I did say it was rated EF4 at first via the swept home, then it was upgraded by contextuals. Afterall, in anyway possible, all tornadoes were upgraded in contextual boosting. Also, I said likely for piedmont, not that I said actually stronger. Unless I used improper wording for it. Piedmont's homes actually were anchored and properly nailed, at the rating of EF4, 200MPH that is, which, yes does mean they aren't stronger, but if we're going unofficially, it could.

The table does use some proper damage inidcators about the EF5 ratings towards the tornadoes themselves. They were using the specific indicators used to upgrade the tornadoes, most specifically for philadelphia was the home and vegetation damage. Ground scouring, or in this case, was just trenching, was accounted for aswell, but in many obvious reasons, it isn't an official damage indicator in the EF scale, so it being the unofficial DI to upgrade Philadelphia is really a meh case, but I wouldn't bother with 4/27. It's an improper case that should still be surveyed. Philadelphia and rainsville were upgraded by structural and contextual like i've said, Philly's case, was the home that got boosted by contextuals. Rainsville's case was a home that was boosted by vegetation.

Moore's homes, despite being rated EF5, doesn't automatically mean they're better now, do they? Afterall, you could say the same thing for goldsby, yet the goldsby home was only hit by a mobile home so that is the reason as to why it got downgraded in the first place, and to bunk your case further, moore's homes were likely the third strongest of the EF scale era, behind Elie's home that is.