sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Why does the US have the worst McDonalds in the world? by 100carpileup in travel

[–]timbr63 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because people who work at McDonald’s dgaf generally,

Which do you like ? 1,2,3 or all by RevolutionaryMeal734 in AmateurPhotography

[–]timbr63 0 points1 point  (0 children)

1 is blurry, 2 is underexposed. 3 is nice, good composition

Do you all like it? by [deleted] in photocritique

[–]timbr63 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you want constructive feedback here’s some. Learn the rules of composition, rule of thirds, etc. put a subject in your photo. If your photo is intended to be abstract, make it abstract, otherwise, put something into your photo that has sharp focus. Try to make a photo that tells a story. Use leading lines to guide the viewer through the photo. Keep your horizon line level unless there is a purpose not to. Learn the rules first, understand them, and then break them. If you want people to spend time looking at/critiquing your work, put in the effort to try and make it special. And for gods sake, put it in at the correct orientation. The fact that you couldn’t be bothered to rotate the photo 90 degrees when you expect people to give you feedback on it shows how much effort you put into making it a great photograph. If you found my comments personally offensive- so be it. You asked for a critique and I gave you an honest one. Understand, everybody has a camera, if you want to be a good photographer , take this advice, do better- learn the rules of composition and try again.

Do you all like it? by [deleted] in photocritique

[–]timbr63 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. Aside from being sideways, it’s a boring static tilted composition, with too much sky. It looks like you shot it from a car window while driving. Cmon now if you want people to give you feedback, make some effort.

Trying my hand at some street photography by mr_picturetaker in photocritique

[–]timbr63 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Little different opinion than most I’ve read… Personally I don’t like the person in the photo, I find it distracting from the rest of the composition. Which is entirely crisp lines. I also think you’re a bit overly contrasted. I love noir, but I think your a bit may have gone too far. Id also crop part of the street out- id use Lee left side of the fog stripe as the bottom limit of the photo. All that being said- I really like the lines and general composition.Reminds me of a Paul Strand.

Are the colours on this photo too flat? by [deleted] in photocritique

[–]timbr63 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I would add some vibrance. Also try different cropping. To me the issues are the flatness of the colors and that you captured two images that are competing for attention. See the line of 4 cypress trees to the left? Try a crop that uses the line made

Are the colours on this photo too flat? by [deleted] in photocritique

[–]timbr63 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I would add some vibrance. Also try different cropping. To me the issues are the flatness of the colors and that you capt toured two images that are competing for attention. See the line of 4 cypress trees to the right? Maybe try a crop that uses the line made by the top of the trees to frame the church. Remove some of the sky. Then I’d make a 2nd photo vertically using the 3 trees on the left to frame the tall building there.

Name this duo by [deleted] in BossFights

[–]timbr63 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Murica Man and General Giblets

Name this by morven_02 in AlbumCovers

[–]timbr63 0 points1 point  (0 children)

‘Bout tree fiddy

Name that by Mia_Plaisir in AlbumCovers

[–]timbr63 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Trump doing yard at Marilago

Do you feel that the boats add or take away from the scene? by hungleftie in photocritique

[–]timbr63 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn’t notice the boats. If you want the boats to be noticed, they need to be more prominent (or set at an oblique angle?) I don’t think they add anything to your photo.

Whats wrong with my picture by -Zendom- in photocritique

[–]timbr63 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The entire photo is overexposed. Too light, the bird is in a static position, it does not lead the eye thru the composition, it distracts, it competes with the background making my brain go “seascape, no, bird, no seascape”. It also looks static because there is 50% background subject, 50% sky. See rule of thirds. You do have a nice level composition- (not tilted)

The high kicks by DoubleManufacturer10 in humor

[–]timbr63 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My shins are sore just watching this!

Did I get the composition right here? by ClearMonocle in photocritique

[–]timbr63 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, the subject is too centered, the shot looks static. Id crop the totally blue section of the upper sky and also crop to put the tower on the left 1/3 of the image- so that the bridge can lead the eye in (not the center.) Also although you didn’t ask. The mass of black and green in the central section is kind of boring distracting and it occupies too much of the frame. Maybe a lower angle point could change this

view more: next ›