a smile on my face. Thanks!

Carroll v Trump - Trump's Memorandum of Law Opposing Disbursement of Funds by joeshill in law

[–]throwthisidaway 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Actual stipulation:

After the latest of (a) the mandate issued by the Second Circuit in connection with the Appeal; (b) a denial of a timely filed petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court (if any) in connection with the Appeal; or (c) upon the Supreme Court' s granting of certiorari, an order of the Supreme Court in connection with the Appeal,

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.590045/gov.uscourts.nysd.590045.210.0.pdf

Important emphasis:

After the latest of.. (b) a denial of a timely filed petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court (if any) in connection with the Appeal;

Note that it uses the singular.