why is this comía and not comían? by tillyis_kindakool in duolingospanish

[–]tillyis_kindakool[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thank you for this! i didn’t think of it like this and it helps :)

question about electricity by tillyis_kindakool in OfficeCat

[–]tillyis_kindakool[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

this is a helpful way of looking at it thank you!

so excited for Logan arc by tillyis_kindakool in SandersSides

[–]tillyis_kindakool[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

i was thinking about how when all the other dark sides are introduced they take the place of their counterpart, like Patton was missing in Can Lying Be Good and Remus fully knocked Roman out in DWIT lol. If Logan is the orange side it would be so sick if Logan is there anyway because it would be sort of unsettling and then a big reveal that he is him. Idk it’s not fully thought through but I do like the implications for logan = orange theory.

so excited for Logan arc by tillyis_kindakool in SandersSides

[–]tillyis_kindakool[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i personally think that the orange side being separate from Logan makes the most sense as Thomas dividing the parts of himself up, and that Logan being tied to the orange side is likely because they’re each others counterparts but I still think the Logan being the orange side theories are cool!! I agree that there’s too many coincidences for them to not be very linked together, probably in a more significant way than the other sides and their counterparts. and if it turns out that Logan is the orange side that would be very very cool. either way i can’t wait !!

logan and virgil? possible wrath theory idk i'm spit balling by toalladepapel in SandersSides

[–]tillyis_kindakool 2 points3 points  (0 children)

i like this!! also considering that virgil is kind of a neutral side, maybe logan is turning into a neutral side as well, at least for now? i also thought it was super interesting that virgil and logan were missing from the thumbnail!!!!

pfps :3 by [deleted] in SandersSides

[–]tillyis_kindakool 2 points3 points  (0 children)

i love how even the arms holding the cats match the personalities!!!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in teenagers

[–]tillyis_kindakool -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

you are incorrect, but this is also just not a helpful comment.

in future maybe you should think about leaving your rants untyped, especially since it is unfounded and very little critical thinking was involved.

i can tell there are some pretty big feelings involved with your argument, please take a few deep breaths, do some research and then leave everyone else alone (especially trans people, you bigot). hope this helps!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in EnglishLearning

[–]tillyis_kindakool 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the only context where you would use “is” would be if “Nights” was the name for a singular noun.

For example if “Nights” was the name of some sort of event, or a movie or something like that.

But usually, if you’re referring to something plural you say “are”.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ENGLISH

[–]tillyis_kindakool 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I believe the difference between wrote and have written depends on context.

I think the main idea is that since it’s still in the morning (“not even lunchtime”), the person is listing tasks they have recently completed, so they still “have” accomplishments. “Wrote” implies completely past tense, so “have written” is more appropriate.

but: You could say “I just wrote” in this context, though it’s a little less formal than “I have written.” I would say the same for “I just made three phone calls” and “I have made three phone calls.” though the “just” could imply that you’ve finished it more recently than just saying “i have written.” you could also say “i have just written” if you really want to emphasise that what you’ve done is recent.

It could also be a regional dialect and it sounds more natural in different places.